[sage-combinat-devel] Re: Combinatorica-like commands in Sage

2012-01-14 Thread Raymond N. Greenwell
I should add that one of my motivations for running Sage notebook is that, on my home computer, HasseDiagram doesn't work in terminal mode. The command from sage.combinat.posets.hasse_diagram import HasseDiagram produces the following error: type 'exceptions.ImportError' Traceback (most

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 14/01/2012 00:48, Jason Grout a écrit : I'd love to, if we have enough disk space for another sage install on that disk. Right now, we have around 4.4G free, so it would take up about a quarter to half of the space left for all of the sagenb.org servers. That seems a little tight to me. A

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Dima Pasechnik
looks good (chrome on MacOSX). What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page reloading? Is it a bug or a feature? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I am not sure if this is Sage's bug. Similar things happen on mathoverflow.net... On the other hand it might just mean that the mathjax settings need to adjusted. Or could it be tinymce? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: looks good (chrome on MacOSX). What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page reloading? Is it a bug or a feature? Are you talking about Chrome asking for permission to run a java applet? I think that's a Chrome thing, and not

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 1:17 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: On Saturday, January 14, 2012 2:11:55 PM UTC+8, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/13/12 5:04 PM, William Stein wrote: Are you planning to install mathjax on any *.sagenb.org http://sagenb.org http://sagenb.org? I cleared off some space and

Re: [sage-devel] New termcap spkg (#12282) needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
*bump* On 2012-01-11 22:35, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: This is now the very last ticket needing review for sage-4.8 (at least, as far as we know): On 2012-01-09 14:21, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: Please review *blocker* ticket #12282. It fixes a segmentation fault in the termcap library, triggered

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 2:51 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: Le 14/01/2012 00:48, Jason Grout a écrit : I'd love to, if we have enough disk space for another sage install on that disk. Right now, we have around 4.4G free, so it would take up about a quarter to half of the space left for all of the sagenb.org

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: looks good (chrome on MacOSX). What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page reloading? Is it a bug or a feature? Are you talking about Chrome asking for

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 8:51 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: looks good (chrome on MacOSX). What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page reloading? Is it

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 8:59 AM, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/14/12 8:51 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: looks good (chrome on MacOSX). What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page

[sage-devel] Re: Indemnification against intellectual property infringement claims

2012-01-14 Thread Dr David Kirkby
On Jan 13, 6:05 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote: I think this is a substantial mis-reading of the document. No, it's a mi-sunderstanding by you - possibly due to less than ideal wording by me. The indemnification has to do only with covered programs furnished by Oracle. Yes So if

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

2012-01-14 Thread Dr David Kirkby
On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sage-Devel, PROPOSAL:  I propose that we remove python_gnutls, gnutls, opencdk, libgcrypt, and libgpg_error from Sage-5.0.   See below for details. VOTE: [ ] Yes, remove them! [ ] No, we need them. [ ] Woops -- you are

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

2012-01-14 Thread William Stein
On Jan 14, 2012 9:00 AM, Dr David Kirkby drkir...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sage-Devel, PROPOSAL: I propose that we remove python_gnutls, gnutls, opencdk, libgcrypt, and libgpg_error from Sage-5.0. See below for details. VOTE:

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

2012-01-14 Thread Dr David Kirkby
On Jan 14, 5:07 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 14, 2012 9:00 AM, Dr David Kirkby drkir...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sage-Devel, PROPOSAL:  I propose that we remove python_gnutls, gnutls, opencdk,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

2012-01-14 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, January 14, 2012 9:07:08 AM UTC-8, William wrote: On Jan 14, 2012 9:00 AM, Dr David Kirkby drki...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Very few people actually use the notebook in secure=True mode. For those that do, I think

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 1:17 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: On Saturday, January 14, 2012 2:11:55 PM UTC+8, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/13/12 5:04 PM, William Stein wrote: Are you planning to install mathjax on any *.sagenb.org http://sagenb.org http://sagenb.org? I cleared off some space and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

2012-01-14 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-01-14 18:22, Dr David Kirkby wrote: Yes, and are you sure port fowarding is permitted by the more entreprise level operating systems. I am not on a Unix box just now, but I suspect that might fall into the same category as X forwarding. It probably depends on how sshd_config is set up,

Re: [sage-devel] Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

2012-01-14 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I have made an unofficial sage-5.0.prealpha1 release. It's an updated version of the previous prealpha0. The only main change is the inclusion of the new matplotlib spkg (#11915). Source archive:

[sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I have made an unofficial sage-5.0.prealpha1 release. It's an updated version of the previous prealpha0. The only main change is the inclusion of the new matplotlib spkg (#11915). Source archive:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

2012-01-14 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Dr David Kirkby drkir...@gmail.com wrote: What part of the GPL? Can you be more specific.  I know there is this clause However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not include anything that is normally distributed (in either source or

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

2012-01-14 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:26 AM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, January 14, 2012 9:07:08 AM UTC-8, William wrote: On Jan 14, 2012 9:00 AM, Dr David Kirkby drki...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: Very few people

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

2012-01-14 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I have made an unofficial sage-5.0.prealpha1 release.  It's an updated version of the previous prealpha0.  The only

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: Thanks for the feedback; please test the fixes. I really hate to write this, but it's important.Evidently, I have never seriously looked at MathJax before just now, I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

2012-01-14 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:18 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I have made an unofficial

[sage-devel] Re: Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Nathan Dunfield
The very first thing I tried was show(2/3* x^(3/2 + pi)).  On sagenb.org with jsmath it looks amazing -- just like pdflatex output.  On test.sagenb.org it looks horrible to my eye -- definitely nowhere close to tex or even jsmath. I don't know if this helps, but the visual horribleness is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com  wrote: Thanks for the feedback; please test the fixes. I really hate to write this, but it's

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 2:37 PM, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.comwrote: Thanks for the feedback; please test the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

2012-01-14 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:27 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:18 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: On Jan 9, 2012, at

[sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

2012-01-14 Thread Simon King
On 14 Jan., 20:18, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout I have exactly the same issue on my OSX 10.6.8. Just to raise awareness, I want to remind people that OS X 10.7.x support is a total blocker for Sage-5.0. Can someone provide me with

[sage-devel] Removing spkg/base repo (#11073) needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
At #11073, Volker Braun and I have a patch which removes the spkg/base repository by absorbing it into the root repository. It also moves important scripts like sage-spkg, sage-env, sage-sage (renamed to sage) to a new directory spkg/bin. The main advantage is that it simplifies the build

[sage-devel] Re: Removing spkg/base repo (#11073) needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 3:58 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: It allows running ./sage -ipackage.spkg and ./sage -sh right after downloading a source tarball, making for easier debugging of the Sage build process. I'm curious: what does this mean? For example, we needed to test the new sagenb spkg in a clean

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Removing spkg/base repo (#11073) needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-01-14 23:03, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/14/12 3:58 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: It allows running ./sage -ipackage.spkg and ./sage -sh right after downloading a source tarball, making for easier debugging of the Sage build process. I'm curious: what does this mean? It means the following

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: Do I have to install special fonts? What am I doing wrong? If this is really what MathJax looks like, I definitely don't want to switch to MathJax. Over on sage-notebook, I forwarded a message from Davide which tells us what is happening. I quote

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: Do I have to install special fonts? What am I doing wrong? If this is really what MathJax looks like, I definitely don't want to switch to MathJax. I pushed a fix to test.sagenb.org. The default now should be to use TeX local fonts, then TeX web

[sage-devel] Re: Sage pay electric for build slaves

2012-01-14 Thread Dr David Kirkby
On Jan 10, 4:04 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: I'm not sure if this idea will go down well, but I'll mute it anyway. I know William has switched off machines (t2.math for example), as he does not

[sage-devel] Re: Sage pay electric for build slaves

2012-01-14 Thread Dr David Kirkby
On Jan 11, 10:36 am, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote: Just wondering: is bandwidth a problem for you, or would that potentially become a problem if there were more buildbots at your place, possibly also building and uploading binaries? I don't have a cap on bandwidth, but upload

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

2012-01-14 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote: On 14 Jan., 20:18, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout I have exactly the same issue on my OSX 10.6.8. Just to raise awareness, I want to remind people that OS X 10.7.x

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

2012-01-14 Thread MartinX
Successful build with the sage atlas.spkg using 'fast' default arch, but if I build with environment set to use my own atlas ( also 3.8.4) matplotlib won't build; it thinks numpy is not installed. Not sure if this is specific to 4.8 as I have only just got my atlas up and running. All but, three

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/14/12 5:24 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: Thanks a lot for the fix. This works here now on firefox. It also works on opera as long as I am using the worksheet. The _published_ worksheet on the other hand only half-works in opera. See the attached screenshot for the glitch. Can anyone else confirm

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage pay electric for build slaves

2012-01-14 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Dr David Kirkby drkir...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 10, 4:04 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: I'm not sure if this idea will go down well, but I'll mute it anyway. I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: It's a little sad to me that the only way to get the menu is right click.  This is somewhat non-mac friendly (and downright hostile to tablets and phones), as we saw often with jmol at the JMM booth where we were

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-14 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Saturday, 14 January 2012 23:29:55 UTC+8, jason wrote: On 1/14/12 8:59 AM, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/14/12 8:51 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: looks good (chrome on MacOSX). What