[sage-combinat-devel] min-part, max-part

2012-01-19 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Dear compositions lover, I found a weird bug which perhpas needs a ticket : it is not possible to send a composition for argument inner/outer of Compositions as in : {{{ sage: c = Composition([2,2,1]) sage: C1 = Compositions(5,outer=c); C1 Compositions of the integer 5 satisfying constraints

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: dot2tex, combinat

2012-01-19 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi Travis! On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:16:34PM -0800, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: Here's the new patch: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12314 Note: this patch breaks later patches in the queue (tested on Sage 4.7.2): - displayhook-fh.patch -

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] min-part, max-part

2012-01-19 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Hello, I think we should record such things for the week at Cernay during which we intend to speak about basic object in combinatorics. Feel free to create a wiki page about weirdness in basics objects of combinatorics. I will also try to add some comments about integer vectors. I think you

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] min-part, max-part

2012-01-19 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi, I think we should record such things for the week at Cernay during which we intend to speak about basic object in combinatorics. +1 to start to make plan for Cernay. Feel free to create a wiki page about weirdness in basics objects of combinatorics. I will also try to add some

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, 16 January 2012 22:42:20 UTC+8, Burcin Erocal wrote: On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:37 -0800 (PST) Dima Pasechnik dim...@gmail.com wrote: Once again, let me bring up the numerical noise issue on ARM. The problem is that while we pretty much narrowed it down to a particular

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-19 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 19/01/2012 09:15, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : Installing cephes means building static libs and putting appropriate headers somewhere in $SAGE_ROOT/local (cephes is currently only installed on Cygwin, where it provides some missing functionality for complex number support), using parts of its

[sage-devel] Macupdate site is for Sage is ... interesting

2012-01-19 Thread kcrisman
http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/27562/sage Apparently some people actually download Sage from Macupdate.com. Unfortunately, the information is not very accurate. (Some of the reviews are negative, too, but that's a different matter, as people will have preferences.) For instance, the download

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-marketing] Macupdate site is for Sage is ... interesting

2012-01-19 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:57 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/27562/sage Apparently some people actually download Sage from Macupdate.com. Unfortunately, the information is not very accurate. (Some of the reviews are negative, too, but that's a different

Re: [sage-devel] Two articles of interest to Sage in latest Notices

2012-01-19 Thread daly
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 23:45 +0100, Burcin Erocal wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:26:33 -0800 (PST) kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: Publishing Computational Mathematics, by Tim Daly (of Axiom, a frequent contributor on sage-devel) http://www.ams.org/notices/201202/rtx120200320p.pdf

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-19 Thread William Stein
Hi, Regarding jsmath and mathjax... It seems like we have the issues worked out for the Sage notebook. Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, etc., for their persistence. I was just browsing mathoverflow, e.g., [1], and noticed that suddenly their math typesetting is very, very painful to look at.

[sage-devel] Re: Macupdate site is for Sage is ... interesting

2012-01-19 Thread kcrisman
On Jan 19, 12:12 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:57 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote: Here's a confused customer: Please use a reasonable name for the app, just Sage.app. Version and platform information does not belong in the app's name. This

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-19 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:37:00 AM UTC-8, William wrote: Hi, Regarding jsmath and mathjax... It seems like we have the issues worked out for the Sage notebook. Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, etc., for their persistence. I was just browsing mathoverflow, e.g., [1], and noticed

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-19 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/19/12 11:37 AM, William Stein wrote: Hi, Regarding jsmath and mathjax... It seems like we have the issues worked out for the Sage notebook. Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, etc., for their persistence. At what point should we merge it? I hesitate to merge it into #11080, since we've

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-19 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: On 1/19/12 11:37 AM, William Stein wrote: Hi, Regarding jsmath and mathjax...   It seems like we have the issues worked out for the Sage notebook.  Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, etc., for their persistence.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-19 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:09 AM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:37:00 AM UTC-8, William wrote: Hi, Regarding jsmath and mathjax...   It seems like we have the issues worked out for the Sage notebook.  Yeah, and thanks to Jason, David, etc.,

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-19 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/19/12 12:34 PM, William Stein wrote: (which exposes that font bug in mathjax). Just to be clear, since your comment could be read two ways, my understanding is the bug is in Lion, not in mathjax. Thanks, Jason -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

2012-01-19 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote: On 1/19/12 12:34 PM, William Stein wrote: (which exposes that font bug in mathjax). Just to be clear, since your comment could be read two ways, my understanding is the bug is in Lion, not in mathjax. Thanks.

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-19 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, 16 January 2012 22:48:01 UTC+8, Snark wrote: Le 16/01/2012 15:42, Burcin Erocal a �crit : On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 04:21:37 -0800 (PST) Dima Pasechnikdim...@gmail.com  wrote: Once again, let me bring up

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-19 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-01-19 14:46, Julien Puydt wrote: Does there exist a mechanism which allows an spkg to leave some file, where some variables are defined, which will get used for the compilation of packages afterwards? What do you have in mind? -- To post to this group, send an email to

Re: [sage-devel] the ARM port - numerical noise

2012-01-19 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 19/01/2012 20:11, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2012-01-19 14:46, Julien Puydt wrote: Does there exist a mechanism which allows an spkg to leave some file, where some variables are defined, which will get used for the compilation of packages afterwards? What do you have in mind? We need

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

2012-01-19 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 01/17/12 04:50 AM, Volker Braun wrote: On Monday, January 16, 2012 8:35:56 PM UTC-5, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Personally I don't see how OpenSSL can be considered a major part of the operating system. You misread the license. For GPL purposes, a system library can be totally insignificant

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

2012-01-19 Thread Volker Braun
On Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:07:21 PM UTC-8, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I don't see any reference to system library Fine, replace it with library of the operating system on which the executable runs. and I certainly would have thought totally insignificant and major to have different