On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:34:49AM -0500, msh...@math.vt.edu wrote:
P.S. I want to make a bunch of changes to the coxeter group
and root system stuff but feel that it is premature to do so until
the code stabilizes somewhat. Any advice?
As soon as http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6588
*bump*
Please review, this is needed for gcc.
On 2012-02-09 17:29, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
The old (pre-flask-sagenb) Twisted spkg has some .c files with invalid C
code generated by an old version of Pyrex. This are files which are
only compiled on OS X Darwin and gcc-4.6.2 fails to compile
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Keshav (et al.),
I think the reason I implemented the kludgy sage -clone Sage branch
thing (way back in maybe March 2006) was because we had no dependency
checking for Pyrex files. Now that we have dependency checking,
lightweight branching should
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Hope that helps. Evidently other people in this thread do not know that
I have been maintaining a git version of the Sage library, so hopefully
it will help them too, if they're
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
Cool -- that's actually exactly what I had done before sending the
email, thinking it was the natural thing to do.
https://github.com/williamstein/sagelib
In general, what version of the Sage library is at sagemath/sagelib on github?
I am making sure
Can we get Lion on bsd.math.washington.edu ?
sqrt5 is down again...
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
On 2/19/12 11:46 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
Or use hg-git -http://bitbucket.com/durin42/hg-git/ - to pull your
patch into the hg Sage library. hg-git is much less experimental than
git-hg, I believe.
That's what I've done. I develop in git, then when I want to make a
patch in mercurial, I use
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
In the category of glue code I meant to include everything in
$SAGE_LOCAL/bin/sage-*. I see much of that stuff as
On Sunday, February 19, 2012 11:49:23 PM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-02-19 06:53, John H Palmieri wrote:
On the plus side, on the laptop where I had problems before, Sage built
and passed all doctests using the default compiler:
You mean 5.0.beta4 worked or do you mean my
Hi Keshav,
thanks for pointing out this thread. log messages is an interesting
title to discuss the future directions for Sage. :) I added
gentoo-science to the CC list, since that is the most likely location
for sage-on-gentoo discussion and the gentoo-developers might be
interested in the
Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com writes:
Keshav: is there an easy way to make a new git command which generates
a mercurial patch by adding those lines to the top of a generated
patch?
Sure, just drop a script called `git-sage-patch` somewhere in your $PATH.
Here's such a script::
Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org writes:
Hi Keshav,
thanks for pointing out this thread. log messages is an interesting
title to discuss the future directions for Sage. :) I added
gentoo-science to the CC list, since that is the most likely location
for sage-on-gentoo discussion and the
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi Keshav,
thanks for pointing out this thread. log messages is an interesting
title to discuss the future directions for Sage. :) I added
gentoo-science to the CC list, since that is the most likely location
for
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Keshav (et al.),
I think the reason I implemented the kludgy sage -clone Sage branch
thing (way back in maybe March 2006) was because we had no dependency
checking for Pyrex
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
I think the reason I implemented the kludgy sage -clone Sage branch
thing (way back in maybe March 2006) was because we had no
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
I think the reason I implemented the kludgy sage
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we get Lion on bsd.math.washington.edu ?
I could, but then we will no longer have a 10.6 build/test machine, I
think, and that would be bad.
Also, I can't do this until next week, since I'm in San Diego right now.
I'm not sure, whether this is a different problem or not (but I
decided to post an answer here instead of a new posting).
I do not receive trac e-mail notifications since 10-02-2012. The last
mail I got was on 09-02-2012. It was from #8718. There should be a
couple of other notifications on this
On Monday, February 20, 2012 7:53:05 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Sunday, February 19, 2012 11:49:23 PM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-02-19 06:53, John H Palmieri wrote:
On the plus side, on the laptop where I had problems before, Sage built
and passed all doctests using
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:33:27 Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi Keshav,
thanks for pointing out this thread. log messages is an interesting
title to discuss the future directions for Sage. :) I added
gentoo-science to the
On 2012-02-20 20:47, John H Palmieri wrote:
With plain 5.0.beta4, I have the same problems as with earlier versions
of Sage: pari fails self-tests, symmetrica gives a doctest failure in
the Sage library, etc.
That's not unexpected, thanks for testing!
--
To post to this group, send an email
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:11 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
William Stein
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:39 PM, François Bissey
francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:33:27 Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi Keshav,
thanks for pointing out this thread. log messages is an
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey
francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
snip
There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would say that
if it gets merged we may very well put the doc back into sage and just build
it. We could keep fetching pre-built doc for
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:43:29 Benjamin Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey
francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
snip
There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would say
that if it gets merged we may very well put the doc back into sage and
Hi,
I think Sage documentation is quite good, but with a big flaw: it is
widely missing for cross links. Many classes and methods could greatly
benefit from a SEE ALSO section. I would like to advertise for this... If
patch writer and reviewer tries to more or less systematically
On Monday, February 20, 2012 2:43:29 PM UTC-8, Benjamin Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey wrote:
snip
There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would say
that
if it gets merged we may very well put the doc back into sage and just
build
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:13:33 John H Palmieri wrote:
On Monday, February 20, 2012 2:43:29 PM UTC-8, Benjamin Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey wrote:
snip
There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would
say
that
if it gets
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
In the category of glue code I meant to
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, February 20, 2012 2:43:29 PM UTC-8, Benjamin Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:39 PM, François Bissey wrote:
snip
There are efforts to parallelize the building of the doc and I would say
that
I used Mercurial, which is why I am confused. I would like to figure
out why this happened to avoid the problem in the future.
Jonathan
On Feb 19, 11:41 pm, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Jonathan gu...@uwosh.edu writes:
For example I'm trying to patch base.pyx inside
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:27, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
But yes, this sounds like a great idea! So the
collection of .ebuild files (and
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
Cython is just a py(x) to C compiler. The problem is not Cython per
se, but re-building when changing branches. Each clone
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
Cython is just a py(x) to C compiler. The problem is
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:27, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu writes:
But yes,
35 matches
Mail list logo
