Hi,
This makes the behavior a bit harder to decide if it is consistent:
sage: Partition([4,3]) in Cores(12,length=7)
True
sage: Core([4,3], 12) in Partitions(7)
False
I think that Cores behaves properly in this case, but Partitions does
not.
Should we be modifying partition.py so that
class
Hi,
In principle this sounds ok (and we could put this in the k_tableau patch).
My only concern is whether if c = Core([4,3],12) is considered an element
of Partitions, then all methods of partitions should/would apply. They
currently do not.
Best,
Anne
On 2/29/12 5:29 PM, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
I don't think that the methods of Partition class should be in the
methods of Cores, but I do think that if isinstance(x, Core), then x
in Partitions().
Some of the methods for partitions (e.g. k_skew ) should not behave
the same on Cores as Partitions. All I am suggesting is that we
change the
On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 15:45:41 UTC+13, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 02/27/2012 07:20 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
While working on #10682, with Maxima 5.26 I get
sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/calculus/desolvers.py
On 2012-02-29 01:31, Maarten Derickx wrote:
Dear All,
I just got my very first own server up and running, I installed debian
stable (squeeze 6.0.4) on it. And I saw that sage doesn't have a
buildslave for debian yet. I might want to make it available as a
buildslave depending on the answers
On 2012-02-29 02:37, deSitter wrote:
Simply including complex.h in base.c would probably work
No.
My guess is a problem with gcc.
Are you absolutely certain that you are using gcc-4.6.2? I have seen
this problem with older versions of gcc but never with gcc-4.6.2.
--
To post to this group,
At #12599, I have patched the setuptools spkg to make spkg-install
executable. Apart from this, every spkg-install and spkg-check file in
the standard packages is executable.
Please review, it should be a trivial review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12599
Thanks,
Jeroen.
--
To
On 2012-02-29 01:31, Maarten Derickx wrote:
Dear All,
I just got my very first own server up and running, I installed debian
stable (squeeze 6.0.4) on it. And I saw that sage doesn't have a
buildslave for debian yet. I might want to make it available as a
buildslave depending on the answers
I'm doing it right now.
On 29 fév, 11:24, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
At #12599, I have patched the setuptools spkg to make spkg-install
executable. Apart from this, every spkg-install and spkg-check file in
the standard packages is executable.
Please review, it should be a
On 29 February 2012 09:18, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-02-29 02:37, deSitter wrote:
Simply including complex.h in base.c would probably work
No.
My guess is a problem with gcc.
Are you absolutely certain that you are using gcc-4.6.2? I have seen
this problem
This is all fixed by update of maxima to 5.26, and the corresponding patch.
The ticket is ready for review!
On Monday, 27 February 2012 08:56:06 UTC+13, William wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
I wanted to raise the profile of #10682, since it's a bug in which
Sage's sum command (which calls maxima)
Take a look at this:
http://www.molto-project.eu/node/1412
It is a library that can translate natural language sentences to sage
commands. I haven't tested it, but the examples they show sound
impressive:
sage compute the product of the octal number 12 and the binary number
100.
(3) 40
answer:
Does this library also include speech recognition? :)
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 11:55:47 AM UTC, mmarco wrote:
Take a look at this:
http://www.molto-project.eu/node/1412
It is a library that can translate natural language sentences to sage
commands. I haven't tested it, but the
Also, I think that what William is proposing is something a lot better
suited to the owner field which we are currently wasting. Isn't that
exactly what it's for?
Another argument for using the owner field: the Author and Reviewer
fields use real names, whereas the owner field uses trac
On Feb 29, 6:55 am, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
Take a look at this:http://www.molto-project.eu/node/1412
It is a library that can translate natural language sentences to sage
commands. I haven't tested it, but the examples they show sound
impressive:
sage compute the product of the
On 2/28/12 10:01 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Feb 27, 2:19 pm, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:42 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:31 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Why is the default color for an ellipse (and
On 2/29/12 5:55 AM, mmarco wrote:
Has somebody tested it?
Do you think it would be worth the effort of including this in sage? I
think that, for example, having an option in the notebook to enter
commands in natural language would be a killer feature (assuming it
works fine).
Never heard of
On 2/28/12 11:19 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Needs reviewer, or
something - that's probably not the right wording, but you get the
point.
Exactly what I was going to suggest, if we are indeed going to go in the
direction of yet another layer and step before a patch gets reviewed.
There is a
Let's see, gcc --version shows a 4 thing, a 6 thing, and a 2 thing.
That's probably because I downloaded and installed gcc 4.6.2. (!!)
-drl
On Feb 29, 4:18 am, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
On 2012-02-29 02:37, deSitter wrote: Simply including complex.h in base.c
would probably
Well there's no doubt that it's happening. The compiler had no problem
at all building and installing mpc, mpfr, gmp, ppl, and cloog, so it's
not a problem with how it handles complex numbers as such. It's
something in the interaction of Sage, gcc, and Sun Studio.
-drl
On Feb 29, 6:00 am, David
Hello everybody !!!
There has been a bug report [1, 2] on ask Sage about a memory leak with
CPLEX. I checked, and it is True. But I do not think I know how to patch
that.
Here is the thing : the dominating_set function (among many others) uses
Linear Programming, and so creates a LP object when
On Feb 29, 2012 5:30 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/28/12 10:01 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Feb 27, 2:19 pm, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:42 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:31 AM, William
This has been in since Sage 4.7.2, though. There is no longer a
default FIGSIZE - it is None, and Jason pretty clearly intended to
make that go away if you read the patch at #2100, which I'm sure made
sense to all of us at the time, not that I can figure out why now.
I'm not really
Dear Prof. Saludes,
This email is cc:ed to the official Sage developer list, which we
welcome you to join at sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Appended see some
of the very positive reaction to your MOLTO project to give Sage
natural language interface.
I have at least one question, though.
On 29 February 2012 13:58, deSitter antimatter3...@gmail.com wrote:
Well there's no doubt that it's happening. The compiler had no problem
at all building and installing mpc, mpfr, gmp, ppl, and cloog, so it's
not a problem with how it handles complex numbers as such. It's
something in the
I have always used the cc field as a way of saying: Here's a ticket
you might be interested in and could possibly review. And I have
never been bothered if that did not result in a review from that
person.
And when I am cc'ed on a ticket I always welcome it as an *invitation*
to review, without
Python uses a garbage collector to reclaim memory. Objects don't die just
because they fall out of scope, they will be around until the next GC cycle.
You can force the garbage collector with
import gc
gc.collect()
but that is a rather expensive operation so you don't want to do call it
all
What is the issue with haskell? Its license?
On Feb 29, 6:33 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:55 AM, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
Take a look at this:
http://www.molto-project.eu/node/1412
It is a library that can translate natural language sentences to
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Python uses a garbage collector to reclaim memory. Objects don't die just
because they fall out of scope, they will be around until the next GC cycle.
Minor note: At least when using Cython, sometimes objects will be
On Feb 29, 12:52 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
IIRC, the idea was to rely more on matplotlib, and the default ways to
configure matplotlib (which includes setting the default figure size). IIRC,
On 2/29/12 12:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:58 AM, mmarcomma...@unizar.es wrote:
What is the issue with haskell? Its license?
Licenses aren't the issue. We can't include a Haskell program in Sage
without including the Haskell compiler (buildable from source) in
Sage.
Le mercredi 29 février, William Stein a écrit:
Licenses aren't the issue. We can't include a Haskell program in Sage
without including the Haskell compiler (buildable from source) in
Sage. And there's no way we're doing that. We already have to deal
with too many different programming
On 2/29/12 9:30 AM, William Stein wrote:
Do you know how to change the default figure size?
This is one way:
import matplotlib as mpl
mpl.rcParams['figure.figsize'] = [20,1]
I agree that we should wrap this so people don't have to import matplotlib.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Le mercredi 29 février, William Stein a écrit:
Licenses aren't the issue. We can't include a Haskell program in Sage
without including the Haskell compiler (buildable from source) in
Sage. And there's no way we're
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:12 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
It's difficult for me because they are patch in hg format, but I can't
export a patch out of git in hg format. It's possible to import the
code in from the trac ticket, but then if I make changes I have to
export them
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
--=_Part_115_6111097.1330538107790
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Python uses a garbage collector to reclaim memory. Objects don't die just
because they fall out of scope, they will be around until the next GC cycle.
You
Can someone familiar with the above please take a look at the (3 line)
patch at,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9826
The crash no longer happens in the 5.0 betas, however it's not clear to
me what was fixed and whether or not the original fix should still be
applied.
See also:
I agree with Rob. I think it is completely unacceptable to list a
person as a reviewer unless they have previously volunteered, or
responded to an explicit request (which they might decline). The
analogy with refereeing papers for publication is apt.
John
On 29 February 2012 17:16, Rob Beezer
I think the problem William is trying to resolve is that there are lots of
tickets marked as need review on trac, where nobody besides the author
feels any responsibility for getting them reviewed. Perhaps the idea of
using the CC field for this purpose is a good one: whenever you mark a
ticket
Le mercredi 29 février, William Stein a écrit:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Julien Puydt
julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Le mercredi 29 février, William Stein a écrit:
Licenses aren't the issue. We can't include a Haskell program in
Sage without including the Haskell compiler
On Feb 29, 4:06 pm, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
I think the problem William is trying to resolve is that there are lots of
tickets marked as need review on trac, where nobody besides the author
feels any responsibility for getting them reviewed. Perhaps the idea of
using the CC
Hi
On 29 February 2012 22:21, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
If it only built what it *needs to build*, not what it *needs*, then
there would be a gain too. Let me stress again : I have some of the
things it needs already, so it could just use it.
I was under the impression...
ticket but don't want to review it, or remove yourself from the CC list.
By the way, I don't think this removes one from Trac notification
emails for that ticket, correct?
I don't know. I think it should if you've never commented on the ticket.
David
--
To post to this group, send an
OK, I am happy with using the CC field in this way, though I would
still want to be able to CC someone without the implication that I was
suggesting them as a reviewer. If I really want to ask someone to
review my work, though, I would prefer to ask them directly (say by
email) as has happened to
You can use the custom query:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/query?status=needs_reviewauthor=~cremonaorder=prioritycol=idcol=summarycol=statuscol=typecol=prioritycol=milestonecol=component
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 14:10, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I am happy with using
Le mercredi 29 février, Jan Groenewald a écrit:
Hi
On 29 February 2012 22:21, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
wrote:
If it only built what it *needs to build*, not what it *needs*, then
there would be a gain too. Let me stress again : I have some of the
things it needs already,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Le mercredi 29 février, William Stein a écrit:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Julien Puydt
julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Le mercredi 29 février, William Stein a écrit:
Licenses aren't the issue. We can't
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
Hi
On 29 February 2012 22:21, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
If it only built what it *needs to build*, not what it *needs*, then
there would be a gain too. Let me stress again : I have some of the
things
Hi
On 29 February 2012 23:35, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
Hi
On 29 February 2012 22:21, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
wrote:
If it only built what it *needs to build*, not what it *needs*, then
Le mercredi 29 février, William Stein a écrit:
Even if Sage didn't include Python (say), we would still have to worry
about it as a dependency, and big would be replaced by sage has too
many dependencies.
I tought I had insisted enough : the spkg would still be there,
ready to be used. It
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:01:46 PM UTC-8, Snark wrote:
Le mercredi 29 février, William Stein a écrit:
(1) when you want to apply a theorem, do you just check for the
hypotheses then go on, or do you re-do the proof down from the
axioms?
Neither. This is a false analogy.
So, returning to the original subject. Would it be ok to have this
natural language interface, say, as an optional package? Or as someone
suggested, to have it in some experimental server?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Em 29 de fevereiro de 2012 19:24, Julien Puydt
julien.pu...@laposte.net escreveu:
Le mercredi 29 février, Jan Groenewald a écrit:
Hi
On 29 February 2012 22:21, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
wrote:
If it only built what it *needs to build*, not what it *needs*, then
there would be
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
Amazingly, after all we went through, I still have a messed up repo
(no master branch). Sigh.
deep:d wstein$ git branch
12594
github-master
lfun
* trac_8393
I guess I should just start over.
You almost never need to start over with git. Just
On 2/29/12 5:31 PM, mmarco wrote:
So, returning to the original subject. Would it be ok to have this
natural language interface, say, as an optional package? Or as someone
suggested, to have it in some experimental server?
Yes! And Yes! Please, go for it!
Jason
--
To post to this group,
On Feb 29, 5:23 pm, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
You can use the custom
query:http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/query?status=needs_reviewauthor=~...
Which reminds me that it is totally insane that
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/search
doesn't have a link to the custom query
OK, I went back and checked the path in the .patch file. The
pertinent lines in the path file are
--- sage/plot/plot3d/base.pyx@16321
+++ sage/plot/plot3d/base.pyx
I ran into the problem with 5.0.beta2...
Since the paths above look correct, could something be messed up in
that version of sage?
On Thursday, March 1, 2012 10:52:52 AM UTC+8, Jonathan wrote:
OK, I went back and checked the path in the .patch file. The
pertinent lines in the path file are
--- sage/plot/plot3d/base.pyx@16321
+++ sage/plot/plot3d/base.pyx
I ran into the problem with 5.0.beta2...
Since the paths
58 matches
Mail list logo
