Dear Vincent, dear Nathann,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:33:48AM -0300, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
There was in sage-combinat queue a patch of Mike that add to
Permutation a decorator @combinatorial_class_from_iterator for
burhat_succ and bruhat_pred in order to return a CombinatorialClass
Hi All!
Is this a bug or a feature?
sage: [mu for mu in Partitions(6, min_slope=-2)]
[[6], [4, 2], [3, 3], [3, 2, 1], [3, 1, 1, 1], [2, 2, 2], [2, 2, 1,
1], [2, 1, 1, 1, 1], [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]]
given that
sage: Partition([6,0])
[6]
That is, since sage follows the usual convention in ignoring
Hi Mark,
...
I also want to fix the following element methods for weight/root
lattice/space
to_positive_chamber (should probably be called to_dominant_chamber)
reduced_word (it should be called weyl_direction or somesuch)
They should really be computed by the same
method.
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 02:04:44PM +0100, Christian Stump wrote:
Christian: I had to slightly rebase
trac_11187-finite_reflection_groups-cs.patch for the doctests I just
added to apply_simple_reflection and friends.
This time I rebased nonnesting_partitions-cs.patch which was touching
For the record: the Sage-Combinat queue applies smoothly on Sage 5.0.beta7.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry Isil nthi...@users.sf.net
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Le dimanche 11 mars, William Stein a écrit:
+1. (and I *hate* adding packages)
As it's optional, it's not really added: +1 too.
And I hate packages...
Snark on #sagemath
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On 2012-03-11 23:34, Florent Hivert wrote:
Isn't it used for compiling Cython code ?
Of course it is indeed. But compiling Cython code is not the main use
I had in mind for this package.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
On 3/11/12 10:32 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
Hi,
I just sent a student an email with some links to computations on the
single cell server on aleph.sagemath.org. I used the shortened
temporary links to get something shorter. But how long will those links
work?
Those are just IDs in the database, so
Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net writes:
As it's optional, it's not really added: +1 too.
But it is not optional - Jeroen is proposing to make this a standard
package. Or did I misunderstand you?
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an
Le lundi 12 mars, Keshav Kini a écrit:
Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net writes:
As it's optional, it's not really added: +1 too.
But it is not optional - Jeroen is proposing to make this a standard
package. Or did I misunderstand you?
Poor choice of words on my part : it is not
I should amend my comment, since I was sloppy. Neither `x+1` nor `-x
-1` is inherently positive or negative. `|x+1|` is the only thing
that is, so that output would be the most correct result of your real
expression. If Maxima doesn't actually return that, as the doc you
quote says it does, or
On 03/12/12 11:00, Peter H. wrote:
I should amend my comment, since I was sloppy. Neither `x+1` nor `-x
-1` is inherently positive or negative. `|x+1|` is the only thing
that is, so that output would be the most correct result of your real
expression. If Maxima doesn't actually return that,
It looks like the order of the elements was being determined by their
id which would be system dependent. I've updated the patch and all
should be well now. Thanx for the help.
-Jim
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Mar 11, 8:46 pm, Starx jst...@gmail.com
I'm all in favor of adding the gcc spkg.
One thing that I'm not entirely happy with is that we bulid gcc without
graphite/ppl/cloog, so I suspect that the code speed isn't as good as it
could be. But since we only use the self-compiled gcc if the os-supplied
one is crap I think its fine.
--
On Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:15:35 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
What are your +1/-1 to making GCC and MPC standard packages?
+1 (especially since it allows us to build Sage on Lion without making
other compromises)
--
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to
Ah cool, didn't know!
I forgot to add thatmathjaxis supported in the newest version of the
sage notebook, eg,http://test.sagenb.org
And the precursor tomathjax(jsmath) is what we support in the current
notebook.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On 2012-03-12 19:48, Volker Braun wrote:
I'm all in favor of adding the gcc spkg.
One thing that I'm not entirely happy with is that we bulid gcc without
graphite/ppl/cloog, so I suspect that the code speed isn't as good as it
could be. But since we only use the self-compiled gcc if the
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:44:21 Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-03-12 19:48, Volker Braun wrote:
I'm all in favor of adding the gcc spkg.
One thing that I'm not entirely happy with is that we bulid gcc without
graphite/ppl/cloog, so I suspect that the code speed isn't as good as it
could
On Friday, 17 February 2012 19:38:10 UTC+8, jason wrote:
The current plan is that twisted will be bundled in with the sagenb
spkg, and will not have a separate spkg.
let me put here the fact that I mentioned on the relevant trac ticket, that
Python 2.7.2 spkg will by default pull Twisted
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:59 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to make this change sometime in the next few months. If
anybody has any thoughts, feel free to share.
There's a patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12659.
It should allow you have to both old
20 matches
Mail list logo
