Hi Mike,
On 5/13/12 7:14 PM, Mike Zabrocki wrote:
I have been digging into Macdonald polynomials all this last week and every
time I think I have a way of cleaning up the problem, I scratch the surface
and another problem arises.
I'd like some advice about what should be going on behind
On 5/13/12 10:32 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Following advice of Volker, I installed 5.0rc1. This install went
fine. However, the combinat queue does not apply:
patching file sage/combinat/partition.py
Hunk #1 FAILED at 428
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
Dear Martin, Hugh, Florent,
partition_k_boundary_speedup-fh.patch
since this happens frequently: is there a way for me to fix it and help?
In fact, I also get this reject in sage-5.0.beta14:
There was a conflict with the newly introduced patch
Sorry! I should have been aware that I should check for conflicts. I will
be more careful in the future!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hey Nicolas,
First off, when I try to apply the queue, I get the following conflict:
patching file doc/en/reference/combinat/index.rst
Hunk #1 FAILED at 3
1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
doc/en/reference/combinat/index.rst.rej
patch failed, unable to continue (try -v)
patch
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:45:43AM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
Again the queue does not apply fully:
applying concrete_combinatorial_statistics_and_maps-cs.patch
errors during apply, please fix and refresh
concrete_combinatorial_statistics_and_maps-cs.patch
Is it possible that this is due
On May 14, 2012, at 7:47 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Le lundi 14 mai, Keshav Kini a écrit:
A better solution, IMO, is to make scripts check the actual contents
of the SPKG for extraneous directories and files. There should be no
directories other than src/ and patches/ ; the line src/ should be
On 2012-05-14 07:49, Julien Puydt wrote:
I thought doing make dist gave clean sources, meaning it wouldn't
contain everything in the repository
(neither .hg, .git, .svn, .whatever, nor generated content, nor...).
Indeed, this should be the case.
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 03:59:55PM +0200, Florent Hivert wrote:
Cool ! At the Sage Days 38 we have been doing a lot of tutorial using notebook
with a lot of text at this is extremely annoying. Too bad we learn of it right
after the Days. By the way, half a dozen of those tutorials should be
On Sun, 13 May 2012 14:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
My problem was that i needed to do implicit derivation. Something
like:
sage: f=3*x^2*y^3-5*x*y+x^2-3*y^2+4*x-3*y+1
sage: f.diff(x)
9*x^2*y(x)^2*D[0](y)(x) + 6*x*y(x)^3 - 5*x*D[0](y)(x) - 6*y(x)*D[0](y)
(x) + 2*x -
I don't think the problem here is coercion, but conversion (and,
mostly, the ability of the symbolic framework to handle these
numbers).
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On Mon, 14 May 2012 04:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote:
I don't think the problem here is coercion, but conversion (and,
mostly, the ability of the symbolic framework to handle these
numbers).
The symbolics framework can handle these numbers. You can use
arbitrary python
On Monday, May 14, 2012 6:14:39 PM UTC+8, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 03:59:55PM +0200, Florent Hivert wrote:
Cool ! At the Sage Days 38 we have been doing a lot of tutorial using
notebook
with a lot of text at this is extremely annoying. Too bad we learn of it
On May 14, 3:14 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
- Contributing to Sage;
I noticed some minor typos, but in
http://combinat.sagemath.org/doc/thematic_tutorials/tutorial-editing-sage-sources.html#a-real-modification
there's a serious one (Section 4): It still has the
14 matches
Mail list logo
