Terribly sorry for all the spamming but I'm truly perplexed by the
following error. I tried a similar toy example to test the **keywords
syntax and it worked.
I thought I had changed the sage.categories.modules_with_basis.ModulesWithBasis
tensor ParentMethod to accept keyword arguments.
Well,
I tried doing
make start
After that, the code worked! Somehow
sage -b
was not properly remaking sage. I have no idea why not.
--Mark
Terribly sorry for all the spamming but I'm truly perplexed by the
following error. I tried a similar toy example to test the **keywords
syntax
On 2014-02-23 18:28, Volker Braun wrote:
OpenGL states
that the result is undefined (i.e. may lead to graphics glitches)
If the result is undefined, that's a good reason to avoid NaNs.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To
What is the license of the Sage library (not Sage-the-distribution)
supposed to be? I know it used to be GPL v2+, but Volker has changed
this in the documentation to GPL v3+ (see 67a76032) while COPYING.txt
states GPL v2+. Was this intentional or a mistake in the documentation?
Jeroen.
--
Thanks -- missed that somehow when searching trac.
Robert
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
AFAIK it is GPL v3+, there should be some old discussion on sage-devel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
On 2/24/14 8:26 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
AFAIK it is GPL v3+, there should be some old discussion on sage-devel
IIRC, it is GPL v2+. I'd be interested in seeing the discussion you
reference.
Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel
Uh oh. Splendid. License discussion (again).
Since GPL v3+ is not compatible with GPL v2 (without +), a change
from GPL v2+ to GPL v3+ would mean a change to a more restrictive license.
IIRC, Sage-the-library always was intended to be GPL v2+, while
Sage-the-distribution might have
On 2014-02-24 15:57, Georg S. Weber wrote:
IIRC, Sage-the-library always was intended to be GPL v2+, while
Sage-the-distribution might have incorporated GPL v3+ parts by now,
but note that IIRC Singular has a license either GPL v2 or GPL v3
which would rule out something as a (not existing at
On Monday, 24 February 2014 15:57:23 UTC+1, Georg S. Weber wrote:
Uh oh. Splendid. License discussion (again).
Since GPL v3+ is not compatible with GPL v2 (without +), a change
from GPL v2+ to GPL v3+ would mean a change to a more restrictive license.
IIRC, Sage-the-library always was
On 2/24/14 9:01 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Sage-the-distribution is GPL v3 only. This is the only license which is
compatible with all components of Sage.
IIRC, that is because some components are licensed as GPL 2 or 3, while
others are GPLv3+, right?
Thanks,
Jason
--
You received this
Hi
Perhaps someone on sage devel can help. Specifically this is called:
0 jan@snapperkob:~/src/sagemath-optional/sagemath-optional-6.1/debian$grep
-A1 SPKG postinst
for SPKG in /usr/lib/sagemath/upstream/*; do
HOME=/root/ DOT_SAGE=/root/.sage /usr/bin/sage -i
Hi
Where are these directories in / really supposed to be installed?
$SAGEROOT/local/share?
Things like conway and cremona are there:
0 root@muizenberg:/usr/lib/sagemath/local/share#ls
aclocal conway_polynomials docgap git-core graphs info
locale maxima perl
Sage has been accepted for the Google Summer of Code 2014 programme.
Harald
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Good to hear. Do we already know how many students will be assigned?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
No. First we need the proposals and we evaluate and rank them. This
means, everyone discusses them, gives them a number from 0 to 10, and
we set their state to ok (or however it is called) or invalid.
Then I am, in my role as administrator, tell google melange two
numbers: minimum number of how
Without any spelunking on sage-devel, as GPLv3+ is a subset of GPLv2+ all
you need is find a source file that claims specifically GPLv3+. I'm at a
conference right now and haven't done the grep exercise, but I'm pretty
sure that will be easy to find.
On Monday, February 24, 2014 3:39:15 PM
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Without any spelunking on sage-devel, as GPLv3+ is a subset of GPLv2+ all
you need is find a source file that claims specifically GPLv3+. I'm at a
conference right now and haven't done the grep exercise, but I'm pretty
* William Stein wst...@gmail.com [2014-02-24 11:34:25 -0800]:
Thus I find no code in the core Sage library that is GPLv3(+).
I found these three matches:
$ grep -r version 3 .
./schemes/toric/points.py:# as published by the Free Software Foundation;
either version 3 of
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Julian Rüth julian.ru...@fsfe.org wrote:
* William Stein wst...@gmail.com [2014-02-24 11:34:25 -0800]:
Thus I find no code in the core Sage library that is GPLv3(+).
I found these three matches:
$ grep -r version 3 .
./schemes/toric/points.py:# as published
On 2014-02-24 20:42, Julian Rüth wrote:
./rings/number_field/splitting_field.py
This code is mine can be released under the GPL v2 also. I simply copied
the copyright statement from the new developer's manual (the one which
was changed from version 2 or later to version 3 or later).
Jeroen.
IMHO GPLv3+ is the recommended license by the FSF. What exactly is there to
fix?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
* Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com [2014-02-24 12:20:43 -0800]:
IMHO GPLv3+ is the recommended license by the FSF. What exactly is there to
fix?
In many places we have GPLv2 (without the +). GPLv3+ is incompatible
with GPLv2 (http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses).
julian
On 2014-02-24 21:32, Julian Rüth wrote:
In many places we have GPLv2 (without the +)
I hope not, that would be a big problem.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
* Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be [2014-02-24 21:37:23 +0100]:
On 2014-02-24 21:32, Julian Rüth wrote:
In many places we have GPLv2 (without the +)
I hope not, that would be a big problem.
You're right. But there are actually a few:
plot/plot3d/transform.pyx
combinat/words/words.py
On Monday, February 24, 2014 8:34:25 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
However, there is Cython code in the core library that relies on GSL,
and GSL is GPLv3+.I don't think this forces the Sage library to be
GPLv3+, since there is also a GPLv2+ version of GSL with the *same
API*, which we used
Did you open a ticket for that?
On Monday, February 24, 2014 9:46:38 PM UTC+1, Julian Rüth wrote:
You're right. But there are actually a few:
plot/plot3d/transform.pyx
combinat/words/words.py
combinat/words/word_options.py
combinat/words/word_infinite_datatypes.py
On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:18:00 AM UTC-6, P Purkayastha wrote:
On 02/24/2014 12:22 PM, Evan Oman wrote:
I am using Sage to make visual representations of Graphs(ie of the
vertex and edge variety) via the show command.
However as far as I can tell I can only save these as a
* Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com [2014-02-24 13:15:25 -0800]:
Did you open a ticket for that?
Not yet. I do not have access to trac from this machine. I can create a
ticket later today.
julian
pgpjxOBzubZ8e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO GPLv3+ is the recommended license by the FSF. What exactly is there to
fix?
The Sage developers decided when GPL3 was coming out (years ago) to
keep the library GPLv2+ compatible, but the distribution has to be
Somebody needs to update this: http://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
No. First we need the proposals and we evaluate and rank them. This
means, everyone discusses them, gives them a number from 0 to 10, and
we set their
Is there actually somebody that replaces half a dozen libraries with almost
decade-old versions and then uses that to run/develop Sage? It might have
been possible back then, but it sure sounds extremely unlikely now.
On Monday, February 24, 2014 10:37:18 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
On Mon,
IMHO a potential graphics glitch (doesn't even happen with matplotilb, I
was just citing what the relevant OpenGL specs say) is still preferable to
having a perfect rendition of the wrong plot. Which is the current state.
On Monday, February 24, 2014 9:42:07 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Hello,
I am a student and I would like to participate in SoC. I have
already posted about my interest on working about the implementation of
Knot Theory. Is it necessary that the message be forwarded to mentors or
any other mailing list other than this one ?? Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 25,
* Julian Rüth julian.ru...@fsfe.org [2014-02-24 22:28:37 +0100]:
* Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com [2014-02-24 13:15:25 -0800]:
Did you open a ticket for that?
Not yet. I do not have access to trac from this machine. I can create a
ticket later today.
This is now
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:13:28AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:09 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought of one more issue here. Has the new branch of sagenb where the
report a bug link goes to ask.sagemath instead of the Google doc gone live
yet?
I just saw this on HackerNews:
http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2014/02/starting-to-demo-the-wolfram-language/
I understand that they are trying to release the mathematica cloud thing
sometime this quarter. This video (above) is kind of interesting. The
cloud interface to mathematica is
On 2/24/14 1:22 AM, P Purkayastha wrote:
On 02/24/2014 01:55 AM, Robert Lipshitz wrote:
Hi,
When I add a 3d plot to a polyhedron plot, it doesn't just return a
new plot object but also changes the polyhedron plot. On the other
hand, adding two 3d plots does not change either of them. For
On 2/24/14 3:21 PM, Evan Oman wrote:
On Monday, February 24, 2014 1:18:00 AM UTC-6, P Purkayastha wrote:
On 02/24/2014 12:22 PM, Evan Oman wrote:
I am using Sage to make visual representations of Graphs(ie of
the vertex and edge variety) via the show command.
However
I apologize for cross-posting to both here and on support, but I haven't gotten
any responses after several days, and so perhaps this is a better group for my
question...
I compiled 6.1.1 on OSX Lion. The compile went flawlessly. I did
./sage -i openssl
make ssl
My goal is to run a Sage
Hello Amit,
I am a student and I would like to participate in SoC. I have
already posted about my interest on working about the implementation of
Knot Theory. Is it necessary that the message be forwarded to mentors or
any other mailing list other than this one ?? Thanks.
There are already
41 matches
Mail list logo
