On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 07:09:53PM -0700, Andrew wrote:
I agree with Dima in that it would be great to have some of the basic
ring theory available in improved. There are some basic deficiencies
with (Laurent) polynomial rings, especially in more than one variable
and it would
Math presumably not Computer Science.
Does Math directorate pay for programmers to write open-source versions
of commercial software?
It is under the NSF-OCI soliciation which is software in any area
(biology, astronomy, physics, chemistry, math, ...). We were not planning
to ask for a
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Jakob Kroeker wrote:
I suggest to think about offering bounties for new reported bugs
When having a course of mathematical software, the teacher could give some
extra point to those who report [new] bugs.
--
Jori Mäntysalo
--
You received this message because you are
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 07:09:53PM -0700, Andrew wrote:
I agree with Dima in that it would be great to have some of the basic
ring theory available in improved. There are some basic deficiencies
with (Laurent) polynomial rings, especially in more than one variable
and it would
On 29 Oct 2014 14:54, Jakob Kroeker kroe...@uni-math.gwdg.de wrote:
In fact, in particular cases active testing was already done by some Sage
developers,
which (I do not know this) probably were not explicitly paid for that
task.
I have certainly fed random inputs to sage and found some that
How hard would it be to switch from the singular interface to the MAcualay2
one for the polynomial stuff?
If we can do that, we could automate an extra pass of the testsuite
consisting on comparing the output from one interface to the other.
Many people doing algebraic geometry research use
On Oct 30, 2014 5:26 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Ordinarily I'd be against this sort of thing, but I agree that this
concept has not proved to be useful - any given maintainer rarely actually
does keep up with things for more than a year or two, though in aggregate
the community does
I uninstalled homebrew and tried again, the build was successful.
I will now build sage-6.4.rc0. Thank you for making this work!
2014-10-29 15:07:19 UTC+1, Volker Braun:
Gcc picks up parts of your homebrew install, you must at least rename
/usr/local before you can build anything with
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29817519
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:42:54 PM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
Dear All!
Dan Bump, Ben Salisbury, Mark Shimozono and I are planning to apply
for an NSF grant for Sage (to fund Sage Days and other Sage related
activities).
Math presumably not Computer Science.
Does Math
Does Math directorate pay for programmers to write open-source versions
of commercial software?
Or are these topics designating novel algorithms and data structures?
Take a look at the list below and decide for yourself. There will always
be mathematics not yet implemented in any
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-29817519
When I saw the title of the article I was sure it was going to say that
checking Sudoku solutions with Sage helps ward off dementia...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To
Math presumably not Computer Science.
Does Math directorate pay for programmers to write open-source versions
of commercial software?
It is under the NSF-OCI soliciation which is software in any area
(biology, astronomy, physics, chemistry, math, ...). We were not planning
to ask for a
13 matches
Mail list logo
