Re: [sage-devel] Mac App PSA

2016-02-27 Thread Ivan Andrus
On Feb 27, 2016, at 2:45 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > > Since that question came up elsewhere: > > The Mac app is built with the Makefile at #19673. > > This has been the case for a while now, its just that nobody found the time > to review the ticket that puts it back

[sage-devel] Re: please vote for making nauty a standard package

2016-02-27 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
> version 2.6 has just been released, with updated (to GPL-compatible) > http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/nauty/COPYRIGHT.txt > > > http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/nauty/ > > thus, once again, please vote on making nauty a standard package. > +1 -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-devel] Re: please vote for making nauty a standard package

2016-02-27 Thread mmarco
+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: please vote for making nauty a standard package

2016-02-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 6:52:03 PM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 4:22:03 PM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> On 2016-02-27 15:35, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> > version 2.6 has just been released >> >> Very good, this obsoletes my previous

Re: [sage-devel] Re: please vote for making nauty a standard package

2016-02-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 4:22:03 PM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2016-02-27 15:35, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > version 2.6 has just been released > > Very good, this obsoletes my previous complaints. Can you first make a > ticket to update nauty (still optional) to this new

Re: [sage-devel] Re: please vote for making nauty a standard package

2016-02-27 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-02-27 15:35, Dima Pasechnik wrote: version 2.6 has just been released Very good, this obsoletes my previous complaints. Can you first make a ticket to update nauty (still optional) to this new version? Otherwise there is not much point in voting. -- You received this message

Re: [sage-devel] Re: please vote for making nauty a standard package

2016-02-27 Thread David Joyner
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > version 2.6 has just been released, with updated (to GPL-compatible) > http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/nauty/COPYRIGHT.txt > +1 > > http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/nauty/ > > thus, once again, please vote on making

Re: [sage-devel] Should the 2015 Spies Prize be accorded to Nathann Cohen?

2016-02-27 Thread William Stein
On Saturday, February 27, 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 10:46:22 PM UTC, William wrote: >> >> Lest this thread goes any further, Nathann wrote to me offlist: "There >> is no way on earth that I will accept this." >> >> So no point in

[sage-devel] Re: please vote for making nauty a standard package

2016-02-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
version 2.6 has just been released, with updated (to GPL-compatible) http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/nauty/COPYRIGHT.txt http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/nauty/ thus, once again, please vote on making nauty a standard package. On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 9:29:43 PM UTC, Dima

Re: [sage-devel] Re: The Sage Project (Nathann Cohen)

2016-02-27 Thread Christian Stump
> > I had to involve outside investors, and I may have to do so again in the > future. They put their personal money on the line, and will have a > say about how profits might get used, if there are ever any profits I was always a supporter of SMC since I think you are building a great tool

[sage-devel] Mac App PSA

2016-02-27 Thread Volker Braun
Since that question came up elsewhere: The Mac app is built with the Makefile at #19673. This has been the case for a while now, its just that nobody found the time to review the ticket that puts it back into the Sage repo. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-devel] Should the 2015 Spies Prize be accorded to Nathann Cohen?

2016-02-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 10:46:22 PM UTC, William wrote: > > Lest this thread goes any further, Nathann wrote to me offlist: "There > is no way on earth that I will accept this." > > So no point in continuing this discussion. It would be like trying to > give a Fields medal to

Re: [sage-devel] trac password

2016-02-27 Thread Ralf Stephan
I didn't even think it was possible. I'm underwhelmed. Okay, that solves everything discussed. However, trying to log in at wiki.sagemath gives a server error. Just FYI. And thanks for the patience. On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:20 AM Francois Bissey < francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] trac password

2016-02-27 Thread Francois Bissey
Well, I quite often look into my browsers’ settings to recover a password in the clear. Or do you use a special password generating software? François > On 27/02/2016, at 21:13, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > Also, the fact that my by browser knows the password and I can change

[sage-devel] [7.1 beta3] unable to present graphics. [RichReprWarning]

2016-02-27 Thread Jianping Pan
I was running the version 7.1 beta3 sage on my OS X EI Capitan, and it failed to give me the graphic file for me. The same code works well on sage notebook no matter through sage cloud or local notebook interface. Thanks very much!

Re: [sage-devel] trac password

2016-02-27 Thread Ralf Stephan
Also, the fact that my by browser knows the password and I can change the SSH key on trac will not help me with git trac, which needs the trac password IN CLEAR and will store it IN CLEAR on the machine. I mean if you are into security you would rather trust the password from the browser. And so