Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 7.1 build fails on patch

BTW we do have build/tox.ini to automatically test our build-time scripts against multiple Python versions. But only if you add testcases to build/test/. On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 11:49:44 PM UTC+1, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 3:24:13 PM UTC-7, David Roe

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 7.1 build fails on patch

On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 3:49:44 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 3:24:13 PM UTC-7, David Roe wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Dima Pasechnik >> wrote: >> >>> we now decompress tarfiles with python >>> >>>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 7.1 build fails on patch

On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 3:24:13 PM UTC-7, David Roe wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >> we now decompress tarfiles with python >> >> https://docs.python.org/2/library/tarfile.html >> >> and all the features of it are only in

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 7.1 build fails on patch

we now decompress tarfiles with python https://docs.python.org/2/library/tarfile.html and all the features of it are only in Python 2.7. Hmm... On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 9:35:24 PM UTC, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > Is that the entire log? If not, could you please post it? Although it >

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 7.1 build fails on patch

We changed to using Python to uncompress tarballs, so an out-of-date version of Python could cause this. What does "python --version" say? (Should we check the Python version in ./configure?) John On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 2:35:24 PM UTC-7, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > Is that the

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 7.1 build fails on patch

Is that the entire log? If not, could you please post it? Although it looks like you have an issue with not having a high enough version of python (IIRC, this is needed for the bootstrapping) or something is wrong with your tar. Best, Travis On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 4:25:35 PM UTC-5,

[sage-devel] Sage 7.1 build fails on patch

I just failed to build Sage 7.1 on my work server, on which I have built many previous versions. Any ideas? patch-2.7.5 Setting up build directory for patch-2.7.5 Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bot confusion

done for librae Vincent On 22/03/16 17:17, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: @ all patchbot owners, could you please set "max_behind_commits" to 0 in your json config file ? This may prevent the bots to go on misbehaving until the next beta.. Frederic Le mardi 22 mars 2016 08:37:12 UTC+1, Frédéric

[sage-devel] Re: bot confusion

@ all patchbot owners, could you please set "max_behind_commits" to 0 in your json config file ? This may prevent the bots to go on misbehaving until the next beta.. Frederic Le mardi 22 mars 2016 08:37:12 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : > > Hello, > > the patchbots seem to be very confused

[sage-devel] Re: referencing a tag in reference manual from a tutorial

facepalm: found an example in thematic tutorials; it turns out one can just do :ref:`sage.bla.foo` everywhere in the docs, not only in the reference manual/library code. On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 11:47:57 AM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > How can this be done? I understand how to use :ref:

Re: [sage-devel] mails from trac marked as spam?

Ah! Thank's for checking this out. I don't really know how that came there, maybe an error by me. But for example I have no idea about the DKIM key. However, now this is txt and spf is gone: $ dig +short sagemath.org txt "v=spf1 a:trac.sagemath.org ?all" and the site verification ... I hope

Re: [sage-devel] mails from trac marked as spam?

On 03/22/2016 05:43 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Seems like it works better now? However, we could add a SPF TXT line to > the DNS of sagemath.org? I.e. my idea is, that by including the sender > explicitly in this "v=spf1 include: ?all" entry, the > score would get pushed higher (no longer

[sage-devel] Re: size of labels for plots with same xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax

I'm going to bet this is http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11160 or http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10657 appearing as a surprise even when there aren't any explicit options set? Actually maybe it's http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12591 On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 5:00:04 AM UTC-4, Samuel

[sage-devel] referencing a tag in reference manual from a tutorial

How can this be done? I understand how to use :ref: within a document, e.g. across the tutorial, but how about referencing something. Say, just something that can be referred to by a label, e.g. a section title r"" .. blah: Blah blah == foo "" somewhere... Thanks, Dima -- You

[sage-devel] Re: online documentation and "long time"

On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 9:53:42 AM UTC, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > > > Le mardi 22 mars 2016 10:38:43 UTC+1, Harald Schilly a écrit : >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 9:49:29 AM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >>> >>> >>> Shouldn't the "long time" stuff appear anyway in the online

[sage-devel] Re: online documentation and "long time"

Le mardi 22 mars 2016 10:38:43 UTC+1, Harald Schilly a écrit : > > > > On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 9:49:29 AM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> >> >> Shouldn't the "long time" stuff appear anyway in the online >> documentation? >> > > Well, do you have any idea how to do that? > > It's easy:

Re: [sage-devel] mails from trac marked as spam?

On Friday, March 18, 2016 at 3:39:47 PM UTC+1, Daniel Krenn wrote: > > On 2016-03-18 14:55, Harald Schilly wrote: > > I have no idea about trac's email setup, can you forward me the source > > code of one of such emails? My guess is, that it doesn't properly sign > > the email, etc. > > The

[sage-devel] Re: online documentation and "long time"

On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 9:49:29 AM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > > Shouldn't the "long time" stuff appear anyway in the online documentation? > Well, do you have any idea how to do that? -- harald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-devel] size of labels for plots with same xmin, xmax, ymin, ymax

On the documentation page for plotting http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/plotting/sage/plot/plot.html there is the following example: Here we give only one row: sage: p1 = plot(sin,(-4,4)) sage: p2 = plot(cos,(-4,4)) sage: g = graphics_array([p1, p2]);

[sage-devel] online documentation and "long time"

The page http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/plotting/sage/plot/plot.html has this: Pi Axis sage: g1 = plot(sin(x), 0, 2*pi) sage: g2 = plot(cos(x), 0, 2*pi, linestyle = "--") sage: (g1+g2).show(ticks=pi/6, tick_formatter=pi) # long time # show their sum,

[sage-devel] bot confusion

Hello, the patchbots seem to be very confused by the 7.1 release. It may come from a bug in the patchbot code. Maybe the situation will go back to normal with the first beta of 7.2. I remember patchbots being troubled by exact release, but not as severely as this time. Could somebody please