[sage-devel] Re: Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

The webpage from the Madrid server opens but contains no Sage cell. My web browser is Chrome on Mac. Accessing from Asia might be a cause. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[sage-devel] Coming SageMathCell upgrade - please test!

Hello and sorry for cross-posting, I'm trying to maximize visibility. After quite a few changes I have a version of SageMathCell running Sage-7.1 and using Jupyter etc. shipped with Sage, rather than a custom old branch of IPython. User-visible changes should be minimal, but there are some for

[sage-devel] Re: Installing PyX breaks pip

On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 11:50:37 PM UTC+1, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > We have an optional package for PyX-0.10 (recent versions are 0.14). After > installing it pip stops working with the message like > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/home/sc_serv/sage/local/bin/pip",

[sage-devel] Installing PyX breaks pip

We have an optional package for PyX-0.10 (recent versions are 0.14). After installing it pip stops working with the message like Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/sc_serv/sage/local/bin/pip", line 5, in from pkg_resources import load_entry_point File

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: install all pip-installable components of Sage via pip, directly

On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 9:51:03 PM UTC+1, mmarco wrote: > > Would it be possible to ship such a pip repo (with only the packages > needed by sage) in the sage source tarball? Or maybe have two such > tarballs, one with it (so it would allow to compile Sage offline, and > source review

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: install all pip-installable components of Sage via pip, directly

Would it be possible to ship such a pip repo (with only the packages needed by sage) in the sage source tarball? Or maybe have two such tarballs, one with it (so it would allow to compile Sage offline, and source review before compiling), and another that would just rely on downloading packages

[sage-devel] Re: Calculus bug in the latest 7.2.beta: sin(pi*x) returns 0 whenever x > 0

It seems that the assumption (wrongly) thinks that x is integer: sage: assume(x>0) sage: sin(pi*x) 0 sage: cos(pi*x) (-1)^x On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 5:58:07 PM UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Hi, > > In Sage 7.2.beta4: > > sage: assume(x>0) > sage: sin(pi*x) > 0 > > As far as I can

[sage-devel] Calculus bug in the latest 7.2.beta: sin(pi*x) returns 0 whenever x > 0

Many thanks for reporting but who will open the ticket? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

[sage-devel] Calculus bug in the latest 7.2.beta: sin(pi*x) returns 0 whenever x > 0

Hi, In Sage 7.2.beta4: sage: assume(x>0) sage: sin(pi*x) 0 As far as I can tell, this bug has been introduced in Sage 7.2.beta0. Maybe by ticket #20134 (upgrade to pynac-0.6.4) ? Best wishes, Eric. -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: install all pip-installable components of Sage via pip, directly

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 4:20:42 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 4:15:12 PM UTC+1, William wrote: >>> >>> Dima: >>> > sorry, William, I don't see what you mean. >>> [...]

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: install all pip-installable components of Sage via pip, directly

On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 4:20:42 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 4:15:12 PM UTC+1, William wrote: >> >> Dima: >> > sorry, William, I don't see what you mean. >> [...] >> > 2) Putting data on your computer does not equal to installing crud on >> your

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: install all pip-installable components of Sage via pip, directly

On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 4:15:12 PM UTC+1, William wrote: > > Dima: > > sorry, William, I don't see what you mean. > [...] > > 2) Putting data on your computer does not equal to installing crud on > your > > computer, although people wearing tinfoil hats > > might disagree. > > They

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: install all pip-installable components of Sage via pip, directly

Dima: > sorry, William, I don't see what you mean. [...] > 2) Putting data on your computer does not equal to installing crud on your > computer, although people wearing tinfoil hats > might disagree. They do disagree. And they are right. -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: install all pip-installable components of Sage via pip, directly

On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 3:43:15 PM UTC+1, William wrote: > > > > On Sunday, April 17, 2016, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 2:14:09 AM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: >>> >>> >>> > (1) Providing a source tarball from which one can build

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: install all pip-installable components of Sage via pip, directly

On Sunday, April 17, 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 2:14:09 AM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: >> >> >> >>> (1) Providing a source tarball from which one can build Sage without internet access is a basic requirement from a company that provides

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: install all pip-installable components of Sage via pip, directly

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 2:14:09 AM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: >> >> >> >>> (1) Providing a source tarball from which one can build Sage without internet access is a basic requirement from a company that

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: install all pip-installable components of Sage via pip, directly

On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 2:14:09 AM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote: > > > >> >>> (1) Providing a source tarball from which one can build Sage without >>> internet access is a basic requirement from a company that provides >>> some funding for Sage development over the years. We don't >>>

[sage-devel] Re: Does any repository at github.com/sagemath accept Github pull requests?

On Saturday, April 16, 2016 at 11:54:11 PM UTC+2, paulmasson wrote: > > Are all of these repositories used merely for hosting files? > > Does any active development take place purely on Github, i.e., outside of > the Trac system? > > Yes, website and publications. -- h -- You received

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: move SageNB back to Sage

On 2016-04-17 03:27, kcrisman wrote: Last night I was thinking about another issue - the eventual proposed complete removal of sagenb from Sage Just a small addition: even if we switch to Jupyter by default, that doesn't mean that we will drop SageNB immediately. We should still ship it as