[sage-devel] Re: sage fails to build on (fresh install of) debian linux 8.4 (64 bit)...

2016-05-27 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, May 27, 2016 at 11:31:59 PM UTC+1, Eric Larson wrote: > > Any suggestions? From /home/eric/sage/logs/pkgs/sagelib-7.2.log (full log > file attached): > nothing seems to be attached; anyway, it looks like there was a failure to build Sage's atlas package. Please check by looking at

[sage-devel] sage fails to build on (fresh install of) debian linux 8.4 (64 bit)...

2016-05-27 Thread Eric Larson
Any suggestions? From /home/eric/sage/logs/pkgs/sagelib-7.2.log (full log file attached): make[3]: Entering directory '/home/eric/sage/src' python -u setup.py install Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py",

[sage-devel] Re: Sage apps for iOS and Android

2016-05-27 Thread paulmasson
If it helps to know, the Sage app is working fine for me on both my iPhone and iPad. Some cells don't display nicely until the "Evaluate" button is tapped, but otherwise everything appears to function. Perhaps the reported error had to do with changes being made last week on the server. Not

[sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

2016-05-27 Thread parisse
the University may decide to license your code under different conditions (if they make money with it then you will get a part). For more details https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI06278868=LEGISCTA06161633=LEGITEXT06069414=20160527 -- You received this message

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

2016-05-27 Thread William Stein
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:30 AM, rjf wrote: > So you should claim authorship and copyright, and then declare that others > may > use it under whatever restrictions you determine. Personally, I find the > MIT or > Berkeley licenses much better than GPL, since they let anyone

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

2016-05-27 Thread rjf
The point is, if you don't claim authorship, someone else might, and (for example) restrict access, even by you. So you should claim authorship and copyright, and then declare that others may use it under whatever restrictions you determine. Personally, I find the MIT or Berkeley licenses

Re: [sage-devel] NTL new.h patch - singular-related - details?

2016-05-27 Thread Victor Shoup
Sorry if I never got around to dealing with all the patches. I'm will to look at it again, if someone is willing to spell it all out for me :-) On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 10:55:25 AM UTC-4, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > I tried to do archeology once for this one and found nothing conclusive...

Re: [sage-devel] Sage apps for iOS and Android

2016-05-27 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
On Friday, 27 May 2016 00:28:13 UTC-6, Ivan Andrus wrote: > > I’m not sure I trust the debugging facilities, but can’t it seem to load > jquery. However, the url it’s querying works just fine in a desktop > browser or with curl. In fact, it doesn’t seem to have $ defined. > > I finally

Re: [sage-devel] Sage apps for iOS and Android

2016-05-27 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
On Friday, 27 May 2016 00:32:55 UTC-6, Ivan Andrus wrote: > > Also, I see a deprecation warning at http://aleph.sagemath.org/?q=deuoxi > namely: > > sagemathcell.py:29: DeprecationWarning: html(...) will change soon to > return HTML instead of printing it. Instead use pretty_print(html(...))

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

2016-05-27 Thread Erik Bray
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Erik Bray wrote: >> But if there were a contributor agreement I >> could give the Sage project permission to copy / use my code under its >> license

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

2016-05-27 Thread Harald Schilly
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Erik Bray wrote: > But if there were a contributor agreement I > could give the Sage project permission to copy / use my code under its > license without explicitly putting my name on it The problem here is very simple: which legal entity

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

2016-05-27 Thread Erik Bray
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > There is no contributor license agreement. Every file must be GPLv2+ > licensed. If you start a new file you have copyright on that module whether > you put your name in there or not; But we need the GPLv2+ statement

Re: [sage-devel] Copyrights

2016-05-27 Thread Erik Bray
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:15 PM, David Joyner wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Erik Bray wrote: >> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Jeroen Demeyer >> wrote: >>> On 2016-05-26 12:16, Erik Bray wrote: So my

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

2016-05-27 Thread Erik Bray
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > > > On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 12:16:11 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> I don't want to >> claim copyright ownership under my own name > > > > you cannot do that legally, and in some countries of the world

[sage-devel] Re: Copyrights

2016-05-27 Thread Harald Schilly
On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 12:16:11 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: > > I don't want to > claim copyright ownership under my own name > you cannot do that legally, and in some countries of the world this would even lead to a situation where your contribution cannot be used at all. I'm

Re: [sage-devel] Sage apps for iOS and Android

2016-05-27 Thread Ivan Andrus
Also, I see a deprecation warning at http://aleph.sagemath.org/?q=deuoxi namely: sagemathcell.py:29: DeprecationWarning: html(...) will change soon to return HTML instead of printing it. Instead use pretty_print(html(...)) for strings or just

Re: [sage-devel] Sage apps for iOS and Android

2016-05-27 Thread Ivan Andrus
I’m not sure I trust the debugging facilities, but can’t it seem to load jquery. However, the url it’s querying works just fine in a desktop browser or with curl. In fact, it doesn’t seem to have $ defined. I finally figured out that it wasn’t loading because of a security policy that it