[sage-devel] 2 errors in jmol viewer when plotting 3d triangles

When I try the 3d plot commands of polyhedron class and polygon3d on the default jmol viewer, the output doesn't match the command, since I directly copy these commands from examples in tutorials. 1. polygon3d([[0,0,1],[0,1,0],[1,0,0]]) This gives a totally empty graph, though the numbers on

Re: [sage-devel] VotePlugin for trac?

FWIW I think this is not a bad idea, as long as it's effortless to maintain and someone is already volunteering to do it. If I were spending time on developing Sage again instead of wrestling with getting Rob's MBX to work for me ;-) then I think this would help somewhat in prioritizing what I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage fails to build on (fresh install of) debian linux 8.4 (64 bit)...

"./sage -t src/sage/arith.py" gets this. hundleymac:sage jahundle$ ./sage -t src/sage/arith.py init.sage does not exist ... creating no stored timings available Running doctests with ID 2016-07-07-13-47-14-67aaeb78. Git branch: develop Using --optional=mpir,python2,sage Doctesting 1

Re: [sage-devel] Doc-testing ouptut with dots

On Jul 7, 2016 07:13, "Andrew" wrote: > > Hi! > > How do you doc-test output that starts with ...? The particular output that I want to test is: > > sage: print(CartanType(['A', oo]).ascii_art()) > ...---O---O---O---O---O---O---O---... > -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 >

[sage-devel] Re: python3 imports

Le jeudi 7 juillet 2016 11:13:52 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > > > On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 8:22:57 PM UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> Essentially, print has now been converted to python3-compatible behaviour >> in all of sage, after a lot of work by many people

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Errors in an old, massive patch for Skew Polynomials in Sage

Hi Arpit, Did you try doctesting other parts of Sage to see whether your segfaults are related to the ticket or not? It could be related to your system setup. If this is not the case, you should, as Travis asked you on an earlier question, try to find a minimal example which causes the bug from

[sage-devel] Doc-testing ouptut with dots

Hi! How do you doc-test output that starts with ...? The particular output that I want to test is: sage: print(CartanType(['A', oo]).ascii_art()) ...---O---O---O---O---O---O---O---... -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 but sage complains with: ValueError: line 6 of the docstring for

[sage-combinat-devel] Re: CartanTypes

This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20973. Andrew On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 22:34:00 UTC+1, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > We also should determine how we want to distinguish between (and input) > A_{+oo} and A_{oo}, i.e., index sets of NN and ZZ. In fact, the only > place where I really

Re: [sage-devel] VotePlugin for trac?

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 5:04:33 PM UTC+1, William wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, July 6, 2016, Erik Bray > wrote: > >> On Jul 6, 2016 17:40, "William Stein" <> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Erik Bray <> wrote: >> > >> > > Alternatively, we can do a

[sage-devel] Re: python3 imports

On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 at 8:22:57 PM UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > Dear all, > > Essentially, print has now been converted to python3-compatible behaviour > in all of sage, after a lot of work by many people > shouldn't we release an update to sagenb, to get these changes there into

[sage-devel] Re: Errors in an old, massive patch for Skew Polynomials in Sage

Hello, My apologies for not being able to get back sooner. I was working on a separate ticket this week. And there were some compile errors after Sage upgraded to 7.3beta6. I've fixed those and pushed the changes. Sage now builds and running Sage allows access to the functionalities in the

Re: [sage-devel] inverse of units

On 2016-07-06 22:17, Vincent Delecroix wrote: > Indeed > {{{ > sage: parent(~1) # parent changes > Rational Field > sage: parent(1.inverse_of_unit()) # same parent > Integer Ring > sage: 2.inverse_of_unit() # error > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... >