[sage-devel] Re: Git repository should have Sage versions as branches not tags

2016-07-17 Thread Volker Braun
Don't know, possibly nobody On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 11:06:37 PM UTC+2, Paul Masson wrote: > > Thanks. > > Another question: who closes Issues and Pull Requests on Github that have > been marked ready for closure? > > On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 1:56:38 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: >> >>

[sage-devel] Re: Git repository should have Sage versions as branches not tags

2016-07-17 Thread Paul Masson
Thanks. Another question: who closes Issues and Pull Requests on Github that have been marked ready for closure? On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 1:56:38 AM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote: > > done > > On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 11:19:21 PM UTC+2, Paul Masson wrote: >> >> The mirror actually has three

[sage-devel] Re: libtinfo.so.5: no version information available

2016-07-17 Thread Dominique Laurain
In order to get version information (required by shell): objdump -x libntl.so check symbolic links, for example in my local install (Ubuntu 14.04, sage-6.9) I have in the sage-src/sage-6.9/local/lib directory two links: libntl.so and libntl.so.16 pointed to the dynamic library file

[sage-devel] Re: libtinfo.so.5: no version information available

2016-07-17 Thread leif
Harald Schilly wrote: > > > On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 2:49:12 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_PRELOAD set? > > > No, nothing like that is set. I also tried to clean up and start > building again, but it did appear again. It's also a bit strange, >

[sage-devel] Re: Two seeming inconsistencies in BooleanFunction - should I report these as bugs?

2016-07-17 Thread Nils Bruin
These issues are now tickets https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21038 and https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21039 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: Two seeming inconsistencies in BooleanFunction - should I report these as bugs?

2016-07-17 Thread Paul Leopardi
Hi Nils, I have now done a small amount of investigation, and my results and replies are below. All the best, Paul On Thursday, 14 July 2016 8:15:35 AM AEST you wrote: > On Thursday, July 14, 2016 at 6:18:16 AM UTC-7, Paul Leopardi wrote: > > (1) You can create a BooleanFunction of 0 variables

[sage-devel] Re: libtinfo.so.5: no version information available

2016-07-17 Thread Harald Schilly
On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 2:49:12 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_PRELOAD set? > No, nothing like that is set. I also tried to clean up and start building again, but it did appear again. It's also a bit strange, because this error seems to come and go

[sage-devel] Re: libtinfo.so.5: no version information available

2016-07-17 Thread Volker Braun
do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH or LD_PRELOAD set? On Sunday, July 17, 2016 at 12:27:27 PM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote: > > Hi, when I'm compiling sage (either from develop or 7.2), I'm getting lots > and lots of error lines like: > > /bin/sh: /ext/sage/7.2/local/lib/libtinfo.so.5: no version

[sage-devel] libtinfo.so.5: no version information available

2016-07-17 Thread Harald Schilly
Hi, when I'm compiling sage (either from develop or 7.2), I'm getting lots and lots of error lines like: /bin/sh: /ext/sage/7.2/local/lib/libtinfo.so.5: no version information available (required by /bin/sh) It's in a docker container, running normal recent ubuntu, and I have no real clue

[sage-devel] Re: Git repository should have Sage versions as branches not tags

2016-07-17 Thread Volker Braun
done On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 11:19:21 PM UTC+2, Paul Masson wrote: > > The mirror actually has three branches. This one hasn't been touched in > over a year: > > https://github.com/sagemath/sage/tree/module-list-cleanup > > Shouldn't it be removed at some point? > > On Wednesday, July 13,