[sage-devel] Re: OS X testers needed

OS X 10.11.6 El Capitan: -- All tests passed! -- Total time for all tests: 5.2 seconds cpu time: 9.8 seconds cumulative wall time: 10.7 seconds On

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage's references: new policy?

Hi, On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 05:48:15AM -0700, Ralf Stephan wrote: > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 1:03:27 AM UTC+2, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > - all references should be, insofar as possible, in a standard form > > > > There is one standard form for everything, even old papers, the

[sage-devel] Typeset output from external packages

Did this used to work? E.g. in a Sage notebook click the [x] Typeset option and then execute: --- %maxima integrate(1/sin(x),x) --- in a cell. My recollection is that this used to use maxima to generate LaTeX and then display it typeset in the worksheet, i.e. the same as ---

Re: [sage-devel] sage4 patchbot

On 2016-09-24 15:58, Thierry wrote: On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:34:33AM -0700, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: sage4 is going on as usual with 7.4.beta6, always giving us generously wrong BuildFailed reports. How was it not blocked when testing ticket 0 ? Perhaps should we require each patchbot to

Re: [sage-devel] sage4 patchbot

On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:34:33AM -0700, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > sage4 is going on as usual with 7.4.beta6, always giving us generously > wrong BuildFailed reports. How was it not blocked when testing ticket 0 ? Perhaps should we require each patchbot to retest ticket 0 at each new beta ?

Re: [sage-devel] sage4 patchbot

sage4 is going on as usual with 7.4.beta6, always giving us generously wrong BuildFailed reports. Frederic Le vendredi 23 septembre 2016 11:12:51 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > > On 2016-09-23 08:51, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > What has that to do with stopping the bot (or monitoring it at all,

[sage-devel] Re: didn't got the trac account.

Thank you very much Harald Schilly. Your work is appreciable, this inspires me to stick to the organization. So it becomes sharing values rather than a project. On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 4:10:24 PM UTC+5:30, Harald Schilly wrote: > > This is taken care of. > > -- You received this

[sage-devel] Re: OS X testers needed

You do have an account on the OSX buildbot in case you forgot ;-) On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 1:04:09 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > If you have an OS X system and want to help Sage and PARI: > > 1. Checkout the branch at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21582 > > 2. Run "./sage -i

[sage-devel] OS X testers needed

If you have an OS X system and want to help Sage and PARI: 1. Checkout the branch at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21582 2. Run "./sage -i -c all-build" 3. Run "./sage -tp --long src/sage/libs/pari" (or "make ptestlong" if you have the time) 4. Report back to sage-devel -- You received

[sage-devel] Re: didn't got the trac account.

This is taken care of. On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 12:29:06 PM UTC+2, B Krishnan Iyer wrote: > > Hello folks!. Actually I had applied for the trac account few days back > and I didn't got any response. Can anyone tell me how can I inquire about > it. > -- You received this message

[sage-devel] didn't got the trac account.

Hello folks!. Actually I had applied for the trac account few days back and I didn't got any response. Can anyone tell me how can I inquire about it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [sage-devel] Re: crash after compiling sagemanifolds sage 7.3 (ppa aims)

Wonderfull :) Thanks a lot Jan and Eric Best regards Henri Le 24/09/2016 à 11:16, Jan Groenewald a écrit : Hi OK, requesting copy to stable PPA on launchpad. Regards, Jan On 24 September 2016 at 11:06, Eric Gourgoulhon > wrote:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: crash after compiling sagemanifolds sage 7.3 (ppa aims)

Hi OK, requesting copy to stable PPA on launchpad. Regards, Jan On 24 September 2016 at 11:06, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > Hi, > > I confirm that the new package sagemath-upstream-binary-full, taken from > the PPA aims/sagemath-dev works well: SageManifolds could be

Re: [sage-devel] Re: crash after compiling sagemanifolds sage 7.3 (ppa aims)

Hi, I confirm that the new package sagemath-upstream-binary-full, taken from the PPA aims/sagemath-dev works well: SageManifolds could be installed in it without any trouble and its test suite is passed. Thanks a lot Jan ! Best regards, Eric. -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] huge virtual memory size when launching 7.3

On 2016-09-21 16:15, Jonathan Bober wrote: (I've swtiched from sage-support to to sage-devel.) I can test and review. See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21582 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group