Re: [sage-devel] linbox 64-bit charpoly

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:18 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:52 PM, William Stein > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Jonathan Bober

Re: [sage-devel] linbox 64-bit charpoly

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:52 PM, William Stein wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote: >> > In the matrix_integer_dense charpoly() function, there is a

Re: [sage-devel] linbox 64-bit charpoly

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:52 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > In the matrix_integer_dense charpoly() function, there is a note in the > > docstring which says "Linbox charpoly disabled on 64-bit machines,

Re: [sage-devel] linbox 64-bit charpoly

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Jonathan Bober wrote: > In the matrix_integer_dense charpoly() function, there is a note in the > docstring which says "Linbox charpoly disabled on 64-bit machines, since it > hangs in many cases." > > As far as I can tell, that is not true, in

[sage-devel] linbox 64-bit charpoly

In the matrix_integer_dense charpoly() function, there is a note in the docstring which says "Linbox charpoly disabled on 64-bit machines, since it hangs in many cases." As far as I can tell, that is not true, in the sense that (1) I have 64-bit machines, and Linbox charpoly is not disabled, (2)

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org >> are down... I've done what I can and right now - files.sagemath.org - rsync.sagemath.org seem to respond to pings. And -

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > I suspect that perhaps the copy I have the works is working because I >> built it as sage 7.3 at some point with SAGE_ATLAS_LIB set and then rebuilt >> it on the develop branch, which didn't get rid of the atlas

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:06:17 PM UTC+2, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 09/26/2016 03:03 PM, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: > > > > Is there a quick fix? > > > > To get something usable, try > > ./configure --with-blas=atlas > > before running "make". I had a similar problem:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:24 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org >> are down... >> > > I'll check on these when I'm next on campus

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 8:42:26 PM UTC+2, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > I suspect that perhaps the copy I have the works is working because I > built it as sage 7.3 at some point with SAGE_ATLAS_LIB set and then rebuilt > it on the develop branch, which didn't get rid of the atlas

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

Thanks, now (and for the next few hours :-) trying... Am Montag, 26. September 2016 21:06:17 UTC+2 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > > On 09/26/2016 03:03 PM, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: > > > > Is there a quick fix? > > > > To get something usable, try > > ./configure --with-blas=atlas >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On 09/26/2016 03:03 PM, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote: > > Is there a quick fix? > To get something usable, try ./configure --with-blas=atlas before running "make". I had a similar problem: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21561 -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

I just tried make after saying "export TARGET=P2". Doing so, openblas starts to build but fails after a while saying ar: sgemm_kernel.o: No such file or directory ../Makefile.tail:40: recipe for target 'libs' failed make[4]: *** [libs] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

I suspect that perhaps the copy I have the works is working because I built it as sage 7.3 at some point with SAGE_ATLAS_LIB set and then rebuilt it on the develop branch, which didn't get rid of the atlas symlinks that were already setup. So maybe it isn't actually using openBLAS. On Mon, Sep

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

I've rebuilt again from scratch, twice. Once after clearing all my possibly questionable environment variables (except for LD_LIBRARY_PATH, since that is needed for gcc-6.1.0, as set by module add gcc-6.1.0 for me). The second time I did "CFLAGS=-mno-xop make". I can see that flag took effect by

[sage-combinat-devel] Fomin's growth diagrams on dual graded graphs

Hi there! At https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21594 I have finally polished my personal growth diagrams code. Comments and patches are very welcome. In particular: * implement backward rules for domino insertion * implement semistandard domino insertion * implement Young-Fibonacci insertion

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

I forgot: martin@Martin-Laptop:~/sage-develop$ lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order:Little Endian CPU(s):4 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-3 Thread(s) pro Kern:1 Kern(e) pro Socket:4 Socket(s): 1

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On my computer, 7.4.beta6 doesn't seem to compile openblas successfully either. After make distclean and make I get an error (log attached). real 135m22.614s user 407m51.656s sys 21m22.276s *** Error building Sage. The following

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org > are down... > I'll check on these when I'm next on campus (probably today). William > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 2:25:52 PM

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:50 PM, leif wrote: > Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:47:00 AM UTC+2, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Dima Pasechnik > > wrote: > > > > > > > >

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org are down... On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 2:25:52 PM UTC+2, leif wrote: > > Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Harald Schilly > > wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016

[sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:47:00 AM UTC+2, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 2:22:51 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober > wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

I now seem to have built a version that doesn't segfault on this, without intentionally changing anything. So I don't know what is going on. I may try another build from scratch, just for the sake of my sanity. On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > >

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote: > > Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect > firewall rule? > > > It was William, I suppose. > Actually, disabling anonymous git:// would perhaps help to reduce

[sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Harald Schilly > wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote: >>> tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch) >>> tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push) >> >> As

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

Didn't we have that problem previously that OS updates would overwrite system config (I'm guessing thats what happened). On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:02:36 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> Somebody killed

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:47:00 AM UTC+2, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > >> >> >> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 2:22:51 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote: >>> >>> I recompiled with gcc 6.1.0, and get the same

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote: > > Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect firewall > rule? > It was William, I suppose. Actually, disabling anonymous git:// would perhaps help to reduce server load, without real functionality

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 2:22:51 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote: >> >> I recompiled with gcc 6.1.0, and get the same segfault. I did a ./sage -i >> gdb to get a better crash report, which is attached. I don't

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac unavailable again?

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: i.e. you should see  trac        g...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (fetch)  trac        g...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push)  Thanks! This works now. -- Jori Mäntysalo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect firewall rule? On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 10:52:13 AM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote: > > this really has to be documented properly. > > just

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > this really has to be documented properly. just added to your ticket a comment, repeating it here: it's not only the git-trac page, but also the "the hard way" page:

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac unavailable again?

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 8:47:12 AM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 8:38:00 AM UTC, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: >> >> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> > please show us the output of >> > git remote -v >> >> origin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac unavailable again?

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 8:38:00 AM UTC, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > please show us the output of > > git remote -v > > origingit://github.com/sagemath/sage.git (fetch) > origingit://github.com/sagemath/sage.git (push) >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: openblas segfault?

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 2:22:51 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote: > > I recompiled with gcc 6.1.0, and get the same segfault. I did a ./sage -i > gdb to get a better crash report, which is attached. I don't know if it is > useful. Also, it mentions some gcc 5.1.0 paths, which seems odd. I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac unavailable again?

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Dima Pasechnik wrote: please show us the output of git remote -v origin git://github.com/sagemath/sage.git (fetch) origin git://github.com/sagemath/sage.git (push) tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch) tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push) trac2

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 8:16:56 AM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Harald Schilly > <> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober <> wrote: > >> tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch) > >> trac

[sage-devel] Re: Trac unavailable again?

please show us the output of git remote -v I suspect you have git protocol (i.e. git://...) remote for fetching, which don't work - you need git@... (i.e. ssh) remotes for both fetch and push. See https://github.com/sagemath/sage_trac_plugin/issues/18 On Monday, September 26, 2016 at

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote: >> tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch) >> tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push) > > As a random idea, since several

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Harald Schilly wrote: or maybe this: git remote add trac2 g...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git git fetch trac2 and see if that works. Works, but then how to checkout tickets after that? -- Jori Mäntysalo

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sagemath-admins] trac not responding

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote: > tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch) > tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push) As a random idea, since several others were also asking me about this: Did you try setting both trac remotes to

[sage-devel] Trac unavailable again?

$ git trac checkout 21592 Loading ticket #21592... Checking out Trac #21592 remote branch u/jmantysalo/note-colons -> local branch t/21592/note-colons... Traceback (most recent call last): . . . git_trac.git_error.GitError: git returned with non-zero exit code (128) when executing "git fetch