[sage-devel] Should ZZ^2 be a submodule of CC^2?

2018-01-18 Thread Simon Brandhorst
Dear all, I am working on ticket #23978 Rich comparison for Modules As part of it I also rewrote the is_submodule function. Currently, we have sage: (ZZ^2).is_submodule(CC^2) False sage: (ZZ^2).is_submodule(QQ^2) True Should that behavior change

[sage-devel] Re: Result of coefficients depends on names

2018-01-18 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 9:17:01 PM UTC+1, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > Should there be a note about that in the documentation of the `poly` > method for symbolic expressions? I'd rather change the name to say rewrite_as_polynomial_in(x). I think it's clear enough that an expression does not

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Example graphs and show()

2018-01-18 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
> > I don't think plot, unlike show, actually goes through and does the > > rendering of the image and discards the result. However, I could be > > wrong about this. > > You were right. After > > perl -e 's/(G|g)\.show\(\)/_=\1.plot()/g;' -p -i.bak >

[sage-devel] Re: Result of coefficients depends on names

2018-01-18 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Mon 2018-01-15 07:00:03 UTC, Ralf Stephan: > > expr.poly(x) does not really make expr a polynomial in x, it's a quite useless method. > If you give no parameter to ex.coefficients() it takes the lexicographically first variable. > So instead of ex.poly(x).coefficients do ex.coefficients(x), and

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package mpfr-3.1.5.p0

2018-01-18 Thread François Bissey
config.log for mpfr would be in local/var/tmp/sage/build/mpfr-/src/ if I am not mistaken. > On 19/01/2018, at 04:30, 'Maria MacCallum' via sage-devel > wrote: > > Not sure which file you mean..? There seems to be no configure file just for > mpfr, I've

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package mpfr-3.1.5.p0

2018-01-18 Thread Dima Pasechnik
log says ABI 32, but you need 64, no? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package mpfr-3.1.5.p0

2018-01-18 Thread 'Maria MacCallum' via sage-devel
Not sure which file you mean..? There seems to be no configure file just for mpfr, I've attached the generated config files I'm off for a few days as of thsi evening, but will be very grateful for any suggestions when I get back! Regards, Maria On Thursday, 18 January 2018 10:57:10 UTC, Dima

[sage-devel] Re: GSoC 2018: mentor application and ideas list

2018-01-18 Thread Harald Schilly
Hello, thank you for everyone's interest. There are a few who are willing to mentor again, but we also need short outlines of potential summer projects. So far, there is just one here: https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2018 for comparison, and maybe also as a source of inspiration, last year is

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package mpfr-3.1.5.p0

2018-01-18 Thread 'Maria MacCallum' via sage-devel
Hi there, I Thanks for the suggestion, get an assembler error, archtecture mis match see attached log I'm off for a few days as of this eveing, but I would be grateful for any ideas Regards, Maria On Thursday, 18 January 2018 10:56:01 UTC, François Bissey wrote: > > Actually given the error

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package mpfr-3.1.5.p0

2018-01-18 Thread Dima Pasechnik
It will help to see the config.log of mpfr (not sure whether current mpfr is known to run on Sparc Solaris...) On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 10:49:22 AM UTC, Maria MacCallum wrote: > > > Could you help me debug the errors? > > Last successfull install of sage that I know here is 6.2 > > > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package mpfr-3.1.5.p0

2018-01-18 Thread François Bissey
Actually given the error it may be a good idea to try gmp instead of mpir to start with. gmp may have better support for sparc than mpir. So before starting the build you should do ./configure —with-mp=amp and then make as you usually do. François > On 18/01/2018, at 23:49, 'Maria MacCallum'

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package mpfr-3.1.5.p0

2018-01-18 Thread 'Maria MacCallum' via sage-devel
Could you help me debug the errors? Last successfull install of sage that I know here is 6.2 On Thursday, 18 January 2018 09:49:19 UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2018-01-17 12:00, 'Maria MacCallum' via sage-devel wrote: > > Trying to run make. > > > > Sparc processor, solaris 11.3 >

Re: [sage-devel] Error installing package mpfr-3.1.5.p0

2018-01-18 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2018-01-17 12:00, 'Maria MacCallum' via sage-devel wrote: Trying to run make. Sparc processor, solaris 11.3 Unfortunately, we don't have any Solaris testing machines. So unless you make such a machine available for testing, I'm afraid that it might be difficult to fix Sage on Solaris

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 8.2.beta3 released (R build failure)

2018-01-18 Thread Vincent Delecroix
I restart a build from scratch and I don't believe that R is responsible in any way. This new build stopped on flint pointing at the same library issue make: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libguile-2.2.so.1: undefined symbol: GC_move_disappearing_link Will investigate further. Vincent On

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Example graphs and show()

2018-01-18 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: I don't think plot, unlike show, actually goes through and does the rendering of the image and discards the result. However, I could be wrong about this. You were right. After perl -e 's/(G|g)\.show\(\)/_=\1.plot()/g;' -p -i.bak