Re: [sage-devel] fflas_ffpack-2.2.2.p0 fails to compile on ubuntu 16.04 running on raspberry pi

The compilation process hasn't had a problem with running out of memory so far, and I'm not so concerned with how long it takes. On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 8:52:12 AM UTC-5, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 1:19:35 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at

[sage-devel] Re: Improving code with AI?

The chance that Machine Learning AI programs will find important algorithmic efficiency fixes in algebraic mathematical implementations seems pretty slim. On the other hand, if you have gobs of code written by high school summer interns just learning Python, it is possible their code is filled

Re: [sage-devel] Nearly self-referential

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:25 PM, kcrisman wrote: > http://sagecell.sagemath.org/?z=eJyryE5O0TC0tDDXBAASWQLV=sage CoCalc version: https://cocalc.com/share/4a5f0542-5873-4eed-a85c-a18c706e8bcd/support/xkcd.sagews?viewer=share and on CoCalc we really do have probably a dozen

[sage-devel] Nearly self-referential

http://sagecell.sagemath.org/?z=eJyryE5O0TC0tDDXBAASWQLV=sage Or, for the lazy, https://xkcd.com/1987/ Randall M. forgot one of the Pythons you could have installed :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [sage-devel] Re: division in Zmod(6)

On 01/05/2018 19:13, David Roe wrote: On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/05/2018 18:31, Nils Bruin wrote: On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 9:10:27 AM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote: Dear all, How should be defined division in non-integral

Re: [sage-devel] Re: division in Zmod(6)

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com > wrote: > On 01/05/2018 18:31, Nils Bruin wrote: > >> On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 9:10:27 AM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote: >> >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> How should be defined division in non-integral domains like Zmod(6)? The

Re: [sage-devel] Re: division in Zmod(6)

On 01/05/2018 18:31, Nils Bruin wrote: On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 9:10:27 AM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote: Dear all, How should be defined division in non-integral domains like Zmod(6)? The following looks a bit incoherent to me PPS: people with access to magma are welcome to report! Magma

[sage-devel] Re: division in Zmod(6)

On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 9:10:27 AM UTC-7, vdelecroix wrote: > > Dear all, > > How should be defined division in non-integral domains like Zmod(6)? The > following looks a bit incoherent to me > > PPS: people with access to magma are welcome to report! > Magma complains about division by a

[sage-devel] division in Zmod(6)

Dear all, How should be defined division in non-integral domains like Zmod(6)? The following looks a bit incoherent to me sage: Z6 = Zmod(6) sage: a = Z6(4) sage: b = Z6(2) sage: b.divides(a) True sage: a // b Traceback (most recent call last): ... ZeroDivisionError: Inverse

Re: [sage-devel] fflas_ffpack-2.2.2.p0 fails to compile on ubuntu 16.04 running on raspberry pi

On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 1:19:35 PM UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Ronno Das > wrote: > > Yes, I'm compiling on the pi. > > Did this ever work? I don't think a RaspPi even has enough memory to > compile some of Sage's dependencies,

Re: [sage-devel] fflas_ffpack-2.2.2.p0 fails to compile on ubuntu 16.04 running on raspberry pi

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:11 AM, Ronno Das wrote: > Yes, I'm compiling on the pi. Did this ever work? I don't think a RaspPi even has enough memory to compile some of Sage's dependencies, especially some of the C++ heavy ones. > On Monday, April 30, 2018 at 5:36:41 PM UTC-5,

[sage-devel] Re: Improving code with AI?

First we should add one of the plain old rule-based linters to our testsuite, imho that would go a long way of maintaining a consistent code style (and avoid trivial review friction). On Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 3:43:23 PM UTC+2, Peter Luschny wrote: > > Hi, > > does such a thing make sense

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error building package python3-3.6.1.p1 Sage 8.1 on Mac

On 2018-04-29 16:54, Christelle Vincent wrote: Doctests interrupted: 2203/3630 files tested You didn't accidentally press CTRL-C, did you? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error building package python3-3.6.1.p1 Sage 8.1 on Mac

On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 10:59:55 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 3:54:08 PM UTC+1, Christelle Vincent wrote: >> >> Well, I don't know if you want to know... But make ptest did end with an >> error: >> >> Doctests interrupted: 2203/3630 files tested >> > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Error building package python3-3.6.1.p1 Sage 8.1 on Mac

On Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 3:54:08 PM UTC+1, Christelle Vincent wrote: > > Well, I don't know if you want to know... But make ptest did end with an > error: > > Doctests interrupted: 2203/3630 files tested > Is this reproducible? (i.e., does it fail at the same spot if you re-run this?) To

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Improving code with AI?

> > The most complicated thing is to make a special-purpose github account to > run this on (because no-one > in their right mind is going to give some shady startup access to their > actual github account, right? > I do not think you need to do this. You can limit access to certain