Le vendredi 7 décembre 2018 07:53:18 UTC+1, Markus Wageringel a écrit :
>
>
> While there will be some overhead due to the conversion from and to Sage,
> it is the same in both cases. In fact, I observe similar times with the
> native Giac that is installed into the Sage environment, when
Good timing https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26782 needs reviewing.
> On 7/12/2018, at 19:59, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Here is the report. There is apparently a problem with our
> install script.
>
> Vincent
>
>
>
> boost-1_66_0
>
Dear all,
Here is the report. There is apparently a problem with our
install script.
Vincent
boost-1_66_0
Setting up build directory for boost-1_66_0
Finished extraction
No patch files found in ../patches
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2018 11:41:23 UTC+1 schrieb Bill Hart:
> All the other systems are using modular methods here, so Roman use the
> modstd library (the command is modStd) in Singular to get those timings.
> Indeed cyclic7 over Q takes about 20s on my laptop in Singular using this
>
Le mercredi 5 décembre 2018 23:44:43 UTC+1, Markus Wageringel a écrit :
>
> Am Samstag, 24. November 2018 23:11:26 UTC+1 schrieb parisse:
>>
>>
>> Giac supports double revlex ordering, this is the order used by the
>> eliminate command of Giac. Geogebra has many examples of eliminate commands
On 2018-12-06 14:07, Simon King wrote:
And if I understand correctly what you said in another post, it is
*dynamically* determined which reference is weak and which reference
is strong. When is it determined? During cyclic gc?
Yes, during GC: that's the only time where it matters. More
On 2018-12-06, Simon King wrote:
> Hopefully it is explained in #26790; I'll have a look...
Sorry, must be another ticket. #26811, I guess.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails
Hi Jeroen,
On 2018-12-06, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> * The domain and codomain store MultiWeakref references to the map,
> where one of those references is weak and one is strong.
And if I understand correctly what you said in another post, it is
*dynamically* determined which reference is weak
On Wednesday, 5 December 2018 23:44:43 UTC+1, Markus Wageringel wrote:
>
>
> I am a bit surprised about some of the Singular results being a lot worse
> than reported in [5], cyclic7 in particular. Perhaps starting this
> computation with some different options can help here.
>
>
> [5]
On 2018-12-06 08:35, Simon King wrote:
Then what will be your reference graph? Or phrased differently:
Where/how will you store coercion maps?
The basic idea is the following (I have not worked out all the details yet):
* The coercion model only stores weak references to anything (domains,
10 matches
Mail list logo
