https://trac.sagemath.org/query?priority=blocker&priority=critical&status=needs_info&status=needs_review&status=needs_work&status=new&milestone=sage-9.3&groupdesc=1&group=status&max=1500&col=id&col=summary&col=component&col=time&col=changetime&col=author&col=reviewer&col=keywords&desc=1&order=chang
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:25 AM David Roe wrote:
>
> It's certainly intentional: see line 662 of sage/rings/integer.pyx. Whether
> it's a good idea is another question. The motivation is as Travis said, that
> None behaves like False. But Python ints don't behave this way, in either
> Pytho
It's certainly intentional: see line 662 of sage/rings/integer.pyx.
Whether it's a good idea is another question. The motivation is as Travis
said, that None behaves like False. But Python ints don't behave this way,
in either Python 2 or Python 3.
I'd be fine with a change so that ZZ(None) rais
Dear Travis,
I basically agree with you, in the sense to fix that what equality means.
At this time, equality of vector spaces does not imply equality of
associated vectors. I think both choices have good reasons. I am not sure
how to collaborate with these issues but I am ready to. Best, Enriqu
