Re: [sage-devel] Re: Help needed with adding user packages as optional/experimental packages

Great! Should they be removed from the wiki? (https://wiki.sagemath.org/SageMathExternalPackages) The list of "official" user packages are now part of the sage documentation. We could keep the wiki for the not yet integrated user packages. Le 08/02/2021 à 01:49, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : The

[sage-devel] Re: Help needed with adding user packages as optional/experimental packages

The first few user packages have been added in 9.3.beta7: ore_algebra, sage_flatsurf, admcycles, slabbe, surface_dynamics. On Wednesday, January 13, 2021 at 7:41:48 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Meta-ticket https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31164 proposes to add user > packages, such as

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sorting output dicts in doctests

Hi John, > > Travis, this relates to ticket #3 which I should be uploading code for > today, so there is nothing to see there yet. The output to one function > will be a pair, True/False and a dict, so this fits with what you said. > What I will do is assign the two parts to variables

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problems with 9.3.beta6 + OS X Big Sur

Please try the current branch on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31344, we have added another fix. On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 6:11:55 AM UTC-8 dwb...@gmail.com wrote: > > Even after applying the fix in #31344 I still get a similar crash building > the documentation. I am attaching my

Re: [sage-devel] lrcalc 2.0

Hi, On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 03:25:12PM +0100, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Hello, > > lrcalc has been upgraded to 2.0: see > Here is a ticket for the upgrade: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31355 > Is it expected that Sage 9.3 support it,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sorting output dicts in doctests

Another option might be to use an OrderedDict. If I understand correctly, this becomes unnecessary in Python >= 3.7 where dict behaves like OrderedDict. If I understand correctly, Sage 9.3 will still support Python 3.6 but Sage 9.4 probably won't, after - Sage Trac ticket 30551 Drop Python

[sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

Hi, a word from my side: I would really like to stop being admin as well and hope someone else can take over. I'm the one writing the application each year and I could this time around, but in general I want to focus on other things after all those years. Despite that, looks like there are

[sage-devel] lrcalc 2.0

Hello, lrcalc has been upgraded to 2.0: see Is it expected that Sage 9.3 support it, or is it safer to keep lrcalc-1.3? Regards. -- Th. Thomas. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Problems with 9.3.beta6 + OS X Big Sur

Even after applying the fix in #31344 I still get a similar crash building the documentation. I am attaching my dochtml.log. Daniel Bump On Friday, February 5, 2021 at 11:24:59 AM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31344 > > On Thursday, February 4, 2021

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Now Accepting GSoC 2021 Mentoring Organization Applications until Feb 19

I'll be happy to mentor a good student, but would prefer not to be admin. I already have a huge load of administrative work daily and would appreciate not to have extra. Le jeudi 4 février 2021 à 15:21:06 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:32 AM 'Travis Scrimshaw' via