Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

If a few people felt the need to delay, that should have an effect. Surely! But indeed there was an (maybe to small) effect in the migration vote. On September 14, I suggested a compromise between David’s first proposal

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 2:16:03 PM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > John, your proposed Oct 1 deadline (from your message on Sep 16) > Sorry, I should have written: "your proposed Oct 1 start date of the vote." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 9:55:09 AM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 9:48:29 AM UTC-7 tobias...@gmail.com wrote: > >> I just had another look at the voting thread, where most votes were >> voiced in the first two days, and the almost-slient discussion thread, >>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 9:48:29 AM UTC-7 tobias...@gmail.com wrote: > I just had another look at the voting thread, where most votes were voiced > in the first two days, and the almost-slient discussion thread, where > mostly a few practical aspects of the migrations were discussed.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

Maybe more to the point, the thread was going in the direction of a general policy discussion about how to conduct votes and how to handle requests for delays. Dima interrupted, unprompted as far as I can see, by bringing back up the particular recent case along with comments about one

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

I just had another look at the voting thread, where most votes were voiced in the first two days, and the almost-slient discussion thread, where mostly a few practical aspects of the migrations were discussed. From this, I don't get the impression that the most voters felt they needed more time

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

I apologize for being indirect. I was responding to Dima's sentence, "... the delay was requested by an individual ..." which implies that there was just one person requesting the delay. I was pointing out, apparently too indirectly, that more than one person had requested a delay, and perhaps

Re: [sage-devel] Error bulding sage-9.7 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 with package python3-3.10.5 and package sqlite-3.36.0

why do you ./configure --with-system-sqlite3=no --with-system-python3=no ? python3.9 on your system is good enough, why do you try to build Python 3.10 on a very old OS? Also, why do you instist on building sqlite3? On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 6:19 AM Andreas wrote: > > Hello, > I've been trying

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Democratic issue: rushing decisions

On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 12:19 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote: > > > > On Friday, October 7, 2022 at 7:05:38 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote: >> >> Dima, presumably you're not talking about me, although I proposed that "we >> start a vote around October 1". > > > I guess he means: