Wish you a happy new year!
A year ago, we successfully escaped from a sinking issue management system.
Hopefully, the new year will save us from the current spiral that's
drowning us.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To
The most recent response in this discussion thread was posted over 3 weeks
ago.
(There has been major activity on PRs linked in some of the posts, though.)
Do we have a timeline for the next step in this effort?
Best wishes for the new year to all members of the Sage community!
Matthias
On
On 12/30/23 13:43, Georgi Guninski wrote:
Just FYI:
def testquotient2():
set_random_seed(1);p=next_prime(10**120);Kx=Integers(p)['x']
l=[Kx.random_element() for _ in range(100)]
return l.count(0)
testquotient2()
27
Hi,
this is because PolynomialRing().random_element() takes an
This is documented (almost). The routine generates polynomials with degrees
in a given range, with by default is -1..2 . It chooses the degree
uniformly (the documentation doesn't specify this), so one would expect 33%
degree -1, i.e., the 0 poly. I have a hard time thinking of situations
Just FYI:
def testquotient2():
set_random_seed(1);p=next_prime(10**120);Kx=Integers(p)['x']
l=[Kx.random_element() for _ in range(100)]
return l.count(0)
testquotient2()
27
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To
