Okay.
On Saturday, January 13, 2024 at 2:22:51 AM UTC+5:30 Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Friday 12 January 2024 at 14:50:54 UTC-5 Ruchit Jagodara wrote:
>
> Okay, so I will make a new function named coefficient_monomials and will
> implement the functionality that Lorenz Panny suggested.
> Thank you
This might be at fault:
sage: coercion_model.analyse(q,e)
(['Action discovered.',
Left scalar multiplication by Multivariate Polynomial Ring in z, q over
Rational Field on Multivariate Polynomial Ring in z, q over Infinite
polynomial ring in F over Rational Field],
Multivariate Polynomial
I am not quite sure I understand how this works / what is used:
sage: pushout(e.parent(), z.parent())
Multivariate Polynomial Ring in z, q over Infinite polynomial ring in F
over Multivariate Polynomial Ring in z, q over Rational Field
sage: coercion_model.common_parent(z, e)
Multivariate
One way or another, no faithful packaging of Sage the distro exists, besides
Sage the distro itself.
The reason is that it's too big, too verbose with it's 400 packages, most of
which are just unpatched PyPI packages, pinned to relatively random versions,
providing Python, Jupyter and Sphinx,
Hm, that's somewhat unfortunate - I don't see how to work around it. I
guess I would have to force all elements to be in P (using the notation of
the example), but this is, I think, not possible.
Do you know where this behaviour is determined?
On Friday 12 January 2024 at 22:09:41 UTC+1 Nils
On Friday 12 January 2024 at 14:30:06 UTC-5 Martin R wrote:
I made a tiny bit of progress, and now face the following problem:
sage: I. = InfinitePolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: P. = I[]
sage: e = z*q
sage: Q. = QQ[]
sage: z*e
z*z*q
Is this correct behaviour?
I don't think it's desperately
On Wednesday 10 January 2024 at 16:59:22 UTC-5 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
When it was discussed whether we wanted to use it, the main objection was
that it needs root (once, explicitly, to set up, then implicitly), thus
unsafe.
Conda was mentioned as a better option. But Conda is much bigger.
On Friday 12 January 2024 at 14:50:54 UTC-5 Ruchit Jagodara wrote:
Okay, so I will make a new function named coefficient_monomials and will
implement the functionality that Lorenz Panny suggested.
Thank you for your help : ) .
I think "coefficients_monomials" is a little clearer. (
On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 09:25 -0800, Niranjana K M wrote:
> Should I have had started by cleaning the previous builds? It may be still
> using old Cython spkg, built when it was sage 10.0 release. Because in venv
> site-packages, it still says
>
Okay, so I will make a new function named coefficient_monomials and will
implement the functionality that Lorenz Panny suggested.
Thank you for your help : ) .
On Wednesday, January 10, 2024 at 8:16:25 PM UTC+5:30 Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 January 2024 at 03:03:09 UTC-8 Martin R
I made a tiny bit of progress, and now face the following problem:
sage: I. = InfinitePolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: P. = I[]
sage: e = z*q
sage: Q. = QQ[]
sage: z*e
z*z*q
Is this correct behaviour? For comparison:
sage: I. = QQ[]
sage: P. = I[]
sage: e = z*q
sage: Q. = QQ[]
sage: z*e
z^2*q
On Friday, January 12, 2024 at 6:38:31 PM UTC+9 Martin R wrote:
I just followed a few of the links Matthias posted today, and I must admit
that I do not understand a word.
That is normal. Just imagine that you are a passenger on a cruise and
happened to enter to the engine room of the ship by
Here's a friendly overview on 9 of the "disputed" PRs, to help potential
volunteer editors find PRs that match their interests -- in case the
community decides that this model of appointing editors is the way to go.
None of them has anything to do with "development philosophy", or with
macOS;
Should I have had started by cleaning the previous builds? It may be still
using old Cython spkg, built when it was sage 10.0 release. Because in venv
site-packages, it still says
sage/venv/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/Cython-0.29.32.dist-info.
What are the right sequence of commands to
On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 08:33 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> One thing I noticed is that you said "master" branch. Please try the
> "develop" branch instead -- that's where the actual development takes
> place. Both Sage and Gentoo are fast-moving and you'll have better luck
> with the latest
I am fighting with various bugs involving substitution / composing into
polynomials, mostly involving the InfinitePolynomialRIng, for example
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37047
I would appreciate help *a lot*.
The background is, that I have mostly implemented a solver for lazy
I am implementing the minimum_generating_set function in Sage, but I am
facing some issues, such as where I should implement that function as my
implementation uses some gap methods. And I found one class ParentLibGAP
which can be used for this but I am not sure because I found that
On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 18:24 +0530, Niranjana K M wrote:
> It is attached in the previous mail.
>
Indeed, sorry, it was my first email of the day. I have to get warmed
up first.
One thing I noticed is that you said "master" branch. Please try the
"develop" branch instead -- that's where the
It is attached in the previous mail.
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, 5:09 pm Michael Orlitzky, wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 20:56 -0800, Niranjana K M wrote:
> >
> > I am running on Gentoo Linux and sagemath is from git master branch.
> > I am having system cython-3.0.6 built on python-3.11.7.
> >
> >
On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 20:56 -0800, Niranjana K M wrote:
>
> I am running on Gentoo Linux and sagemath is from git master branch.
> I am having system cython-3.0.6 built on python-3.11.7.
>
> Please help me to resolve it.
>
Can you post your config.log?
--
You received this message because
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:01 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> From my perspective, throughout these discussions there is a strong
> push against slimming Sage down by removing these unneeded packages
> coming from Matthias, often coupled with responses by him (on
> trac/github) I consider rude and
>From my perspective, throughout these discussions there is a strong
push against slimming Sage down by removing these unneeded packages
coming from Matthias, often coupled with responses by him (on
trac/github) I consider rude and disrespectful of other's opinions.
See e.g.
Does anybody have any idea how the following could happen?
(c is an element of R = InfinitePolynomialRing(QQ, "FESDUMMY"), and I set P
= R.polynomial_ring())
Martin
ipdb> p c.polynomial().parent()
Multivariate Polynomial Ring in FESDUMMY_1, FESDUMMY_0 over Rational Field
ipdb> p R
Multivariate
I just followed a few of the links Matthias posted today, and I must admit
that I do not understand a word.
Karl pointed out that:
> I don't think it's off-topic to once again point out that this way of
phrasing it is very developer-centric. That's not a wrong way to look at
it, but an
24 matches
Mail list logo
