I was going to suggest to use uppercase only for header-like directives,
excluding thereby ".. math::" in particular.
but as Travis expressed, it would be confusing to change a long-held
tradition, unless there is unanimous agreement.
So I will stop here. Thanks for the info and opinions.
On
I think it is more confusing to mix the two. I vote for keeping everything
all uppercase since everything else that is analogous uses all uppercase
letters.
Best,
Travis
On Wednesday, January 31, 2024 at 9:20:58 PM UTC+9 TB wrote:
> On 25/01/2024 7:06, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Our
Sorry for the multiple messages.
For potential mentors, there is no commitment required at this time.
You can also decide later to add a project and/or be a mentor.
Best,
Travis
On Sunday, February 4, 2024 at 1:17:54 PM UTC+9 Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
> For the potential projects, you can
For the potential projects, you can either edit the corresponding wiki page
in Matthias's link or directly post them here (you do not need to be the
mentor).
Also, I would like to have a list of potential mentors. Any SageMath
developer can be a mentor for a GSoC project; so if you are willing
Thank you for doing that. I updated my projects and removed all of those
with named mentors as they have not agreed at present (AFAIK) to be a
potential mentor.
I was expecting to be the main administrator for GSoC again this year. We
will discuss this on the mentors list.
For the proposal,
To get the process started for this year, I have created the page
https://wiki.sagemath.org/GSoC/2024 by copying last year's page, removing a
completed project and adding a new project that I hope to mentor this
summer.
The deadline for our project to apply as a GSoC mentoring organization is
GAP has a function, FactorCosetAction(), for action on cosets of a subgroup. I
don't think there is a need to implement anything of this sort directly, and
not use it via libgap.
https://docs.gap-system.org/doc/ref/chap41.html#X7FED50ED7ACA5FB2
On 3 February 2024 19:50:55 GMT, 'Ruchit
Okay , thank you for your help ! : )
On Saturday, February 3, 2024 at 11:59:31 PM UTC+5:30 David Joyner wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 1:13 PM 'Ruchit Jagodara' via sage-devel <
> sage-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> So, why is the quotient function implemented in Sage is
>> giving
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 1:13 PM 'Ruchit Jagodara' via sage-devel <
sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> So, why is the quotient function implemented in Sage is
> giving RegularActionHomomorphism of G/N ? Is there any particular reason
> for it? Should I change it (because I found a FIXME note
So, why is the quotient function implemented in Sage is
giving RegularActionHomomorphism of G/N ? Is there any particular reason
for it? Should I change it (because I found a FIXME note also, saying that
gap has a better way to find quotient)? I am implementing some functions
related to group
You can lift elements via the quotient map to get representatives of each
coset. I'm not sure that this is wrapped in Sage, but using gap directly
you have:
sage: Pgap = p._libgap_()
sage: Ngap = N._libgap_()
sage: phi = Pgap.NaturalHomomorphismByNormalSubgroup(Ngap); phi
[ (2,3,4,5,6,7) ] -> [
I think this is giving a group isomorphic to the actual quotient group but
I need the actual quotient group. Therefor, I don't know how to find that
exact group. Below is one example,
sage: p = PermutationGroup([(2,3,4,5,6,7)])
sage: N = p.minimal_normal_subgroups()[0]
sage: N
Subgroup
12 matches
Mail list logo
