Ok, so that means that majorly we would have only doc.sagemath.org and
trac.sagemath.org right? wiki.sagemath.org would become a subdomain inside
Trac.
Please correct if I got something wrong.
Sincerely,
Adarsh
On Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 12:15:19 AM UTC+5:30 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> Let's
Hello,
Not sure if I am the best person to answer this (I am not a maintainer).
But as far as I know, the only way to get all dependencies correct would be
to build from scratch. Because one thing is linked symbolically in many
places, so to update all of them would require a complete build
?
On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 1:24:33 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
> Can I make these changes in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33688 as
> discussed? The ticket has not been closed yet
>
> On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 12:44:36 PM UTC+5:30 David Coudert wrote:
>
>> Yo
Can I make these changes in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33688 as
discussed? The ticket has not been closed yet
On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 12:44:36 PM UTC+5:30 David Coudert wrote:
> You are right, this can be removed too.
> And I'm not sure a parallel version of Boruvka's algorithm is
com schrieb am Dienstag, 12. April 2022 um 15:55:16
> UTC+2:
>
>> I think I might get how to do it. Can I open a ticket for this?
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 12:11:05 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>
Oh! Thank you
On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 1:55:05 AM UTC+5:30 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> Cython files are now discovered automatically. There is no need to add the
> name of the pyx file anywhere.
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 10:21:44 AM UTC-7 adarsh.k...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> Ok,
Ok, then in the new version of Sage what is the equivalent file I should
look?
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 9:57:56 PM UTC+5:30 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> This is outdated. I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33694 to
> update the documentation.
>
> On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at
I think I might get how to do it. Can I open a ticket for this?
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 12:11:05 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was going through the file `SAGE_ROOT/src/sage/graphs/spanning_tree.pyx`
> and I found this in the TODO section
> [im
can open a ticket to correct this if you want
>>
>> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:53:30 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
>>
>>> Okay, then I think that line should be removed right? It can be
>>> misleading to potential contributors
>>>
>>&g
I had a similar problem with Sage v9.6.beta4 on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
(https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/ZYaVBloUbF0) in that PyTest was
not detected by Sage.
I found that running
```
./sage -i pytest
```
solves the problem.
However, based on another conversation it was pointed out that
I can open a ticket to correct this if you want
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:53:30 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
> Okay, then I think that line should be removed right? It can be misleading
> to potential contributors
>
> On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:31:02 PM UTC+5:30 D
Okay, then I think that line should be removed right? It can be misleading
to potential contributors
On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 12:31:02 PM UTC+5:30 David Coudert wrote:
> This query has been added in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/10433.
> I don't think that priority queue can be of any
I checked this on my SageMath v9.6.beta5 on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, and it checks
out
[image: Screenshot from 2022-04-03 14-58-46.png]
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 2:57:35 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
> By the way, f.expand() is not wrong. The expression is identically equal
> to 0 f
Which version of Sage are you using? And on which platform?
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 10:44:59 AM UTC+5:30 a.simpl...@gmail.com wrote:
> The following code
>
> > var("z y z")
> > f = (x-y)^2*(y-z)*(z-x) + (y-z)^2*(z-x)*(x-y) + (z-x)^2*(x-y)*(y-z)
> > f.expand()
>
> outputs 0.
> But
> >
I would suggest keeping all three 'a-', 'ar-', 'arc-' as aliases for the
same function (we could keep the 'a-' as the default as it is the shortest
to type). This is because I have seen all three versions being used across
Computer Science and Mathematics, and restricting anyone of them would
Hi,
I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33571 for this purpose. I
have also pushed the changes on my branch as I had pointed out. Anything
else I can help in?
On Saturday, March 26, 2022 at 11:28:10 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
> Certainly, I will read up on the proc
ric_graph.py
>> ```
>>
>> [image: Screenshot from 2022-03-25 17-41-13.png]
>>
>> and I believe several other inconsistencies would be existing.
>> On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 1:21:23 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>&
-13.png]
and I believe several other inconsistencies would be existing.
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 1:21:23 PM UTC+5:30 Adarsh Kishore wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am running Sage v9.6.beta4 on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. I was going through the
> online documentation of Sage and I came across
ok. Thank you for the information
On Thursday, March 24, 2022 at 4:53:19 PM UTC+5:30 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> ./sage -i
> is at the moment equivalent to
> make
>
> - but we should deprecate it.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 11:14 AM Adarsh Kishore
> wrote:
>
I looked it up on the Sage developer documentation at
https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/tools.html
The relevant command to be run is
```
./sage -i pytest
```
from SAGE_ROOT. Running this, pytest works fine now.
[image: Screenshot from 2022-03-24 16-01-23.png]
Thanks, everyone for the
Hi everyone,
I am running Sage v 9.6.beta4 on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS system. When I run
doctests on it, it skips the doctests involving pytest, saying that
```
Pytest is not installed, skip checking tests that rely on it.
```
[image: Screenshot from 2022-03-24 11-02-42.png]
I installed pytest using
21 matches
Mail list logo
