I have been informed in some communication with SX folks that they do not
do this, as a matter of policy. When they first started I guess they may
have done so a few times, but definitely not now. So one would have to
keep ask.sagemath running in read-only mode or something even if this were
see inline below:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Francois Bissey
francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On 19/04/13 22:33, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote:
config.log coming here as attachment!
In local/lib, what does:
objdump -T libatlas.so | grep dgemm
says?
kjetil@kjetil-HP
see inline below.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Francois Bissey
francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On 19/04/13 22:55, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote:
see inline below:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Francois Bissey
francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On 19/04/13 22:33
I think this is the same problem I earlier reported on sage-5.8 (on
Lubuntu 12.10)
Here is the output from make:
---
Default path = /home/kjetil/sage/sage-5.9.beta5/local /usr /usr/local
---
checking for
For what it is worth, I now tested sage/5.9.beta4.
The exact same problem as reported in this thread occured there!
Kjetil
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen
kjetil1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks!
Here comes the config.log, as attachment.
Kjetil
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013
OS version information:
kjetil@kjetil-HP-Pavilion-dv4-Notebook-PC:~$ lsb_release
LSB Version:
core-2.0-amd64:core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-amd64:core-3.0-noarch:core-3.1-amd64:core-3.1-noarch:core-3.2-amd64:core-3.2-noarch:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch
kjetil@kjetil-HP-Pavilion-dv4-Notebook-PC:~$ gcc
brinchmann Halvorsen wrote:
OS version information:
kjetil@kjetil-HP-Pavilion-dv4-Notebook-PC:~$ lsb_release
LSB Version:
core-2.0-amd64:core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-amd64:core-3.0-noarch:core-3.1-amd64
:core-3.1-noarch:core-3.2-amd64:core-3.2-noarch:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noar
ch kjetil@kjetil-HP
see inline below.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:25 PM, François Bissey
francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:13:06 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote:
This file as attachment here!
Can you do the following for me:
start a sage shell: go in /home/kjetil/sage/sage-5.8
Thanks! See inline below.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:47 PM, François Bissey
francois.bis...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:41:06 Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen wrote:
see inline below.
Not pretty. There is a bit of a mystery as to why -latlas doesn't give you the
right libraries
see inline.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/327311/how-are-pythons-built-in-dictionaries-implemented
has many good answers, it seems.
Wow. And they flagged it as non constructive. These guys are great.
see inline!
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
This is most likely a bug in GCC.
Could you try to install the package
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/gcc-4.7.1.spkg
and compile again?
This is to check whether using vanilla
Hello!
I definedexport SAGE_CHECK=yes
and then typed make. result:
.
.
.
real104m51.462s
user132m19.104s
sys 5m54.034s
Error building Sage.
Problem wher PARI. following is that logfile:
/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 1/6, 1/7, 1/8, 1/9, 1/10]
? getheap
! [102, 10177]
? print(Total time spent: ,gettime);
! Total time spent: 16
Kjetil
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Kjetil brinchmann Halvorsen
kjetil1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I defined
13 matches
Mail list logo
