Many thanks Nils for your help.
I think that is important that sage has consistent and easy to use
interfaces, that functions do what most people would expect them to do
at every place. Specially if we want it to be used in calculus
classes, etc.
Writing something like
SR(0).function(x)
, not?
Pablo
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble with some piecewise constant functions.
Suppose that I define
f=Piecewise ([([0,1],0),([1,2],x-1)])
Then f.integral() works as expected, but f.derivative() will fail with
TypeError
Hi,
I'm having trouble with some piecewise constant functions.
Suppose that I define
f=Piecewise ([([0,1],0),([1,2],x-1)])
Then f.integral() works as expected, but f.derivative() will fail with
TypeError: 'sage.rings.integer.Integer' object is not callable
It seems that Sage does not
Hi,
Just in case someone is interested, there will be two events in
computational mathematics in Uruguay:
school:
http://cdsagenda5.ictp.it/full_display.php?email=0ida=a13262
workshop:
https://www.fing.edu.uy/eventos/focm2014/
best regards
Pablo
--
You received this message because you are
!
On 25 September 2014 17:02, Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just in case someone is interested, there will be two events in
computational mathematics in Uruguay:
school:
http://cdsagenda5.ictp.it/full_display.php?email=0ida=a13262
workshop:
https://www.fing.edu.uy/eventos
Hi
I cannot login to the trac web interfase.
I have tried to reset my password, and I have received an e-mail
with a new password, but it didn't work!
(I have tried both using Chromium and Iceweasel (Firefox) on
Debian GNU Linux)
My username is pdenapo
best regards
Pablo
--
You received this
Hi,
I'm teaching a probability course right now, and using Sage for doing
some graphics
for my class notes.
I've found that GSL implements a lot of probability distributions that
are not wrapped by Sage.
The problem was reported at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11572
and a patch is
I've tried to put this comment also on track,
but I cannot login eventhough I've requested (and received) a new password!
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm teaching a probability course right now, and using Sage for doing
some graphics
for my
Hi,
I wanted to tell you about a social network for
researchers that a collegue told me about,
and seems to be a useful idea.
https://www.researchgate.net/
I might be that we can use it somehow to
promote Sage and the research using it.
best regards
Pablo
--
You received this message because
Hi,
[I've tried to post this to sage-release but it failed]
I've tried to build Sage 4.7.2 rc0 on a 64 bits Debian GNU/Linux (wheezy/sig)
[Intel core I5 procesor]
The build failed (compiling Atlas)
Here are the eror messages
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.1 (Debian 4.6.1-15)
gcc -V 21
Yes, that was exactly what happend!
a second make worked!
and I don't know why!
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:21 PM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 25 Okt., 21:24, Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
I've tried to build Sage 4.7.2 rc0 on a 64 bits Debian GNU/Linux (wheezy/sig)
[Intel
Hi Burcin,
Many thanks!
I see that with this patches, it would be esasy to have also a Weyl
algebra implementation in Sage
Cheers,
Pablo
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi Pablo,
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:49:39 -0300
Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to perform computations with linear differential operators
whose coefficients are polynomials
in several variables (in Euclean space).
Has Sage some support for this kind of computation?
Could you suggest
Hi,
I need to perform computations with linear differential operators
whose coefficients are polynomials
in several variables (in Euclean space).
Has Sage some support for this kind of computation?
Could you suggest me some tool for doing that?
For instance assume that you have two first order
Hi,
Though Sage has some extensive support for Riemann zeta function and
L-series (through. lcal) , it seems to
have no function for computing some common generalizations of it, like
Hurwitz zeta function o Lerch trascendent.
I've found through the article in wikipedia that in
Many thanks to Juan Arias de Reyna and Fredrik Johansson !!
Pablo
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Fredrik Johansson
fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Though Sage has some extensive support for Riemann zeta function
Please review ticket #10620 to upgrade sphynix
Pablo
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I also prefer trac, but I know why: it's shorter! Also it's more clearly
related to trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac . Patch comments also say stuff like
trac #1234,
I agree that it is a bad policy to ship binaries in a source distribution.
I would suggest a separate package for MAC OS with the binaries of the
compiler if this is reallly needed
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:30 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
On 26 Okt., 12:39, Volker Braun
No, my point is that gfortran is not distributed with sage in source form.
I think that we should either
'- include gfortran in source form in sage distribution
- split the binary files in a separated file
otherwise it is not a source distribution.
)but a mix of a source and a binary one. This
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:24 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
No, my point is that gfortran is not distributed with sage in source form.
I think that we should either
'- include gfortran in source form in sage
...@uam.es wrote:
On 24 oct, 17:48, Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I've seen the video contributing to Sage where W. Stein mentioned
the translation of the tutorial to Spanish as
a possible contribution to sage.
Indeed, some parts of the tutorial have been already translated
Hi,
I've a problem with generating the documentation (Spanish translation
of the tutorial)
I've converted the attachment of ticket #7222 to utf using iconv
iconv -f latin1 -t utf8 tour_help.rst tour_help-utf8.rst
and after that
mv tour_help.rst tour_help-utf8.rst
(This seems to be needed,
Hi
I've seen the video contributing to Sage where W. Stein mentioned
the translation of the tutorial to Spanish as
a possible contribution to sage.
Indeed, some parts of the tutorial have been already translated into
Spanish by Luis V. (12 months ago) However, the translations are
disseminated
have you tried running sage -docbuild es/tutorial html ?
Yes, but I've got the message
'es/tutorial' is not a recognized document. Type 'sage -docbuild -D' for a list
of documents, or 'sage -docbuild --help' for more help.
it seems like this directory es/tutorial needs to be added to some
I've succeded in solving this problem: the new language (es) needs to be
added to the global variable LANGUAGES
in doc/common/builder.py
many thanks
Pablo
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Pablo De Napoli pden...@gmail.com wrote:
have you tried running sage -docbuild es/tutorial html ?
Yes
In my experience the files that needs more resources when building Sage are
the ones in the sage interfase for linbox
(i.e. src/interfaces/sage/linbox-sage.C)
It would be really nice if something can be done to speed up the
compilation of this file
and make it use less memory (so that sage can be
I really think that spliting users into developers and non
developers is very much against the spirit of open source
Any barrier of entrance to development is against that.
Moreover, I think that the idea of that all the environment has to be
controlled when building sage and therefore all the
KDE Software Compilation 4.4-beta2 includes a software called Cantor
that has offers a GUI
for Sage
See: http://kde.org/announcements/announce-4.4-beta2.php
Description
Cantor is an application that lets you use your favorite mathematical
applications from within a nice KDE-integrated
Many thanks to everybody for your help.
some questions/remarks:
1) ¿Does every function needs to have two versions: a symbolic one and
a numerical
one?
2) the current implementation treats f(x)=sin(x) as a symbolic expression
sage: f(x)=sin(x)
sage: f
x |-- sin(x)
sage: type(f)
type
Hi
I'm trying to do some computations with Bessel functions using Sage.
Unfortunately, they don't seem to behave like other functions. For example:
to get the plot of the sine function over the interval (0,100)
plot(sin(x),(x,0,100))
works. However,
plot(bessel_J(0,x),(x,0,100))
does not.
It would be really nice if we can include the new weapper for the lcalc
library.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5396
[marked ad with patch, neeeds review]
Pablo
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Sage 4.3.alpha0 is out! Sage 4.3 now
Building sage-4.2 on my Ubuntu machine failed (64 bits amd, Karmic Koala)
when building gnutls
host system
uname -a:
Linux ubuntu 2.6.31-14-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 16 14:05:01 UTC
2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I have left the following comment on the blog...
However, the GPL means that people cannot realistically use SAGE in a
commercial tool, either as a platform/runtime, or as an embedded
component.
What it is the justification for this claim? Why wouldn't the GPL
allow one to use SAGE as a
Hi,
I'm thinking about presenting a talk on Sage on the next Python
Argentina 2009 conference
which will be held in Buenos Aires on next September. and is
organized by Pyar (the Python user group of
Argentina, http://python.org.ar/pyar/)
(If you can read Spanish, you can find the details about
Hi,
I want to ask about the status of wrapping lcalc library
(ticket #5396)
I would be interested in helping with that, but there is no patch yet.
Pablo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On relative slow hardware it looks like a good idea to make
installation of ATLAS and e.g. FLINT less time consuming.
Well, for ATLAS we don't even run the test suite, so what you see at
the moment is as close to optimum as it gets. You can reuse a
previously build ATLAS (assuming we
Therse are really excelent news!, that will make Sage much more easy
to install on Linux systems.
Many thanks!!
Pablo
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
Hello all,
As of today, Sage 3.0.5 is available in Debian sid, so you can now run
apt-get install
I see that the file skpg-install for flint needs to be modified in final
releases to avoid runing the test suite.
I think it would be better to have for example an environment variable like
SAGE_RUN_FLINT_TESTSUITE (and run the test suite or not depending on the value
of that variable) that
SAGE_CHECK=yes does that for every spkg, adding 50+ env variables for
all the spkgs seems like a bad idea and won't automatically force the
test suite when we want it to be tested.
I agree. 50+ env-variables is not a good idea.
SAGE_CHECK is ok
Cheers,
Pablo
We will likely upgrade to Python 2,6 first. It will be a while until
all the Python components we include work with Python 3.0 and I doubt
people around want to do all the work. There also has to be a clear
benefit of switching to Python 3.0 - we don't do it just because we
can :)
Indeed,
I've tried to watch at the videos on Linux using vlc, xine and
mplayer but I
failed.
Here are the error messages when running
vlc craig_citro.mov
on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy):
VLC media player 0.8.6e Janus
[0304] mp4 demuxer error: MP4 plugin discarded (no moov box)
[0283] main
Hi,
I've tried to watch at the videos on Linux using vlc, xine and mplayer but I
failed.
It would be nice if you could upload the videos in ogg-thedora format
which is an open format (I think that we, the open source comunity need to
strongly support the use of open formats, and ogg-thedora
I think that it would be important to change the extension to .tar.bz2
so that the sage packages get recognized by standard systems tools.
(For instance, try to open a spkg with a filemanager like midnight
commander...)
May be we can change
foo.spkg
to
foo.spkg.tar.bz2
This way the package
One good reason for using the 2.4.x version of pari (and not the 2.3.x stable
branch) [although this might be bad for gp2c) is that the 2.4.x has some
functions that are not present in the stable branch.
For instance, it has a function polhermite that computes the Hermite
polynomials that
I've submited a patch for integrating gp2c into sage
gp2c is a program that converts a gp script into a C program.
description of my patch
This patch implements two functions for the Gp object: gp2c_compile_file and
gp2c
The first one compiles a file using gp2c-run and load its into the
Hi,
I'm reading the notes of William's talk Three Lectures about Explicit
Methods in Number Theory Using Sage, that are indeed very interesting.
It comments that Sage includes functionallity to compute the zeros of L-series
of elliptic curves, by doing
sage: E = EllipticCurve(’389a1’)
sage:
Also one could like to do similar computations for instance with Dedekind
zeta function of a number fileld, something like...
sage: K.sqrt2 = QuadraticField(2)
sage: Z.DedekindZeta()
sage: Z.zeros(10)
it would be
sage: K.sqrt2 = QuadraticField(2)
sage: Z=K.DedekindZeta()
sage:
I know this is off topic, but I think that this conference that it is been
organized here in Buenos Aires (by a collegue at my university)
might be of interest to some Sage developers.
bests regards
Pablo
MACIS 2008 - Third International
Also there seems to be two blocker bugs...
package zodb for python 2.25 (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=472392
(mantainer refuses until zodb3.8 is uploaded...)
linbox
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480092
(this one is fixed by version 1.1.6~rc0-2, mail by
Hi,
I just want to ask about the status of the effort to get sagemath into Debian
I think this should be a goal of highest priority for us, since it is
important in order to get sage widely used.
Pablo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
* getting rid of functions which implicitly assume left/right and making
those functions explicitly say what they are returning, since, for
example, a vast majority of linear algebra people would assume kernel()
is the right kernel, while apparently a sizable contingent of number
Hi Chris and others,
Certainly there are betters ways to do that.
For this and similar problems in propositional logic,
I would suggest to wrap a SAT solver.
(see the article on wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT_solver##Algorithms_for_solving_SAT
and the ticket #418
Wrap minisat
The first bunch of SAGE dependencies entered the Debian NEW queue (the
queue of packages waiting for review from the Debian ftpmasters before
they are uploaded to Debian unstable) tonight; by tomorrow I expect that
that the remaining SAGE dependencies will enter the Debian NEW queue.
There is a free library for quantitaive finance called quantlib
http://quantlib.org/
The library is writen in C++ but comes with python bindings.
The licence is modified BSD (http://quantlib.org/license.shtml) (wich is
GPL-compatible)
Perhaps you might want to integrate it into sage
The more
I should say that one thing that I really like from the current site
is the explanation of what is Sage in the front page, from
General and Advanced Pure and Applied Mathematics
to .. Download SAGE for Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux
I would suggest to keep this perhaps in a section about sage
Hi,
I've posted into ticket #258 a patch for integrating gp2c into Sage.
Obviously this may still have bugs, so it needs to be reviewed by
someone that understands the details of how gp comunicates
with Sage.
Some remarks on the class Gp in interfaces/gp.py?
Shouldn't this class have a
I've managed to solve the problem: The package
texlive-cyrillic (in Debian/Ubuntu) is needed to build the Sage
documentation.
Pablo
El Tuesday 01 January 2008 21:25:35 Pablo De Napoli escribió:
When building Sage documentation
(make in devel/doc), I've got a strange message
(I quote below
Hi,
I've working in ticket #258 (integrating gp2c into sage)
I've created a gp2c package (that requieres a minor modification in the
pari spkg so that pari.cfg file gets installed properly, as described
in the ticket)
Even though it remains to do the integration with sage, you might want to
When building Sage documentation
(make in devel/doc), I've got a strange message
(I quote below the output)
output
TEXINPUTS=/media/hda2/pablo.new_home/sage/sage-2.9/devel/doc-main/commontex:
python /media/hda2/pablo.new_home/sage/sage-2.9/devel/doc-main/tools/mkhowto
--html --about
please consider fixing bug #1282
make flint.spkg depend on python
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1282
which is maked for 2.8.15 milestone
Pablo
On Dec 3, 2007 9:16 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
I'm currently working on ticket #329
My idea is adding to each .spkg file a .spkg.md5 file with the md5checksum
This should prevent file corruption.
I've already reimplemented the md5sum standard utility (from the
coreutils package) in python (using the md5 module), so that we
don't need to add
PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/21/07, Pablo De Napoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently working on ticket #329
My idea is adding to each .spkg file a .spkg.md5 file with the md5checksum
This should prevent file corruption.
Are you literally adding to each .spkg file. If so,
make sure
Hello,
I'm receving an error message
502 - Bad gateway
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
when trying to access to
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/
(through an http proxy)
Pablo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group,
On 9/11/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/9/07, Dan Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But sage -t reports lots of errors, and spent an hour or two in
sage -t devel/doc-2.8.4.1/ref/sage.misc.trace.tex
before I killed it. If these errors are surprising, let me know
Thank you for your comments on my patch
It is a legitimate concern, I agree (and could affect many
number-theoretical or similar functions); and the principle of
solution that you are proposing could be a good one. (I like the idea
of writing some code in cython that calls pari directly, I don't
Hi,
I've submitted a patch
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/628
for making binomial work as one would
expect for symbolic expressions, in cases like this:
sage: n=var('n')
sage: binomial(n+1,n-1)
n*(n + 1)/2
by defining binomial(x,m)=binomial(x,x-m) whenever x-m is an
integer.
This
Simpy is indeed an interesting package and could be useful in a future
for rewriting the
calculus package (replacing maxima)
However. rather than incorporating it into Sage as a package, I feel
that we will need to take some of it code and re-write it to fit well
into Sage.
This is because,
The idea of incorporating Ginac into Sage was discussed some time ago
in this list.
Now I see that in its page there is a link to some python bindings for Ginac
http://pyginac.sourceforge.net/
This could be useful for us, however they use boost rather than cython/pyrex
Pablo
One more comment:
I see that this project is not actively maintained, in fact in its
e-mail list the last e-mail is from 2005...
On 9/8/07, Pablo De Napoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea of incorporating Ginac into Sage was discussed some time ago
in this list.
Now I see that in its page
Hi,
upgrading to sage-2,8 failed on my Gentoo system with the following messages:
(when building linbox-20070812)
checking for correct ltmain.sh version... no
configure: error:
*** [Gentoo] sanity check failed! ***
*** libtool.m4 and ltmain.sh have a version mismatch! ***
*** (libtool.m4 =
If you want to create an IDE for sage, probably the best thing to do
would be start from some python IDE, perhaps some IDE that
supports plug-ins, I don't know if there is any.
Pablo
On 8/10/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/9/07, Ted Kosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the
Certainly no, not everything from a public institution is in the
public domain. This
should be analyzed case by case.
In case of doubt it would be better to ask the author.
Pablo
On 7/31/07, Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I've ended up using Hida and Bailey's quad-double package.
In this case, the license does not says that it is in the public domain
(but that it is a copyrighted work!), but you can use it as
AS IS.
I think that the only condition that is imposed to us is
to include the declaimer.
Pablo
On 7/31/07, Pablo De Napoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Certainly
great work, Jonathan!
I've tested, and I've found the following problems:
1) part 1 hangs
2) compiling with -Wall gives this warning
part.cc:865: warning: unused variable 'temp2'
3) part without arguments returns 42
Pablo
On 7/29/07, Jonathan Bober [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is
William (and others):
There is a licence issue about Sage raised by GPL-v3, that may be you
need to consider
(I'm not a lawyer so that what I'm saying could be wrong).
Currently according to the COPYING file, Sage is released under GPL version 2.
The problem is that some packages included in
This problem seems to be fixed in pari-2.4.2
(not yet realead!, code in CVS)
?numbpart((5*10535+4))
time = 16 ms.
%2 =
I've tested it but seems to be buggy:: it works up to 156
./part 156
p(156)=
73232243759
but for 157 gives a floating point exception error
(and a gdb tracing says it is in the line 176 of
the source code
r2 = r0 % r1;
in function g
I've compiled it using
gcc part.c -g -lmpfr -lm
Your version did work for me!
Pablo
On 7/27/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/27/07, Pablo De Napoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tested it but seems to be buggy:: it works up to 156
./part 156
p(156)=
73232243759
but for 157 gives a floating point exception
be UNIX_LINUX, UNIX_HURD or UNIX_FREEBSD)
+#endif
+
# Determine the offset of a component 'ident' in a struct of the type 'type':
# See 0 as pointer to 'type', put a struct 'type' there and determine the
# address of its component 'ident' and return it as number:
On 7/24/07, Pablo De Napoli
In fact, trying to upgrade from sage-2.6 on a Linux x86 host failed, with
the following error messages (when building f2c,related to this)
cd spkg ./install all 21 | tee -a ../install.log
make[1]: se ingresa al directorio `/hdc1/pablo.hdc1/sage/sage/spkg'
sage-spkg installed/f2c-1 21
f2c-1
Hi,
I would like to generate (my own) binary distribution of sage for an x86-machine
However, when compiling I've noticed that some packages use the
optimizations for my own machine (for example mpfr uses -march=athlon, etc)
How may I build a generic x86 binary-distribution?
thanks,
Pablo
Hi,
I see that sage has a method for computing the quotient and reminder
of the integer
division called quo_rem (in integer.pyx)
However, there exist a standard operator in python call divmod: in
sage divmod does
not work as one would expect.
sage: ZZ(2).quo_rem(ZZ(3))
(0, 2)
sage:
Another difference (in favor of Sage) is that Sage is that Sage is
distributed as sourcecode, whereas the others are binary-only
distributions. Usually, the binary programs sizes are much smaller
that in source form.
On 5/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh. To be fair, you
): attempt to optimise Integer constructor
-- Rishikesh (2007-02-25): changed quo_rem so that the rem is positive
-- David Harvey, Martin Albrecht, Robert Bradshaw (2007-03-01): optimized Integer constructor and pool
+-- Pablo De Napoli (2007-04-01): multiplicative_order should return
sorry for the inconvenience, I've sent it again since it was not mentionated
in the sage-2.5 milestone.
(And so.. I didn't know if you had received it or perphaps it was lost with
the spam..)
Pablo
On 4/13/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/13/07, Pablo De Napoli [EMAIL PROTECTED
to see what he's done so far.
- Robert
On Mar 31, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Pablo De Napoli wrote:
Hi,
I want to ask you some questions concerning the arithmetic of number
fields in Sage.
Does Sage currently support factoring in Gaussian integers (i.e. in
the ring
Z[I] of complex numbers
, Pablo De Napoli wrote:
Does Sage currently support factoring in Gaussian integers (i.e. in the
ring
Z[I] of complex numbers with integral real/imaginary parts)?
I thing this would be a nice feature to have.
In pari/gp for example this works:
? factor(5*I)
%1 =
[2 + I 1
I've build sage-2.4-rc3 on my machine:
(Gentoo/Linux 2.6.20.4 x86 AMD Duron)
Al test were also passed.
Also I've installes the optional packages gap_packages and database_gap
without problems
best regards
Pablo
On 3/25/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all your
I've found an inconsistency in Picewise doc string:
Currently Picewise? shows the following docstring
Docstring:
list_of_pairs is a list of pairs (fcn,I), where fcn is
a SAGE function (such as a polynomial over RR, or functions
using the lambda notation), and
I've installed the gap packages _after_ doing the tests.
Pablo
On 3/25/07, Hamptonio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed 2.4-rc3 on a powerpc g4 powerbook. I had 4 tests fail,
but it looked like that was because I didn't install the gap
packages. The four failures were:
sage -t
90 matches
Mail list logo
