Hi all,
Simon King (replying to my question) wrote:
- Do the methods coming from ElementMethods always take priority over
(override) those from the base classes?
No, it is the other way around.
Right, and if I now understand correctly, it is because
Element.__getattr__() changes the
Hello,
Robert Bradshaw wrote,
It's live, but you'll need to go to a closed ticket of yours and add
?force to the url (something like
http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/13657/?force ) so it picks up the
'resolution' field even though the page didn't change. (I'll run a
script to update
RingElement! This should clearly be fixed. Shouldn't there be a class
SquareMatrix for methods like is_invertible() and determinant()?
Thanks again,
Peter
Op vrijdag 13 september 2013 20:23:21 UTC+1 schreef Peter Bruin:
Hello,
A discussion was just started at http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket
Hello,
A discussion was just started at http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15192about the
reason why categories in Sage have a class ElementMethods. In
this ticket, Julian Rüth moved the method is_unit from RingElement to
Rings().ElementMethods to fix a certain bug. I thought this wasn't the
Hi Marco and all,
I had Darij's problem as well, and many others probably did as well.
In a right action, I would prefer p(1) to give a warning. In a right
action, I would want some notation where p is on the right, preferably
1^p (1 hat p).
That would make sense (except that I don't
, associative,
unital,
noetherian, lie, finite-dimensional, or whatever you like. But don't
mention the
*absence* of axioms!
Best regards,
Peter Bruin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Gefeliciteerd, Jeroen!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
