On Thursday, February 6, 2014 8:38:28 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2014-02-06 03:41, anne1.s...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:49:15 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2014-02-04 09:20, Anne Schilling wrote:
but it keeps reappearing.
On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 12:49:15 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2014-02-04 09:20, Anne Schilling wrote:
but it keeps reappearing.
What you mean with this?
How can I tell make not to install semigroupe any longer then?
Anyway, I did
export SAGE_PORT='yes'
and now I can at
Here is another broken optional package. At least it prevents me from
building 6.1:
Error building Sage.
The following package(s) may have failed to build:
package: semigroupe-2.0-2
log file: /Applications/sage/logs/pkgs/semigroupe-2.0-2.log
build directory:
And in fact another one that we installed during the Sage Days in Davis:
make: *** [build] Error 1
:sage anne$ more /Applications/sage/logs/pkgs/cchache.log
Attempting to download package cchache
Checking online list of optional packages.
[.]
Checking online list of experimental packages.
[.]
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/coding_basics.html#the-pickle-jarsays:
Warning Sage’s pickle jar helps to ensure backward compatibility in sage.
Pickles should only be removed from the pickle jar after the corresponding
objects have been properly deprecated. Any proposal to remove
On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:30:12 AM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2014-01-10 17:23, Anne Schilling wrote:
Any objections?
I thought the policy was to *never* remove old pickles?
It was suggested by Volker, see
http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15575#comment:39
Otherwise, can
I get the same error as Simon!
Anne
On Wednesday, January 8, 2014 10:40:24 AM UTC-8, Simon King wrote:
Am Dienstag, 7. Januar 2014 17:23:53 UTC+1 schrieb Nicolas M. Thiéry:
Did anyone stumble on errors like this when compiling the
documentation?
I just met a very similar yet
On Thursday, December 26, 2013 5:12:13 PM UTC-8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Volker Braun
vbrau...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I've been working on a git trac subcommand to complement the git suite
with trac integration instead of the separate UI that the
Hi Ivan,
No worries! I was cc:ed on the ticket, so I already saw that you had posted
an updated version of the spkg.
Everything works again for me.
Thanks,
Anne
On Friday, November 15, 2013 11:00:24 AM UTC-8, Ivan Andrus wrote:
Anne,
I'm really sorry. I meant to get back to you sooner,
Yes, I have the same problem (actually, since UC Davis just swallows spam,
I do not get to see the e-mails
any longer at all!).
Anne
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
Hi Kuai,
Perhaps you mean?
{{{
sage: P = Poset(([1,2,3,4],[[1,2],[1,4],[3,4]]), linear_extension = True)
sage: G = P.hasse_diagram()
sage: P1 = Poset(([1,2,3,4],[[1,3],[1,4],[2,4]]), linear_extension = True)
sage: G1 = P1.hasse_diagram()
sage: G.is_isomorphic(G1)
True
sage:
I just did apt-get install graphviz graphviz-doc, so graphviz is now
installed system-wide. This may make it so you don't have to build it
from source.
Fantastic! Thank you very much!
Anne
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-devel
On 7/3/13 6:21 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Dear category fans,
One of the features introduced by the category patch #10963 is a new
category for algebras that are not necessarily associative nor unital.
This is a call for suggestions and votes for a good name for it.
- ``Algebras``:
Hi Simon,
I don't really like magma algebra or magmatic algebra, but that's
mainly because
I never heard anyone using this notion before. I'd rather describe an
algebra as a
module over an appropriate operade than call it magma algebra.
What I'd prefer is very simple: Just say algebra
14 matches
Mail list logo
