[sage-devel] Re: # tol disables the meaning of ellipsis in doctesting

2013-04-15 Thread cschwan
Are you sure about lines 670 and 671? These point to docstrings in my case. Anyway, I have created a bug for this: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14451. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-devel group. To unsubscribe from this group and

[sage-devel] Re: # tol disables the meaning of ellipsis in doctesting

2013-04-15 Thread cschwan
Thanks! This is sufficient for me to experiment with it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-devel group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

[sage-devel] # tol disables the meaning of ellipsis in doctesting

2013-04-14 Thread cschwan
Hi, I just discovered that a doctest in 5.9beta5 with the # tol keyword is not able to use the ellipsis properly. In particular, I tried to patch the doctest in sage/numerical/mip.pyx at line 2031. The expected output contains the version string of GLPK which I want to replace with the

[sage-devel] Re: sage gentoo prefix

2011-04-12 Thread cschwan
On Apr 12, 4:24 pm, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote: Wow, this sounds really interesting. IMHO replacing our homegrown SPKG system with a more general and commonly used system would be great. Reusing code, and all that. It would also allow us to use the power of `emerge -C` to, say,

[sage-devel] Re: Does ECL need readline or termcap ?

2010-11-12 Thread cschwan
Hi, On Nov 11, 5:05 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: I was just looking at a file in Sage, which lists the dependencies for ECL:. It has: $(INST)/$(ECL): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(MPIR) $(INST)/$(TERMCAP) \                  $(INST)/$(READLINE) $(INST)/$(BOEHM_GC) which means

[sage-devel] Re: Does ECL need readline or termcap ?

2010-11-12 Thread cschwan
On Nov 12, 9:39 am, I csch...@students.uni-mainz.de wrote: Hi, On Nov 11, 5:05 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: I was just looking at a file in Sage, which lists the dependencies for ECL:. It has: $(INST)/$(ECL): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(MPIR) $(INST)/$(TERMCAP) \      

[sage-devel] Re: sage-python in SAGE_ROOT

2010-09-17 Thread cschwan
I think it can be deleted from SAGE_ROOT (we did this on gentoo and it works well), but of course you have to adjust some files: spkg- install, sage-spkg-install and sage-make_devel_packages. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group,

[sage-devel] what if SAGE_ROOT/local != SAGE_LOCAL ?

2010-08-05 Thread cschwan
Hi, our work with sage-on-gentoo has seen great progress - we are now able to supply fully working and recent versions of Sage which live in / usr. We did this (among other things) by setting SAGE_LOCAL=/usr SAGE_ROOT=/usr/share/sage This enables Sage to put all scripts and binaries into

[sage-devel] Re: what if SAGE_ROOT/local != SAGE_LOCAL ?

2010-08-05 Thread cschwan
There are six python files which would need a patch and more than five (we need only small numbers of scripts from sage_scripts). You may have look and the patches here: - http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/cschwan/sage-baselayout-4.5.1-fix-SAGE_LOCAL.patch - http://www.students.uni-mainz.de

[sage-devel] Re: sage-on-gentoo status at version 4.4.4

2010-06-30 Thread cschwan
On 30 Jun., 16:05, Georg S. Weber georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote: Great work! Actually, it makes me think about installing Gentoo just to test this (I do know I don't have the time for this, but it does wet my mouth nevertheless). I take this as a compliment - thanks ! Two further

[sage-devel] Re: sage-on-gentoo status at version 4.4.4

2010-06-29 Thread cschwan
On Jun 29, 1:03 pm, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote: [..] excellent summary [..] If have been reading this far - thank you for your time. Christopher may add comments on anything that I forgot. One thing: - We do not install scipy_sandbox but instead apply the patches from this

[sage-devel] Re: What shall we do about ATLAS?

2010-06-07 Thread cschwan
For the ebuild you may take a look at http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sci-libs/blas-atlas/blas-atlas-3.9.23.ebuild?revision=1.1view=markup , which is the ebuild for 3.9.23 (there are newer ebuilds, but they contain patches which most likely fail). If you are not used to

[sage-devel] Re: sets/set.py failing - Primes() Set(QQ) Expected True, Got False

2010-06-03 Thread cschwan
There are actually two: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9121 http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9004 -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more

[sage-devel] Re: Why is the executable 'sympow' copied to local/lib/sympow?

2010-05-25 Thread cschwan
this behaviour: http://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/blob/master/sci-mathematics/sympow/sympow-1.018.ebuild (see lines 27 to 55). I think this could be adapted for Sage, too, but this would be more difficult because one cannot assume ${SAGE_LOCAL} to be /. No idea why the current scheme

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Gentoo - Random SIGABRT failures on exit

2010-05-22 Thread cschwan
@Willem: I took the suppression file from Sage's valgrind.spkg - this filtered a lot meesages. @Paulo: valgrind --db-attach=yes --freelist-vol=1 python /usr/share/sage/local/bin/sage-ipython does not work for me - valgrind prints only a message while starting, but does not show summary

[sage-devel] Sage on Gentoo - Random SIGABRT failures on exit

2010-05-16 Thread cschwan
Hello, porting Sage to Gentoo progresses well, we now have a split version where all all dependencies of Sage are installed with portage. Unfortunately, we experience serious problems on amd64 when exiting Sage. When doing so, there is a slight chance of getting a SIGABRT error, which is always

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Gentoo - Random SIGABRT failures on exit

2010-05-16 Thread cschwan
I already tried valgrind but it did not work - how do I exactly use it ? When I run sage -valgrind -t -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/ categories/examples/algebras_with_basis.rst I get: -- | Sage Version 4.4.1,

[sage-devel] Sage on Gentoo - a status report and some suggestions

2010-02-15 Thread cschwan
Hello, since this is my first post on this list I think it is a good idea to briefly introduce myself: My name is Christopher Schwan, I am studying physics at Uni Mainz (Germany) and I am one of the maintainers of sage-on-gentoo (http://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo). Francois Bissey

[sage-devel] Re: Sage on Gentoo - a status report and some suggestions

2010-02-15 Thread cschwan
Though these would be good to fix, I'm wary of all of the above for a stabilization release. Oh, I overlooked the most important part: Stabilization release - the tickets wouldnt serve that purpose, of course. Nevertheless, these would be the ones which I would like to see fixed :) . Sounds