, so either
linking /dev/shm to /run/shm or changing the mount point might fix it, i.e.
sudo rm -rf /dev/shm sudo ln -s /run/shm /dev/shm
SNIP
I just checked on my Ubuntu 12.10 based box which I booted by accident and
/run/shm is a link to /dev/shm:
mabshoff@buildbox:~$ mount | grep
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:45:13 AM UTC+2, pang wrote:
Hello!
I have downloaded a sage 5.8 binary for an atom 64 bits server, and it
worked.
Until you invoke something that uses mulltiprocessing :)
Then I tried to build a secure server. It takes more work than it did
On Monday, February 11, 2013 11:52:19 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
On Monday, February 11, 2013 8:22:00 PM UTC, mabshoff wrote:
These days unfortunately there are components like libgap which make a
port significantly more work and due to the way memory is managed in GAP,
at least back
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:38:26 AM UTC+1, kcrisman wrote:
Thanks to JP Flori and a number of other people on finding better flags
etc. for Cygwin, you might be surprised about some of the spkgs now on
Windows, they might not need as much work as before.. can't speak for Pari
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 5:28:54 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
SNIP
If I were to do any work on Sage I would pick up where I left since in
2009
I actually did a port of Sage 4.0 to a mixed MSVC/MingW environment to
the
Please note that Cygwin did not stand still since
:
On 6 February 2013 22:02, Minh Nguyen mvngu...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:13 AM, mabshoff
mabs...@googlemail.comjavascript:
wrote:
it has been a while, i.e.summer 2009 or so, and I no longer have
my trac
account password nor do
On Wednesday, February 6, 2013 10:41:25 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
There's a ticket for valgrind upgrade to 3.8.1...
I guess it did not get merged because no one cares except a Mac user but
there is some trouble on Apple^TM because it is coded so that only Apple
copimler can build
On Thursday, February 7, 2013 3:48:01 AM UTC+1, jason wrote:
On 2/6/13 7:26 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:13 AM, mabshoff mabs...@googlemail.com
javascript: wrote:
it has been a while, i.e.summer 2009 or so, and I no longer have
my trac
Hello folks,
it has been a while, i.e.summer 2009 or so, and I no longer have my trac
account password nor do I recall the email address I used. Anyway, attached
is a patch that fixes sage -valgrind. Did not see any ticket on track, but
I noticed that at least the valgrind 3.8.1 spkg is coming
On May 30, 12:51 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/30 Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com:
On my dell laptop running archlinux, my build from scratch fails at
eclib. I've extracted the relevant part from install.log and posted
it at
On May 30, 10:20 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/30 Andrzej Giniewicz ggi...@gmail.com:
Hi,
tried to do some test, but I have similar issue as Vlad reported on
sage-support for 4.0rc0 in topic building sage 4.0.rc0 with gcc 4.4.0
and glibc 2.10.1 fails (on arch
Hello folks,
for various reasons I am taking a break from release management. Post
4.0.rc0 I have merged only a few patches that can be found in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc1/
and should simply be reimported. It would also be good if someone
could deal
On May 22, 1:46 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi,
I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
are in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
I must say, it's looking better on Solaris
On May 21, 1:19 am, gsw georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
SNIP
using ABI=32
CC=gcc -std=gnu99
CFLAGS=-O2 -mpowerpc -no-cpp-precomp -force_cpusubtype_ALL
CPPFLAGS=
CXX=g++
CXXFLAGS=-O2 -mpowerpc -no-cpp-precomp -force_cpusubtype_ALL
MPN_PATH=
Hi,
I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
are in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0/rc0/
Once I get online I will post more info, but I am sure this will take
a couple hours. Sorry.
Cheers,
Michael
Merged in Sage 4.0.rc0:
#6104
On May 20, 6:41 am, bourbabis bourba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Sage team.
Hi,
While doing some engineering calculations with Sage, I've encountered
some problems requiring computational geometry algorithms. So I've
snooped around and found CGAL. Are you aware this set of tools
exists ?
On May 20, 12:11 am, Mickael Gastineau amgastin...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Mickael,
After a check with the authors of the CeCILL-C license, they confirm
that CeCILL-C is not immediately compatible with the GPL.
But the CeCILL-C is compatible by transitivity with the GPL. The
On May 20, 3:00 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
I won't be there by 3:00, but later this afternoon would be good.
Sounds good; I did not get food yet, and this is becoming urgent. Just
setup a time, and I'll be there!
I would like to build this on top of a
On May 19, 3:49 pm, David Harvey dmhar...@cims.nyu.edu wrote:
On May 19, 11:41 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, in this case it is completely ironic that the zn_poly 0.9 code
in FLINT is compiled, but not used since it causes a doctest failure
in the Monsky code. When
On May 19, 4:54 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Is there any chance of you sending me the patch? Don't bother if rc0 is
going to be out in the next day or two.
4.0.rc0 was supposed to drop last night, but I had been up for 22
hours and did not feel
On May 19, 6:31 am, Kevin Horton khorto...@rogers.com wrote:
As an experiment, I attempted to build sage-4.0.alpha0 on an EeePC 901
Linux, with the stock Xandros OS. The build failed with:
SNIP
I'm not sure what other info is relevant to provide.
Look for install.log, compress it,
On May 19, 3:58 am, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann crypto@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mar 31, 8:12 pm, Bill Hart goodwillh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
Hi Bill,
I just tried compiling SAGE 3.4.2 on a PS3 (Fedora Core 9). It bombs
out during the compilation of FLINT:
gcc -std=c99
On May 19, 12:45 pm, Kevin Horton khorto...@rogers.com wrote:
On 19 May 2009, at 11:45, mabshoff wrote:
On May 19, 6:31 am, Kevin Horton khorto...@rogers.com wrote:
As an experiment, I attempted to build sage-4.0.alpha0 on an EeePC
901
Linux, with the stock Xandros OS. The build
On May 19, 1:17 pm, David Harvey dmhar...@cims.nyu.edu wrote:
On May 19, 1:58 pm, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann crypto@gmail.com
wrote:
zn_poly/pack.c:86:2: error: #error Not nails-safe yet
zn_poly/pack.c:168:2: error: #error Not nails-safe yet
zn_poly/pack.c:252:2: error: #error Not
On May 19, 1:24 pm, David Harvey dmhar...@cims.nyu.edu wrote:
On May 19, 11:17 pm, David Harvey dmhar...@cims.nyu.edu wrote:
SNIP
Sorry, in case (1), I should have said, there is no easy fix from
within zn_poly itself. If Sage is not supposed to be compiling with
unsigned long !=
On May 19, 5:22 pm, Kevin Horton khorto...@rogers.com wrote:
Should sage-4.0.alpha0 build on OS X 10.5 PPC?
Yes, it should. What XCode release are you using?
--
Kevin Horton
Ottawa, Canada
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send
On May 19, 5:34 pm, Kevin Horton khorto...@rogers.com wrote:
Sorry about the last one - blasted Send button
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 8:28 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On May 19, 5:22 pm, Kevin Horton khorto...@rogers.com wrote:
Should sage-4.0.alpha0 build on OS X 10.5
Since no one seemed to have dealt with this: This is now #6066 so the
patch doesn't get lost.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On May 18, 5:21 am, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 18, 11:40 am, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps we should add a 'report bug' link on sagemath.org?
in the notebook, top right, is the report a problem link and it
would be easy to include it in the
On May 18, 6:17 am, Kevin Horton khorto...@rogers.com wrote:
On 18 May 2009, at 02:02, William Stein wrote:
SNIP
Will packages created for SPD be usable as-is in Sage, or will they
need to be tweaked in some way before they can be used with Sage?
Yes.
Will there be some sort of
On May 18, 6:37 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On May 18, 6:17 am, Kevin Horton khorto...@rogers.com wrote:
On 18 May 2009, at 02:02, William Stein wrote:
SNIP
Will packages created for SPD be usable as-is in Sage, or will they
need to be tweaked in some way before
On May 18, 8:06 am, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 18, 2:50 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Just put in a link to the wiki to a new page called
http://wiki.sagemath.org
On May 18, 9:08 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com
wrote:
From a development perspective, it makes no sense to have two separate
projects (Sage/SPD). In working on SPD, I have already run into small
bugs in
On May 18, 9:29 am, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
Not right now. I'm sure Michael Abshoff would agree that we are way
too busy just dealing with Sage itself.
OK, I am not surprised - Sage is an ambitious undertaking.
Well, world domination isn't something for weekend
On May 18, 9:50 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com
wrote:
SNIP
But, if in the medium term (as Michael is hoping for), the Sage build
system can be improved to the point where both Sage and SPD are using
the
On May 18, 10:03 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On May 18, 9:50 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com
wrote:
SNIP
But, if in the medium term (as Michael is hoping for), the Sage build
system
On May 18, 5:35 pm, Jonathan gu...@uwosh.edu wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
I've been using SAGE with one of my chemistry classes this last
semester and in the process wrote a little AppleScript that launches
SAGE and starts the notebook in local mode. I think this is a little
easier to deal with
On May 18, 5:50 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:40 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
There is already code in Sage to create a Sage app since Sage 3.3, but
it needs some more polish and hasn't been turned on per default. But
feel free
On May 18, 8:43 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
SNIP
python setup.py install --home=$SAGE_LOCAL --force
This should not be needed, i.e
python setup.py install
should just work.
Re site.py - http://pypi.python.org/pypi/workingenv.py seems to
indicate your
On May 17, 1:39 am, Serge A. Salamanka salsa-...@tut.by wrote:
It would be good to update sage-announce Google Group due to the new
release. There is still information about 3.3 release.
#Serge
Yeah, I know. It is on my list to do, but I have been working non-stop
on 4.0 for the last
On May 17, 3:29 am, Carlo Hamalainen carlo.hamalai...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:55 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
As usual please build, doctest and report any issues.
Hi Carlo,
On 32bit x86 Ubuntu 9.04:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel
On May 17, 11:33 am, J Elaych microsc...@gmail.com wrote:
Ubuntu 9.04 64bit amd xp2 builds fine. The -optional and -
experimental package list
is the same as always so I'm wondering if that is going to be upgraded
to the latest
scipy
Scipy is in Sage, so it won't show up in the optional
On May 17, 1:34 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
I'm not sure if you expected this to fail, but it compiled ok on my
Solaris 10 update 6 SPARC until here:
Yes, it was mentioned as a problem in the 4.0.a0 release notes. I have
a fix that will be in 4.0.rc0.
Cheers,
On May 16, 2:30 am, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 15 Mai, 09:52, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I am not sure I understand the question, but there is no need to
provide a diff or anything like that. It is sufficient just to put the
modified files into the spkg
On May 16, 2:41 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On May 16, 2009, at 2:25 AM, ahmet alper parker wrote:
SNIP
Of course, philosophical discussions on the merit of GNU/the GPL
belong on sage-flame, to try and keep sage-devel about more
development related stuff.
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx
I should open ticker in the next couple hours when I have some
downtime during the SD15 talks.
I have put sage.math, 32 and 64 bit MacIntel, the sources as well as
the upgrade bits into
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff
On May 16, 9:00 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
* ecl causes about two bugs and a half on OSX and probably some other
systems. __repr__ seems to cause sync issues, there is some problem
with numerical noise and the list of Maxima commands seems
On May 16, 10:37 am, Gonzalo Tornaria torna...@math.utexas.edu
wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:53 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com
wrote:
Cloning doesn't seem to work because of a non-ASCII character in
mpolynomialsystem.py. Patch up at
Sorry, I normally do the clone test
On May 16, 1:54 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/16 Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl:
SNIP
I get the same as Jaap on my 32-bit ubuntu.
Ok, I am waiting on all my builds to finish before opening ticket, but
someone feel free to open two ticktets;
(a) numerical noise
(b)
On May 16, 3:01 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/16 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
On May 16, 1:54 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/16 Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl:
SNIP
I get the same as Jaap on my 32-bit ubuntu.
... whereas on 64
On May 16, 10:00 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:53 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com
wrote:
On May 16, 7:55 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
I did not believe it would happen before the official start of SD
On May 14, 3:41 pm, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
SNIP
I am trying to keep the patch description on trac up-to-date (from the
description in the patch itself):
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/5891
On May 14, 2:00 pm, David Roe r...@math.harvard.edu wrote:
I've taken a look at most of these. I'll send Nicolas comments off list
(though I probably won't get to that until later tonight). But I agree with
Robert that a global picture wiki page would be good.
David
Please keep review
On May 15, 12:00 am, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi all!
For my p-group cohomology spkg, I use some third party code. It is an
old version of C-MeatAxe that we use for historic reasons; the code is
shortened and extensively modified.
As much as I understand, C-MeatAxe is
On May 14, 11:51 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:40:26PM -0700, mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Note that I did not choose to go for Symmetrica in the first place!
In MuPAD-Combinat, I already had done the work of replacing it
whenever possible
On May 15, 12:35 am, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Michael,
On May 15, 9:07 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Your modifications must be GPL Compatible, i.e. either the GPL itself
or something like a 2 clause BSD.
Sure, but this was my question: *How* do I make my
On May 15, 2:47 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 11:28 PM, mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Info like this should not go into trac, but on a wiki page. If you
want to see what has changed between revisions on the wiki it is
tedious at best.
I obviously
On May 15, 1:57 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Hi Dave,
This might interest some.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica/brows...
where someone is questioning the commitment of Wolfram Research towards
Solaris. There are currently no replies
It would be nice if someone with an interest in qf would review #5954
and #6040. It gets the code up to 100% and improves various bits :)
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On May 14, 12:42 am, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
As is Sage doesn't even build if you do a straight up framework build.
This can and will be fixed, but if I have learned one thing about
FrameWorks on OSX is to avoid them whenever possible, i.e that
absolute crap issue
On May 14, 1:08 am, Rado rki...@gmail.com wrote:
The bug is almost trivial. The code
verts = data.keys()
for u in data:
verts.union([v for v in data[u] if v not in verts])
is slowing down because in python searching in lists is slow. If we
use verts = set(data.keys()) the code
On May 14, 1:32 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Rado wrote:
Last question if I used ./sage -clone myvrr and made the changes in
myver, how do I tell sage to run the tests there (if this even makes
sense?)
You can do
./sage -t
Ok, *still* no alpha (I caught up with sleep yesterday-ish), but here
we go:
* 75% coverage: Still at 74.4%, but pynac will get us over 75%.
* pynac: Number of failing doctests keesp decreasing - I am not
keeping track of this, so somebody else has to update on this
* 64 bit OSX: does now
On May 14, 4:31 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ok, *still* no alpha (I caught up with sleep yesterday-ish), but here
we go:
* 75% coverage: Still at 74.4%, but pynac will get us over 75%.
* pynac: Number of failing doctests keesp decreasing - I am not
keeping track
On May 14, 9:46 am, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I don't think they would rename sum to please us!
And I really really don't think they should. After all, the issue is
that python and pari both use the same name for something -- we might
as well be asking python to
Hello folks,
most 3.4.2 binaries are up on sagemath.org and being mirrored out.
From the usual suspects some are still missing, i.e.
* Fedora Core 10 32 bit
* Atom
* RHEL 5.2/SLES 10 Itanium
* OSX 10.4 Intel
Most of the missing binaries will show up in the next 24 hours. We
also have some
.
(because of this kind of problem, I do think that everyone should run
their high-traffic mailing lists without any sort of reply-to munging,
like the Linux folks do)
On May 6, 9:46 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Since they haven't released in several years, this might
On May 14, 8:01 pm, Rado rki...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rado,
here is the patch as promised. I don't have a trac account and it
seems closed, so someone needs to paste it there.
Follow http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracGuidelines and I will take care of
your account.
On May 14, 1:18 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 08:34:56PM +0100, Martin Albrecht wrote:
Hi,
* Solaris: I finally *fixed* the symmetrica issues and all it took
was 6 hours of staring at disgusting code.
Congratulations!
Thanks.
And
On May 13, 1:42 am, Mickael Gastineau amgastin...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Dear all,
Hi Mickael,
You may have heard about the protocol called Symbolic Computation
Software Composability Protocol, abbreviated SCSCP, developped under
the SCIEnce project (http://www.symbolic-computation.org/).
I
On May 13, 5:25 am, Mickael Gastineau amgastin...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi Mickael,
The fedora says that isn't compatible but the FSF says that it is
compatible with GPL :
seehttp://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ (section CeCILL version
2)
On May 13, 2:37 pm, mark mcclure mcmcc...@unca.edu wrote:
On May 12, 3:27 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have build a 3.4.2 binary with various fixes and posted it at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/OSX64/
Please give it a spin if you care about 64
On May 13, 9:46 am, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
I just pinged the pythonmac-sig group about why and when a framework
build is actually needed. A while back I created an spkg for qt/pyqt
and I remember that I needed to do a framework build to get it to
work. My
/home/mabshoff/OSX64/
The md5sum is
ceecabe47a054674ea578449261aabcb sage-3.4.2-OSX10.5-64bit-i386-
Darwin.dmg
It still has a single workaround applied to make the notebook work,
but we should be able to resolve that and the doctest failure in
gen.pyx in the remaining time for Sage 4.0. All
On May 12, 10:37 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/12 mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com:
SNIP
I can resolve the failure in gen.pyx easily: Just completely delete
the finitefield_init function!
Well, nuking functionality is always a solution ;)
This pari function has
Hi,
this isn't against David, it just annoys me to no end that people do
this: This has come up before, but I consider it *completely useless*
when someone opens a page named
http://wiki.sagemath.org/extra%20documentation%20%28for%20the%20standard%20components%20of%20SAGE%29
since no one
On May 10, 8:48 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
So two possibilities:
* Someone figures out how to make the ecl signal handler work.
For the record: Gonzalo fixed it in a clever way without needing to
send nasty CTRL-C, so in the end we also cleaned up some other doctest
On May 11, 4:48 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
Are the sources not in the right spots yet?
Nope, but they are available at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.2/sage-3.4.2/
- Robert
Cheers,
Michael
Ok, no 4.0.a0 yet, but it should drop fairly soon. An update of what
is going on:
* 75% coverage - we are already close at 74.4% or so and the pynac
symbolics switch will get us past 75%. There is also a bunch of code
in trac that should increase coverage even further. Depending on what
else is
On May 10, 5:01 am, Prabhu Ramachandran pra...@aero.iitb.ac.in
wrote:
Hi,
Hi Prabhu,
I had a mini-vacation and I spent a while trying to get sage working
with VTK on a Macbook. The machine is somewhat slow and experimenting
takes a long while. I've managed to get VTK built with Sage but
On May 9, 2:56 am, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
this tests websites (i.e. our notebook) and could be useful. it is
nearer to the OS than selenium, which is just js
On May 10, 9:19 am, Prabhu Ramachandran pra...@aero.iitb.ac.in
wrote:
On 05/10/09 21:03, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Prabhu,
I don't understand why VTK needs Python to be a framework. Googling
around for 5 minutes did not reveal anything useful. Can you give me
some pointers
On May 10, 10:36 am, Prabhu Ramachandran pra...@aero.iitb.ac.in
wrote:
On 05/10/09 21:58, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Prabhu,
SNIP
Well, I have seen this when I got the error first time (google is our
friend) but didn't believe the answer would work for the simple reason
that VTK is really well
On May 7, 1:11 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
Mon May 11: fix fallout; malb fix os x libsingular (?)
Tue May 12: sage-4.0.rc1.tar
Wed May 13:
Thu May 14: sage-4.0.final.tar
Fri May 15: Release sage-4.0.tar.
Well, my plan was to update
On May 7, 12:55 am, davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I use this opportunity to request some reviews for modular forms
patches? I decided I'd spend a few afternoons squashing as many easy
modular forms buglets as I could, with the result that there is now a
bunch of tickets
I spend some time tonight on the gcc 4.4.0 porting problem and there
is only little work left to be done: I had resolved all issues in Sage
3.1.2, but neglected to merge all the fixed into subsequent releases.
Issues from 3.1.2 (3.4.2):
* gmp (gone in MPIR)
* ntl (Fixed in ntl-5.4.2.p7.spkg,
On May 7, 6:41 am, Golam Mortuza Hossain gmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Golam,
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:37 AM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
All the bits are in the usual place in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.2/
I am wondering
On May 7, 7:16 am, Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
Mike Hansen wrote:
Hi Mike
SNIP
ImportError: libpynac-0.1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
Error importing ipy_profile_sage - perhaps you should run %upgrade?
WARNING: Loading of ipy_profile_sage
One more thing: I have updated http://wiki.sagemath.org/plan/sage-4.0
in the wiki with most of the info here, but it might be a good idea
to
(a) keep it current as things develop
(b) add all missing info about projects, i.e. who is working on
coverage, etc
(c) clean it up in general
Signing
On May 7, 5:04 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William Stein wrote:
SNIP
wst...@sage:~$ ginsh
ginsh - GiNaC Interactive Shell (ginac V1.4.1)
...
sqrt(2)^2;
2
I've added this to the wiki.
It might be useful, if possible, to make sage -ginsh launch ginsh, or
On May 5, 10:50 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
* Is the code pure python or does it use the sage syntax? If the code
uses the sage syntax, I think it must be released under the GPL.
* Does the
-sage.math-only-x86_64-
Linux.tar.gz
All the bits are in the usual place in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.4.2/
From here on it is all about Sage 4.0.
Cheers,
Michael
Merged in Sage 3.4.2:
#5981: Michael Abshoff: Sage 3.4.2: prime_pi() broken on 32 bit
[Reviewed
On May 5, 11:34 pm, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
Licensing discussions just suck and are a waste of time. Sigh
Yes, I fully a agree with youexcept when people learn new things
about the GPL. I think some important things have come out of this
discussion:
* A
On May 6, 2:11 am, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi!
When will Singular 3-1-0 be in Sage?
The plan is that malb will update it when he is in Seattle before SD
15.
I have a program parts of which would not work with Singular 3-0-4.
So, how can I test the singular version?
On May 6, 2:20 am, Yann yannlaiglecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for the record,
isn't the following a bug?
It looks like one to me.
sage: p=RealIntervalField(4)(3.1)
sage: p.str(style='brackets')
'[3.00 .. 3.25]'
sage: p
4.?
The printing is a little odd, I would expect it to print 3.?
On May 6, 2:35 am, Yann yannlaiglecha...@gmail.com wrote:
It's trac #5942
Ok, it looked familiar. I have CCed Carl Witty on the ticket so he is
aware of its existence, not that this implies that he has to fix it.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
On May 6, 2:32 am, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Simon,
So, what Sage release, approximately?
Well, given that Sage 3.4.2 is just out and that SD15 starts in 10
days I would say the next one.
What does the docstring say? Is it supposed to work? This might be a
bug ;).
On May 6, 1:21 am, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On 2009-May-04 19:26:13 -0700, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, it seems that this does *NOT* mean that if you write a
little C program, spawn 128 threads, and watch them run, then you can
do 128 times
On May 6, 2:16 pm, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
Hello,
Hi Tim,
The ghmm developers have posted a 0.9rc1 release candidate on their
website:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=67094
Good.
with the hopes of doing an actual release shortly (they said they were
On May 6, 5:53 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is the plan for getting Sage-4.0 out. Help in any way you can.
Wed May 6: * mhansen (by 2am) -- patches/todo list so anybody can help.
* robertwb will have reviewed david roe's
* mabshoff provides
1 - 100 of 2594 matches
Mail list logo
