OK, I actually have my ARM ac100 box ready, but it will need to wait a week
before I
get back to it.
Anyhow, there are the interesting parts from that log:
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/structure/sage_object.pyx # 1
doctests failed
sage -t -long
On Saturday, 3 December 2011 17:34:01 UTC+8, Snark wrote:
Hi,
Le 03/12/2011 09:19, William Stein a �crit :
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Julien Puydtjulien...@laposte.net
wrote:
I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the
progress in trac -- with some
Le 03/12/2011 10:58, Julien Puydt a écrit :
I'll try to compile 4.7.2 now : I don't need the box before monday noon.
I have successfully built 4.7.2 (with my special spkg, of course) ; it
took about 30h -- but there was an ICE so I had to re-launch make at
some point.
I started ./sage
Le 04/12/2011 20:09, Julien Puydt a écrit :
I started ./sage -bdist 4.7.2 ; I hope there is enough disk space. We'll
see.
It worked.
I recompressed it as a bzip2 before uploading to the server.
You'll find it at the big-file-service of my ISP :
http://dl.free.fr/tHJI33UqE
It will stay up
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi,
I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the
progress in trac -- with some hope 4.7.2 may compile without patching.
Hi,
Is there any chance you could create a trac metaticket, i.e.,
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:19 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
wrote:
Hi,
I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the
progress in trac -- with some hope 4.7.2 may compile without
Hi,
Le 03/12/2011 09:19, William Stein a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Julien Puydtjulien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the
progress in trac -- with some hope 4.7.2 may compile without patching.
Is there any chance
Le 03/12/2011 09:21, William Stein a écrit :
... since I may be interested in trying a binary from you, which you
could make with sage -bdist or just by tarring up your existing
install of Sage, if you have the disk space.
I'm not sure I have the disk space, but I gave it a try :
./sage -bdist
On Dec 3, 2011 1:31 AM, Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net wrote:
Hi,
Le 03/12/2011 09:19, William Stein a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Julien Puydtjulien.pu...@laposte.net
wrote:
I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the
progress in trac --
Le 03/12/2011 19:27, William Stein a écrit :
Thanks for the updated ticket. I will probably just use the ubuntu
atlas binary instead of building atlas, to avoid trouble with that.
How does one do that for atlas? For other things?
Snark on #sagemath
--
To post to this group, send an email
On Saturday, December 3, 2011 10:45:10 AM UTC-8, Snark wrote:
Le 03/12/2011 19:27, William Stein a �crit :
Thanks for the updated ticket. I will probably just use the ubuntu
atlas binary instead of building atlas, to avoid trouble with that.
How does one do that for atlas? For other
Le 03/12/2011 20:07, John H Palmieri a écrit :
Take a look at the Sage installation guide,
http://sagemath.org/doc/installation/source.html#environment-variables
in particular the ATLAS variables.
Thanks.
Snark on #sagemath
--
To post to this group, send an email to
Le 24/08/2011 05:29, Dan Drake a écrit :
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 at 02:39PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py
**
File /home/jpuydt/sage-4.7.1/devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py, line
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 at 09:10AM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
As far as I know, building sage ends with doc building ; and make
ptestlong starts with doc building.
Now that I think of it, that already is strange... is the built doc
really written somewhere? That would explain why it keeps
Le 24/08/2011 09:53, Dan Drake a écrit :
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 at 09:10AM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
As far as I know, building sage ends with doc building ; and make
ptestlong starts with doc building.
Now that I think of it, that already is strange... is the built doc
really written somewhere?
Le 24/08/2011 10:04, Julien Puydt a écrit :
Le 24/08/2011 09:53, Dan Drake a écrit :
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 at 09:10AM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
As far as I know, building sage ends with doc building ; and make
ptestlong starts with doc building.
Now that I think of it, that already is
Hi,
I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the
progress in trac -- with some hope 4.7.2 may compile without patching.
I then ran make ptestlong to check for sanity. Unsurprisingly, things
are not perfect yet (after all I mostly focused on making it compile),
see
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 at 02:39PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py
**
File /home/jpuydt/sage-4.7.1/devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py, line 876:
sage: len(search_doc('tree',
18 matches
Mail list logo
