+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
On 10 April 2024 20:23:10 CEST, Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>Dima, our project does not have such a policy of not adding standard normal
>packages. This bundling with your political demand is inappropriate and not
>welcome here.
Why is it unwelcome?
I explained under what condition I am OK
Dima, our project does not have such a policy of not adding standard normal
packages. This bundling with your political demand is inappropriate and not
welcome here.
On Wednesday, April 10, 2024 at 11:20:14 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> As in the previous attempt, I am OK with it becoming
As in the previous attempt, I am OK with it becoming standard only if it
remains a pip package, a no new "batteries are included".
As a matter of fact, there is no point in keeping Python toolchain packages
vendored. They can all be pip packages just as well.
On 10 April 2024 05:44:36 CEST,
We added python_build as an optional "pip" package (see
https://deploy-livedoc--sagemath.netlify.app/html/en/developer/packaging#package-types
for
the terminology),
-
https://deploy-livedoc--sagemath.netlify.app/html/en/reference/spkg/python_build#spkg-python-build
(added
in 2022).