On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> I may have time next weekend to containerize the buildbot, though no
> promises. It does need quite a lot of disk space (the old one was about 50GB
> iirc) to hold all the build logs and binary builds.
The new machine
I may have time next weekend to containerize the buildbot, though no
promises. It does need quite a lot of disk space (the old one was about
50GB iirc) to hold all the build logs and binary builds. Whats the plan for
external networking and secrets?
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 9:57:43
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>> we can't, because there are filesize limits.
>> how about git-lfs ? (which is probably not cheap to use)
>
> I don't think we need any
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> we can't, because there are filesize limits.
> how about git-lfs ? (which is probably not cheap to use)
I don't think we need any of that, a normal CDN is fine, too. Problem
with using a commercial one is that the
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> no volunteers to migrate files/build/rsync.sagemath.org... We should
>> just switch to GitHub.
>
> we can't, because there are filesize
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:39 PM, William Stein wrote:
> no volunteers to migrate files/build/rsync.sagemath.org... We should
> just switch to GitHub.
we can't, because there are filesize limits.
-- h
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:10 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot
build.sagemath.org
are down...
>>
>> I've done
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:10 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org
>>> are down...
>
> I've done what I can and right now
>
>-
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:02:36 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect
>> firewall rule?
>>
>
> It was William, I suppose.
> Actually,
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org
>> are down...
I've done what I can and right now
- files.sagemath.org
- rsync.sagemath.org
seem to respond to pings. And
-
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:24 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
>> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org
>> are down...
>>
>
> I'll check on these when I'm next on campus
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot build.sagemath.org
> are down...
>
I'll check on these when I'm next on campus (probably today).
William
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 2:25:52 PM
Yes, both the file server files.sagemath.org and buildbot
build.sagemath.org are down...
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 2:25:52 PM UTC+2, leif wrote:
>
> Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Harald Schilly
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect
> firewall rule?
>
>
> It was William, I suppose.
> Actually, disabling anonymous git:// would perhaps help to reduce
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>>> tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch)
>>> tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push)
>>
>> As
Didn't we have that problem previously that OS updates would overwrite
system config (I'm guessing thats what happened).
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:02:36 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> Somebody killed
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:04:08 AM UTC, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect firewall
> rule?
>
It was William, I suppose.
Actually, disabling anonymous git:// would perhaps help to reduce server
load, without
real functionality
Somebody killed unauthorized git:// over the weekend... incorrect firewall
rule?
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 10:52:13 AM UTC+2, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
> > this really has to be documented properly.
>
> just
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> this really has to be documented properly.
just added to your ticket a comment, repeating it here:
it's not only the git-trac page, but also the "the hard way" page:
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 8:16:56 AM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Harald Schilly
> <> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober <> wrote:
> >> tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch)
> >> trac
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>> tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch)
>> tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push)
>
> As a random idea, since several
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Harald Schilly wrote:
or maybe this:
git remote add trac2 g...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git
git fetch trac2
and see if that works.
Works, but then how to checkout tickets after that?
--
Jori Mäntysalo
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Jonathan Bober wrote:
> tracgit://trac.sagemath.org/sage.git (fetch)
> tracg...@trac.sagemath.org:sage.git (push)
As a random idea, since several others were also asking me about this:
Did you try setting both trac remotes to
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:40:23 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>>
>> Is git still down, or do is the problem just that I don't know what I am
>> doing?
>>
>> jb12407@lmfdb5:/data/local/sage/sage-7.3$ git
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 6:18:53 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:02:53 AM UTC, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>> I'm having this problem with "git trac checkout 21592", for example.
>>
>> A question: how do I identify which version of git-trac is
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:02:53 AM UTC, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> I'm having this problem with "git trac checkout 21592", for example.
>
> A question: how do I identify which version of git-trac is installed? Is
> the version actually recorded anywhere in the source code?
>
there is
I'm having this problem with "git trac checkout 21592", for example.
A question: how do I identify which version of git-trac is installed? Is
the version actually recorded anywhere in the source code?
John
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 5:54:54 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 12:40:23 AM UTC, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>
> Is git still down, or do is the problem just that I don't know what I am
> doing?
>
> jb12407@lmfdb5:/data/local/sage/sage-7.3$ git trac checkout 21596
>
Make sure you have the latest `git trac` installed.
There is no
Is git still down, or do is the problem just that I don't know what I am
doing?
jb12407@lmfdb5:/data/local/sage/sage-7.3$ git trac checkout 21596
Loading ticket #21596...
Newly created local branch:
t/21596/matrix_charpoly_algorithm__flint___destroys_the_polynomial_ring_generator
Traceback (most
The buildbot is offline, too... http://build.sagedev.org
There shouldn't be a connection but its certainly an odd coincidence
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 5:22:19 PM UTC+2, William wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
> >
> > I almost
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> I almost cannot use either web interface, or git server.
> (however I can ssh to the host, although it is slow...)
> I see a lot of apache activity...
>
> Does anyone do anything heavy?
I doubt this is good:
31 matches
Mail list logo