On Aug 13, 2:10 am, Johan S. R. Nielsen j.s.r.niel...@mat.dtu.dk
wrote:
My primary objection is that for object-oriented ideology, I think
that constructors should specify what inherently _defines_ some
object. I don't think that the encoder/decoder algorithms do this for
a code.
Well, it
On Aug 12, 6:40 pm, Ryan Hinton iob...@email.com wrote:
Hello, Johan.
I'm a little confused at your restatement of my idea as well as your
description of your idea. Let me provide some code fragments to be
concrete.
class Code:
def __init__(..., encode_algorithm=['alg_name', args],
Hello, Johan.
I'm a little confused at your restatement of my idea as well as your
description of your idea. Let me provide some code fragments to be
concrete.
class Code:
def __init__(..., encode_algorithm=['alg_name', args],
decode_algorithm=['alg_name', args], ...):
# handle
Hi Ryan
It seems that we are in agreement with most thing so far then :-)
I just realised, however, a new problem with the whole encoder-decoder
solution. Many such algorithms will want to take various options (like
decoding bound, list size and multiplicity in the Guruswami-Sudan
case), which
Hi Ryan
It seems that we are in agreement with most thing so far then :-)
I just realised, however, a new problem with the whole encoder-decoder
solution. Many such algorithms will want to take various options (like
decoding bound, list size and multiplicity in the Guruswami-Sudan
case), which
Damn you, Refresh-button! Is there a way to delete such a duplicate
post?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
Hi Ryan,
Great to have an engineer on this as well. I'm probably more to the
theoretical
side of things, though I am technically an engineer :-)
Your framework sounds good to me. In fact, it's somewhat similar to
what I have done. In my case, a particular code is relatively
uninteresting,
Johan,
Replies inline below.
On Aug 3, 3:34 am, Johan S. R. Nielsen j.s.r.niel...@mat.dtu.dk
wrote:
...
I guess that Ensembles as you describe them could be implemented
completely on
top of the object hierarchy I am suggesting. E.g. a XCodesEnsemble
would have
a constructor for specifying
Johan,
I certainly do not qualify as a Sage veteran, but I have done some
work on the engineering side of coding theory (LDPC codes).
Your framework sounds good to me. In fact, it's somewhat similar to
what I have done. In my case, a particular code is relatively
uninteresting, so I have been
