On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 08:52:48PM -0700, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
I'm not an expert, but in case it helps: It seems that pyparsing is
already included with matplotlib. However, the import statement needs
to be qualified:
sage: import matplotlib.pyparsing
Ah ah, thanks much for the
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 08:52:48PM -0700, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
I'm not an expert, but in case it helps: It seems that pyparsing is
already included with matplotlib. However, the import statement needs
to be qualified:
sage: import matplotlib.pyparsing
Ah ah, thanks much for the
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Ah, by the way, a question for spkg experts: the current dot2tex spkg
I built contains two separate python modules, pyparsing and dot2tex,
the later depending on the former. Should there be two spkg's instead?
Is it possible to state the dependency so that users could
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 at 09:12AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Ah, by the way, a question for spkg experts: the current dot2tex spkg
I built contains two separate python modules, pyparsing and dot2tex,
the later depending on the former. Should there be two spkg's instead?
I'm not a spkg
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:22:07AM -0700, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Ah, by the way, a question for spkg experts: the current dot2tex spkg
I built contains two separate python modules, pyparsing and dot2tex,
the later depending on the former. Should there be two spkg's
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:22:07AM -0700, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Ah, by the way, a question for spkg experts: the current dot2tex spkg
I built contains two separate python modules, pyparsing and dot2tex,
the later depending on the former. Should
Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for working on the LaTeX-graph code. I'll certainly give this
a closer look soon, with an eye towards not wreak[ing] further
havoc. ;-) Have a couple of other things in the queue first,
though.
Fidel Barerra and I both have some work to do on this front, so I'll
try to
