On 8/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It build fine but the I/O is seriously bugged for me, at least for the
displaying of rational functions (but probably wrapping too)...
...
Oops, for the full axiom interface to work reliably you need
sage-2.8.1 or the following patch:
no, the problem is most definitely still there, in both your and my
example, even after installing the patch. it does produce interesting
errors...
--
| SAGE Version 2.8, Release Date: 2007-08-12 |
| Type
On 8/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, the problem is most definitely still there, in both your and my
example, even after installing the patch. it does produce interesting
errors...
I can not reproduce these errors on the sage.math server (Linux) but
careful testing on
On 8/15/07, Bill Page I wrote:
...
How much objection would there be to building Clisp in Sage without
readline support?
...
Alternatively assuming no dynamic method of disabling readline for
Clisp is found, I guess I could use the clisp*.spkg source to build a
local copy of clisp without
Maybe this is more work than you want to get into but here's
an idea:
(1) try building SAGE using Clisp without readline support,
check for warnings etc,
(2) run sage -testall, check for broken tests.
(3) report problems to the lists.
Would that add useful information?
On 8/15/07, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe this is more work than you want to get into but here's
an idea:
(1) try building SAGE using Clisp without readline support,
check for warnings etc,
(2) run sage -testall, check for broken tests.
(3) report problems to the lists.
Would
On 8/15/07, David Joyner wrote:
Maybe this is more work than you want to get into but here's
an idea:
(1) try building SAGE using Clisp without readline support,
check for warnings etc,
(2) run sage -testall, check for broken tests.
(3) report problems to the lists.
Would that add useful
On 8/15/07, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I could/will easily do this. I have no reason to believe that any
tests would fail, but of course it is good to check. The main
difference would be felt by those people who use -clisp, -maxima, or
-axiom in console-mode. These users would
On 8/15/07, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Maxima should never ever fail due to communication between SAGE and
Maxima. I spent a lot of time making sure of that a few months ago, when
we were rolling out the calculus functionality, which uses the maxima
interface
very very
On 8/15/07, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wonderful.
It just took a lot of work refining how the maxima interface works --
it resynchronizes itself before every interaction by putting
random number + 1 in the input and waits for the result of that
arithmetic, etc. I'm sure the
Paul,
If you have a moment to spare, could you please try this *additional(
patch for axiom.py in sage-2.8:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/page/axiom.py-0.3.1.patch
--
bsd:~/sage-2.8/devel page$ diff -au
./sage-main/sage/interfaces/axiom.py
./sage-test/sage/interfaces/axiom.py
The package is not available where you linked to, but I applied the
change you said manually and both your example and mine work now.
Thanks! Now off to play with GUESS on some neat polynomials...
Paul
On Aug 15, 7:39 pm, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul,
If you have a moment to spare,
William Stein wrote:
for the previous version of Axiom). I've created a SAGE package and
would like to request SAGE users to test out building this package on
OS X and Linux. To try the package just do this:
sage -i axiom4sage-0.3.1.spkg
After about 10-15 minutes you should
On 8/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It build fine but the I/O is seriously bugged for me, at least for the
displaying of rational functions (but probably wrapping too)...
Thanks for the report. I will look into it.
Do other things work ok? E.g. this script that posted
14 matches
Mail list logo
