It turns out that here Apple is not doing anything wrong.
(after having a discussion here:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/17795537)
It's improper use of BLAS by CVXOPT people that triggers errors.
The C code in question violates BLAS convention that incx=0 in these kinds
of BLAS
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 4:49:12 PM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
It turns out that here Apple is not doing anything wrong.
(after having a discussion here:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/17795537)
It's improper use of BLAS by CVXOPT people that triggers errors.
The C code in
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 18:21:40 John H Palmieri wrote:
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 4:49:12 PM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
It turns out that here Apple is not doing anything wrong.
(after having a discussion here:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/17795537)
It's improper use of BLAS by
Hi John,
I emailed you my latest communication to them.
Hopefully it's not such a big deal.
Dima
On Friday, 9 March 2012 10:21:40 UTC+8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 4:49:12 PM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
It turns out that here Apple is not doing anything wrong.
On Friday, 9 March 2012 10:26:23 UTC+8, François wrote:
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 18:21:40 John H Palmieri wrote:
On Thursday, March 8, 2012 4:49:12 PM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
It turns out that here Apple is not doing anything wrong.
(after having a discussion here:
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 18:31:14 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
yes, I think 1.1.4 is no different in this way. Actually, we should update
our cvxopt spkg to 1.1.4.
Ok but that still mean we have a bug with the latest OS X. So we should
look for a solution of some kind. Are the cvxopt authors interested in
On Friday, 9 March 2012 10:37:46 UTC+8, François wrote:
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 18:31:14 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
yes, I think 1.1.4 is no different in this way. Actually, we should
update
our cvxopt spkg to 1.1.4.
Ok but that still mean we have a bug with the latest OS X. So we should
look
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On 3/6/12 4:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
OK, guys, bad news, we will have to build Altlas on Lion!
Or wait for Apple to fix their blas...
I checked the attached C code on sqrt5, both with gcc and with cc (i.e.
clang), and it's all
confirmed.
On 3/6/12 4:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
OK, guys, bad news, we will have to build Altlas on Lion!
Or wait for Apple to fix their blas...
I checked the attached C code on sqrt5, both with gcc and with cc (i.e.
clang), and it's all
confirmed.
Wow. Just wow. So should we not trust matlab or
On Mar 6, 9:32 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/6/12 4:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
OK, guys, bad news, we will have to build Altlas on Lion!
Or wait for Apple to fix their blas...
I checked the attached C code on sqrt5, both with gcc and with cc (i.e.
clang),
On Mar 6, 9:32 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 3/6/12 4:30 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
OK, guys, bad news, we will have to build Altlas on Lion!
Or wait for Apple to fix their blas...
I checked the attached C code on sqrt5, both with gcc and with cc (i.e.
clang),
11 matches
Mail list logo
