Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

2024-04-20 Thread Dima Pasechnik
I've filed https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/37838 On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 5:34 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > This is due to https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37495 > Sorry, this is the usual careless reviewing of late, preventing people > from using their own Singular (too "new") > The

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

2024-04-20 Thread Dima Pasechnik
This is due to https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37495 Sorry, this is the usual careless reviewing of late, preventing people from using their own Singular (too "new") The check should have been conditional on building Sage's own Singular - otherwise it should have been ignored. You can

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

2024-04-20 Thread 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
Dima Pasechnik schrieb am Samstag, 20. April 2024 um 17:57:05 UTC+2: [...] well, this looks relevant. "any of gmp ntl flint readline mpfr cddlib is installed as or will be installed as SPKG" these are Singular's dependencies, and possibly not all of them are on your OS. In particular, flint is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

2024-04-20 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, April 19, 2024 at 12:36:26 PM UTC+1 Peter Mueller wrote: @Dima, thanks, I know that though. Nevertheless, I now started from anew (that is I removed the sage directory and git-cloned sage to make sure that there are no remains causing trouble). After running configure, the script

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

2024-04-19 Thread 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
@Dima, thanks, I know that though. Nevertheless, I now started from anew (that is I removed the sage directory and git-cloned sage to make sure that there are no remains causing trouble). After running configure, the script suggests to `sudo pacman -S eclib fflas-ffpack linbox nauty singular`.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

2024-04-19 Thread dimpase
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:28:13AM -0700, 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel wrote: > I just figured out that the installation from source (even with the > explicit configure option `--with-system-singular`) on an up to date arch > linux machine ignores the installed singular (`pacman -Q singular`

[sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

2024-04-19 Thread 'Peter Mueller' via sage-devel
I just figured out that the installation from source (even with the explicit configure option `--with-system-singular`) on an up to date arch linux machine ignores the installed singular (`pacman -Q singular` returns `singular 4.3.2.p16-1`). Not sure if it is a path problem that makes the

[sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

2024-04-18 Thread Antonio Rojas
Works fine with system singular 4.3.2.p16 too, so this may be a bug in that particular Singular version. El jueves, 18 de abril de 2024 a las 6:02:53 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee escribió: > No problem with Singular 4.3.2 included in sage (on mac). -- You received this message because you are

[sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

2024-04-17 Thread Kwankyu Lee
No problem with Singular 4.3.2 included in sage (on mac). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this

[sage-devel] Re: SingularError in rational_parameterization

2024-04-17 Thread Nils Bruin
Thanks. It looks like the error occurs in integralbasis.lib. It's last version data is fairly recent, so the file may be under active maintenance. sagemath has grown enough divisor machinery that it can probably compute a conic model of a genus 0 curve, which would be more standard to try and