On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 06:11:09PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
:). It might be possible, but it'd be really, really messy (messier
than it is in C++, because one needs the shared
Hi Robert,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 06:11:09PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
:). It might be possible, but it'd be really, really messy (messier
than it is in C++, because one needs the shared PyObject_HEAD to be
correctly accessed by all the Python C API framework).
Didn't you mention
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Hi William,
On 2015-01-13, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Ideally, there would be a category framework fully implemented in
Cython---which is impossible, since you can't create cdef classes
dynamically
and also
On 2015-01-13, Daniel Krenn kr...@aon.at wrote:
Am 2015-01-12 um 22:07 schrieb David Roe:
I would say that, ideally, the kind of functionality that
you're moving from Group to Monoid should go in the categories. Then we
don't need an intermediate class in the Python inheritance tree.
Does
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
On 2015-01-13, Daniel Krenn kr...@aon.at wrote:
Am 2015-01-12 um 22:07 schrieb David Roe:
I would say that, ideally, the kind of functionality that
you're moving from Group to Monoid should go in the categories.
Hi William,
On 2015-01-13, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Ideally, there would be a category framework fully implemented in
Cython---which is impossible, since you can't create cdef classes
dynamically
and also can not (yet?) create cdef classes inheriting from more than
one base
