Hi everybody!
Actually because in sage-on-gentoo we use the system boost we hit that
particular doctest failure a long time ago. I then asked Alexander Dreyer
who
works on polybori if the output was ok and it didn't seem to be concerned.
Indeed, you can safely ignore the changes in the
On Feb 27, 9:39 am, Timo Kluck tkl...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is that we're upgrading boost, and apparently, its random number
generator has slightly changed. Therefore, we have some failing doctests
for random_set.
Do we really want to test our random number generators for
deterministic
Hi Nils,
On 2013-02-27, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca wrote:
On Feb 27, 9:39 am, Timo Kluck tkl...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue is that we're upgrading boost, and apparently, its random number
generator has slightly changed. Therefore, we have some failing doctests
for random_set.
Do we really
Op woensdag 27 februari 2013 20:19:32 UTC+1 schreef Simon King het volgende:
Hi Nils,
On 2013-02-27, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca javascript: wrote:
Do we really want to test our random number generators for
deterministic behaviour? If so, the test should probably at least set
the seed
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:19:34 Timo Kluck wrote:
Op woensdag 27 februari 2013 20:19:32 UTC+1 schreef Simon King het volgende:
Hi Nils,
On 2013-02-27, Nils Bruin nbr...@sfu.ca javascript: wrote:
Do we really want to test our random number generators for
deterministic behaviour? If so,
