[sage-devel] Re: pynac may require C++11 in Sage

2015-04-29 Thread leif
On 04/29/2015 08:01 AM, Thierry Dumont wrote: Le 29/04/2015 02:28, Volker Braun a écrit : +1 to requiring C++11 support. IMHO that added a number of really nice refinements of the language, if you aren't using it yet for a C++ project then you are making a mistake. +1 I am developing

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pynac may require C++11 in Sage

2015-04-29 Thread Thierry Dumont
Le 29/04/2015 02:28, Volker Braun a écrit : +1 to requiring C++11 support. IMHO that added a number of really nice refinements of the language, if you aren't using it yet for a C++ project then you are making a mistake. +1 I am developing extensively in C++: C++11 offers many interesting

[sage-devel] Re: pynac may require C++11 in Sage

2015-04-28 Thread Volker Braun
+1 to requiring C++11 support. IMHO that added a number of really nice refinements of the language, if you aren't using it yet for a C++ project then you are making a mistake. On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 4:23:25 AM UTC-4, Ralf Stephan wrote: Hello, with C++11 unique_ptr in a pynac

[sage-devel] Re: pynac may require C++11 in Sage

2015-04-28 Thread leif
On 04/28/2015 10:23 AM, Ralf Stephan wrote: So, is there any reason not to make C++11 mandatory in Sage? This probably just implies SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes on more platforms. Anyway, IMHO each package should check whether C++11 is supported. (We'd still have to deal with that in some extension

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pynac may require C++11 in Sage

2015-04-28 Thread John Cremona
On 28 April 2015 at 17:03, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote: On 04/28/2015 10:23 AM, Ralf Stephan wrote: So, is there any reason not to make C++11 mandatory in Sage? This probably just implies SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=yes on more platforms. Anyway, IMHO each package should check whether C++11 is

[sage-devel] Re: pynac may require C++11 in Sage

2015-04-28 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 6:03:26 PM UTC+2, leif wrote: Anyway, IMHO each package should check whether C++11 is supported. That may not be sufficient because headers from eg pynac are included in cythonized files and so errors are generated there. When adding the C++11 switch to the

[sage-devel] Re: pynac may require C++11 in Sage

2015-04-28 Thread Ralf Stephan
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 6:03:26 PM UTC+2, leif wrote: On 04/28/2015 10:23 AM, Ralf Stephan wrote: So, is there any reason not to make C++11 mandatory in Sage? (We'd still have to deal with that in some extension modules' extra_compile_args(?) for a while.)

[sage-devel] Re: pynac may require C++11 in Sage

2015-04-28 Thread leif
Ralf Stephan wrote: On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 6:03:26 PM UTC+2, leif wrote: Anyway, IMHO each package should check whether C++11 is supported. That may not be sufficient because headers from eg pynac are included in cythonized files and so errors are generated there. When adding

[sage-devel] Re: pynac may require C++11 in Sage

2015-04-28 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
Latest NTL releases also require C++11. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sage-devel group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email