On 5/15/10 3:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
It would be useful to have a page like this excellent page:
http://www.scipy.org/NumPy_for_Matlab_Users
Here is a start for graph theory:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/GraphTheoryRoadmap
(or an earlier version in table form:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 5/15/10 3:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
It would be useful to have a page like this excellent page:
http://www.scipy.org/NumPy_for_Matlab_Users
Here is a start for graph theory:
On 05/15/10 09:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
It would be useful to have a page like this excellent page:
http://www.scipy.org/NumPy_for_Matlab_Users
William
That is very impressive.
dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On May 14, 10:52 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
According to that table, Mathematica can't do the Lambert W-Function. As a
non-mathematician, that does not mean a lot to me, but reading.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertW-Function.html
That's interesting. My first
On 05/15/10 05:22 PM, Harald Schilly wrote:
On May 14, 10:52 pm, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
According to that table, Mathematica can't do the Lambert W-Function. As a
non-mathematician, that does not mean a lot to me, but reading.
On 15 Mai, 19:52, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I think the biggest thing this proves is just how poorly that NIST table was
put
together.
Ask them for founding a better one compiled by you... ;-)
I think a huge table of Mathematica/MATLAB/Sage/Magma equivalent functions
On 05/15/10 08:03 PM, Nathan O'Treally wrote:
On 15 Mai, 19:52, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I think the biggest thing this proves is just how poorly that NIST table was put
together.
Ask them for founding a better one compiled by you... ;-)
Not quite sure I follow that.
On 15 Mai, 21:21, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 05/15/10 08:03 PM, Nathan O'Treally wrote:
I think a huge table of Mathematica/MATLAB/Sage/Magma equivalent functions
would
be useful.
Especially for people who want to use Sage and are already familiar
with
Hi,
It would be useful to have a page like this excellent page:
http://www.scipy.org/NumPy_for_Matlab_Users
William
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 05/15/10 08:03 PM, Nathan O'Treally wrote:
On 15 Mai, 19:52, Dr. David
On May 14, 4:32 pm, Fredrik Johansson fredrik.johans...@gmail.com
wrote:
It would be nice to have something like this for Sage (including information
about which library implements what, how generally etc), and not just for
special functions.
Yeahr, exactly. A good start is the constructions
On May 14, 10:01 am, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
I found a table by NIST comparing sage with other software packages.
It's probably interesting for what they are looking for and I think
some entries are missing (feedback link at the bottom). Maybe worth
checking this out
On 5/14/10 9:32 AM, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com mailto:harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
I found a table by NIST comparing sage with other software packages.
It's probably interesting for what they are looking for and I
12 matches
Mail list logo
