On Dec 15, 4:34 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out. I was looking for svd, lower-case,
and missed it.
actually, me too. Is there a reason why it is uppercase? I'm for
renaming it to lowercase and adding an uppercase synonym for backwards
compatibility.
h
--
Harald Schilly wrote:
On Dec 15, 4:34 am, mhampton hampto...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out. I was looking for svd, lower-case,
and missed it.
actually, me too. Is there a reason why it is uppercase? I'm for
renaming it to lowercase and adding an uppercase synonym for
With respect to some of this discussion, see also the following sage-
support request:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/9e6475494f85cd53
- kcrisman
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
mhampton wrote:
If you convert to numpy matrices, then Sage is pretty competitive with
matlab. We still have some room for improvement in making it easy
though - despite Jason Grout's improvements, a matrix over RDF is
missing some methods I'd like, such as the singular value
decomposition.
Jason Grout wrote:
Use .SVD():
I should mention that .SVD just calls numpy/scipy for the actual
computation.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
Thanks for pointing that out. I was looking for svd, lower-case,
and missed it.
-Marshall
On Dec 14, 6:33 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Jason Grout wrote:
Use .SVD():
I should mention that .SVD just calls numpy/scipy for the actual
computation.
Jason
--
To post
If you convert to numpy matrices, then Sage is pretty competitive with
matlab. We still have some room for improvement in making it easy
though - despite Jason Grout's improvements, a matrix over RDF is
missing some methods I'd like, such as the singular value
decomposition. As an example, to
On Dec 13, 1:02 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have written a draft of a tutorial on functional programming for
mathematicians.
Very nice, i added a comment and I just repeat it here. I think you
should also point to the operator python package, since defining add
in a function
Thanks a lot for this tutorial. I think it would be great to have it
included in the documentation.
I did not know anything about functional programming before using
sage. To a new mathematical user without python knowledge things like
lambda = 4
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
lambda?
No object
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
I have written a draft of a tutorial on functional programming for
mathematicians. The tutorial is available on the Sage wiki [1], but
you could also find it at Wordpress [2]. This is a redundancy measure
in case the wiki is down. I invite you to comments on it
On Dec 12, 4:24 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
[f(x) for x in [1..10] if f(x)0]
This is actually bad style. It means that f gets evaluated twice for
all the values that end up in the list.
The magma language solves this with modified semantics for the where
clause. One would
Nils Bruin wrote:
On Dec 12, 4:24 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
[f(x) for x in [1..10] if f(x)0]
This is actually bad style. It means that f gets evaluated twice for
all the values that end up in the list.
Good point.
The magma language solves this with modified
Hi Jason,
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
SNIP
Do you think you could add a sentence or two in the filter section about
using list comprehensions to do filters, like you did above in the map
section?
The tutorial is updated with such an
13 matches
Mail list logo
