Re: [sage-devel] Runtimes of binary versus from-source

Hi On 6 July 2012 12:25, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-07-06 12:19, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Yes, it was on the same host, and two or three runs of each gave > > the same results. > And were the Sage sources compiled in both cases as 64-bit? And was it > the same Sage version? > Yes, 5.0.1.

Re: [sage-devel] Runtimes of binary versus from-source

On 2012-07-06 12:19, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Yes, it was on the same host, and two or three runs of each gave > the same results. And were the Sage sources compiled in both cases as 64-bit? And was it the same Sage version? -- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.c

Re: [sage-devel] Runtimes of binary versus from-source

Hi On 6 July 2012 10:59, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2012-07-06 10:50, Jan Groenewald wrote: > > Hi > > > > On 5 July 2012 12:40, Jan Groenewald > > wrote: > > > > As an interesting aside, > > > > This problem, when running succesfully, on Ubuntu 11.04, took this

Re: [sage-devel] Runtimes of binary versus from-source

On 2012-07-06 10:50, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi > > On 5 July 2012 12:40, Jan Groenewald > wrote: > > As an interesting aside, > > This problem, when running succesfully, on Ubuntu 11.04, took this long > > from upstream sage binary: 264 seconds > from s

[sage-devel] Runtimes of binary versus from-source

Hi On 5 July 2012 12:40, Jan Groenewald wrote: > As an interesting aside, > > This problem, when running succesfully, on Ubuntu 11.04, took this long > > from upstream sage binary: 264 seconds > from sage source compiled: 11 seconds I'd like to demonstrate to students why this difference exist