[sage-devel] Too long lines cut off in the pdf documentation

2013-02-03 Thread mbejger
Dear group, First-time poster here :-) Is there a systematic way to deal with too long lines that doesn't involve manual corrections? Any help would be appreciated ;-) There was a topic about it in 2008, but now it seems obsolete

Re: Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-21 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Thursday 21 January 2010, David Joyner wrote: I have run some of these tests on an imac running 10.6.2 in sage 4.3.1 (sage-4.3.1.a5, to be precise) and got what seems to be much shorter times (see below). I'm not sure but it seems that at least for the coding theory modules, there does not

Re: Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-21 Thread David Joyner
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote: On Thursday 21 January 2010, David Joyner wrote: I have run some of these tests on an imac running 10.6.2 in sage 4.3.1 (sage-4.3.1.a5, to be precise) and got what seems to be much shorter times (see below).

Re: Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-21 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de wrote: On Thursday 21 January 2010, David Joyner wrote: I have run some of these tests on an imac running 10.6.2 in sage 4.3.1 (sage-4.3.1.a5, to be precise) and got what seems to be much shorter times (see below).

Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-21 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:54:57PM -0800, Robert Miller wrote: It's time to point our fingers at long doctests again. (I won't name names, but there are a few people who are mostly responsible for several of these files) Here are the eight files whose doctests (without -long) take the longest:

Re: Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-21 Thread Robert Miller
William wrote: It's possible he didn't set the DOT_SAGE environment variable to something in /scratch, which will impact timings hugely (at least until somebody rewrites Sage temp file code in misc/misc.py to use the standard tempfile module). DOT_SAGE was set to /scratch/rlm/.sage when I ran

Re: Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-21 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: William wrote: It's possible he didn't set the DOT_SAGE environment variable to something in /scratch, which will impact timings hugely (at least until somebody rewrites Sage temp file code in misc/misc.py to use the

Re: Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-21 Thread Robert Miller
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:20 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote: If the problem really is the filesystem, then maybe /scratch is way too slow. Can you try setting DOT_SAGE to something in /tmp or /space, since /tmp could be far better than /scratch for large numbers of accesses. I just

Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-20 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi Robert! On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 02:21:55PM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:54:57 -0800, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: And here are the eight longest -long doctests: devel/sage-main/sage/rings/arith.py 506.284008026 Where was this run? I find

[sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-19 Thread Robert Miller
It's time to point our fingers at long doctests again. (I won't name names, but there are a few people who are mostly responsible for several of these files) Here are the eight files whose doctests (without -long) take the longest: devel/sage-main/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py

Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-19 Thread David Joyner
I am one of them, sorry! I'll try to look at this went I get some time. I'm teaching a new course this semester which is taking a lot of prep... http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/wdj/teach/sm450.html On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: It's time to point our

Re: [sage-devel] TOO LONG!

2010-01-19 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:54:57 -0800, Robert Miller r...@rlmiller.org wrote: And here are the eight longest -long doctests: devel/sage-main/sage/rings/arith.py 506.284008026 Where was this run? I find it very strange, because #7678 recently arranged things so that arith.py runs quite a bit