Does this shed some light to
[#15253](https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15253) ?
El viernes, 5 de mayo de 2017, 8:07:02 (UTC+2), jplab escribió:
>
>
>
> >
>> > The reason to wonder is that it seems to provide methods to a
>> polyhedron
>> > object which make no sense:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
> > The reason to wonder is that it seems to provide methods to a polyhedron
> > object which make no sense:
> >
> >
> > .is_idempotent()
> > .is_zero()
> > .n()
> > .numerical_approx()
> > .subs()
> > .substitute()
>
> This is a *mess* that should actually be removed from Element!
On 04/05/2017 12:30, jplab wrote:
Dear all,
Some time ago, during the Sage Days 84 in Olot,
https://wiki.sagemath.org/days84
some participants (including myself) wondered why would Polyhedron objects
inherit from the "Element" class.
The reason to wonder is that it seems to provide methods
Dear all,
Some time ago, during the Sage Days 84 in Olot,
https://wiki.sagemath.org/days84
some participants (including myself) wondered why would Polyhedron objects
inherit from the "Element" class.
The reason to wonder is that it seems to provide methods to a polyhedron
object which make
