Re: [sage-devel] Why do we keep (very old) itanium binaries?

2014-10-23 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
There used to be Itanium machines on the GCC Compile Farm, and I have access there, in particular for testing/developing Sage stuff. I don't now the current situation though. Actually, I am supposed to write a laius about the need for Sage portability on exotic archs/porting somehow on Windows

[sage-devel] Why do we keep (very old) itanium binaries?

2014-10-22 Thread mmarco
In the download page, we offer binaries for red hat 5.3 (+4 years old) over itanium architecture. The version of Sage is 5.0.1 (+2 years old). Is it really useful to keep it? Are there any actual downloads? I would say that, if we can support Fedora over Itanium (that is, if we have a buildbot

Re: [sage-devel] Why do we keep (very old) itanium binaries?

2014-10-22 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:50 AM, mmarco mma...@unizar.es wrote: In the download page, we offer binaries for red hat 5.3 (+4 years old) over itanium architecture. The version of Sage is 5.0.1 (+2 years old). Is it really useful to keep it? Are there any actual downloads? I would say that, if