Re: [sage-devel] fplll 5.0 in sage

2016-08-11 Thread 'Martin R. Albrecht' via sage-devel
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21221 Cheers, Martin Jean-Pierre Flori writes: > Yes! > > Did you open a ticket for this? -- _pgp: https://keybase.io/martinralbrecht _www: https://martinralbrecht.wordpress.com _jab: martinralbre...@jabber.ccc.de _otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F

Re: [sage-devel] fplll 5.0 in sage

2016-08-09 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
Yes! Did you open a ticket for this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email

Re: [sage-devel] fplll 5.0 in sage

2016-08-05 Thread Johan S . H . Rosenkilde
Sounds pretty great! > [X] Yes > [ ] No > [ ] Maybe Best, Johan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post

Re: [sage-devel] fplll 5.0 in sage

2016-08-05 Thread Thierry
Hi, giving interfaces initially developped for Sage to upstream is the way to go. The benefits of free-software ecosystem should be two-ways, otherwise Sage is only predating other softwares. Moreover with such an approach, upstream will make it cover all features when they appear so that they

[sage-devel] fplll 5.0 in sage

2016-08-05 Thread 'Martin R. Albrecht' via sage-devel
Hi Sage developers, *tl;dr* Fplll 5.0 is about to hit the streets. It’s a major improvement over Fplll 4.* which we currently ship with Sage. To update we need to change the user interface of the function `IntegerMatrix.BKZ`. I suggest to drop Sage’s own interface to Fplll in favour of the